Yeeah it's jealousy... that's why we have Halo and Halo 2 available and they aren't anywhere near anyone's top 100 FPS list. We just can't seem to get enough of it, that's why I'm dying for Halo 3 to be ported.
[/sarcasm]
The other title that gets all the crazy reviews is Gears of War, and even though I wasn't originally too happy that Epic (previously a PC devoted studio) decided against producing a PC version of the sequel, then I remember the original GOW for PC, which was an OK game, but nothing like the X360 users make it out to be (And I didn't have any of the bug issues when I played it).
I figured if Epic is going to start putting out crap that they don't care about for the PC, then they might as well just leave and don't make any games for us. I can still cling onto Valve, they haven't let me down and I don't think they will any time soon (even if they listen to whiners and end up nerfing the Demoman in TF2).
The point I was trying to make with the analogy above is that Halo series aren't bad games, but they aren't one bit innovative or revolutionary for us, so we really don't care for Halo PC version AKA Generic FPS #3922 like the Xbox fans do. We have already experienced all that it had offer before it ever came out, so we weren't surprised, but players who only owned consoles were, because there was nothing else they could compare it to.
Snickers aren't bad, but they are nowhere near close matching the chocolaty greatness of the different types of Swiss chocolate (especially milk chocolate
), simply because they are made to satisfy an appetite and not go above and beyond to make you crave for them. You can bet if Halo kids were presented with Quake or Unreal a few years before Halo, it would barely have a small fraction of the current fanbase.