• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

News

PDC: Microsoft unveils new programming platforms

In the later stages of today's keynote presentations at Microsoft's Professional Developers' conference, four of the company's more celebrated developers, including C# creator Anders Hejlsberg and COM pioneer Don Box, publicly unveiled a staggering array of new programming platforms including the company's Atlas programming model. Read more

Dell lines up new quad-SLI gaming PC, portable desktop

If you have missed out on Dell's first PC with four graphics cards, here's another chance. The company just launched its second quad-SLI PC as well as a high-end portable desktop computer with a 20" display and an "ultramobile" performance notebook. Read more

Larrabee And Dunnington To Star At IDF

Santa Clara (CA) - Intel is gearing up for its Spring Developer Forum, which will open its doors on April 2 in Shanghai. Read more

Nvidia Quadro FX 4800 Pro Goodness

Nvidia has launched the Quadro FX 4800 professional graphics card, featuring 192 processor cores and 1.5 GB of memory Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Hard Drives, Yesterday And Today: From 500 GB To 1.5 TB

Hard Drives, Yesterday And Today: From 500 GB To 1.5 TB

Hard drive capacities have increased in large increments over the last few years, while trends indicate reduced spindle speeds of 5,400 RPM instead of 7,200. We looked at three generations of Samsung hard drives to analyze the performance ramifications. Read more

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: June '09

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: June '09

This month, ATI's new Radeon HD 4770 is missing in action, since online stores are not only unable to keep it in stock, but also de-listing it completely. With violent movements in pricing, though, it'd have been taken off the recommended list anyway. Read more

Editor's Corner: Nvidia’s Ion Revisited, 7.1 Ch. LPCM Fixed

Editor's Corner: Nvidia’s Ion Revisited, 7.1 Ch. LPCM Fixed

Nvidia's Ion for the do-it-yourselfer launched last month in the form of Zotac's mini-ITX motherboard. Though sexy in principle, the platform had some teething pains right out of the gate. Chris Angelini revisits those issues and uses Ion as a real HTPC. Read more

Core i7 Memory Scaling: From DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600

Core i7 Memory Scaling: From DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600

Do you want a quick Core i7 system, but don’t feel confident sticking to Intel's spec and using the DDR3-1066 memory supported by the processor? We benchmark the most relevant memory speed and timing combinations to check the benefit of going faster. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > Will my system handle Far Cry 2?

Will my system handle Far Cry 2?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Good morning/afternoon/evening all. Here are my systems specs; at least the ones most relevant to gaming:

Asus M2N-E Mainboard
AMD Athlon X2 (2.0GHz) 3800+
4GB OCZ PC2-6400 (DDR2-800) (1gb x 4) Platinum Revision 2
Asus (EAX1950PRO) Radeon x1950 Pro PCI-E w/256MB
Creative Labs Sound Blaster Audigy 2 ZS Gamer
Western Digital (WD2500AAKS) 250GB Hard Drive

I've been looking around at far cry 2 system specs online, trying to determine if I need to do a processor or video card upgrade before october 21st when this game is released. I'm thinking my video card should be ok for low-medium settings, but I think my processor is a bit weak. I don't know how much the processor will play in the mix with this game even though they recommend a 5200+. Any suggestions? Thanks.

-- MaSoP

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
- 0 +

wait until it is actually released, but you should be able to run it. However, running it on, as you say, low medium settings is most probably the limit.... I would say that both CPU and GPU will need an upgrade to go much higher than that, but as ever, the longer you hold out on upgrading, the cheaper stuff will get (and since the game you want isn't even out yet, there isn't much point for you... yet)

Reply to spuddyt

In my opinion cpu will struggle.

Reply to mrplow99

I'd expect the game's performance to be similar to that of Crysis, so your system should be able to "handle" it on low/medium settings.

Reply to Heyyou27
- 0 +

Heyyou27 wrote :

I'd expect the game's performance to be similar to that of Crysis, so your system should be able to "handle" it on low/medium settings.



Thanks for the reply. I think I'll ride out the fall season once I pickup the game in 1 week assuming they stick to the 10/21/08 (Tue) release date. If it runs like Crysis does than I should be fine for the most part. I always wanted to see Crysis in all it's glory but my system is incapable of doing so. I will say that the original Far Cry played very well on my previous rig which included an Athlon XP 3200+, 9800 Pro 256MB and 2GB of memory. I can't recall which settings I used on the original, but I do know I used medium settings in Crysis which was perfectly acceptable.

Unless the game plays only in low res mode, I'll hold off on an upgrade until black friday, or christmas. If I see any crazy black friday ads online for a faster AM2+ based processor (retail boxed) or video card than I may jump then. Thanks again, to all 3 who replied to my original question. :-)

-- MaSoP

Reply to masop

I actually read that it should be less demanding than Crysis.

Since I was able to play Crysis at medium settings @ 1920 x 1200 with my Radeon 1900XT 512MB, I expect Far Cry 2 should run fine. I didn't notice any low FPS in Crysis until the final battle when I had to fire at the belly of the beast; at which point I definitely noticed low FPS (probably mid-teens).

I typically play a stealth game in Crysis. I don't go in guns blazing unless I need to which could be why I don't really notice any sluggish performance until the end.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | X1900XT 512MB | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi | WinXP

There is no such thing as a stupid question.
But there are stupid people.
Reply to jaguarskx
- 0 +

WTF??? how can a X1900 handle crysis medium in such a high res????? how many FPS?
Everyone had trouble at the final battle my OCed Q6600 and 4870 couldn't run it, it's a bug, you have to run at DX9 mode.

Reply to z999
- 0 +

jaguarskx wrote :

I actually read that it should be less demanding than Crysis.

Since I was able to play Crysis at medium settings @ 1920 x 1200 with my Radeon 1900XT 512MB, I expect Far Cry 2 should run fine. I didn't notice any low FPS in Crysis until the final battle when I had to fire at the belly of the beast; at which point I definitely noticed low FPS (probably mid-teens).

I typically play a stealth game in Crysis. I don't go in guns blazing unless I need to which could be why I don't really notice any sluggish performance until the end.



That is good to hear. I hope it is. Even if it is in between the original far cry and crysis I should be alright. :-) I tend to play stealth as well rather than going all crazy out in the open. That does tend to increase game performance and allow higher FPS rates. Thanks for the reply.

-- MaSoP

Reply to masop

z999 wrote :

WTF??? how can a X1900 handle crysis medium in such a high res????? how many FPS?
Everyone had trouble at the final battle my OCed Q6600 and 4870 couldn't run it, it's a bug, you have to run at DX9 mode.

 

Because he was using stealth. If he went in guns blazing throughout the entire game like I did he would have seen much lower frame rates. When you blow up buildings while shooting at 5-10 enemies who are shooting back, things get laggy. I know, because that happened to me a couple of times. Mainly since it was a lot of debris flying around, and the CPU must calculate all the physics for each piece of debris. Not to mention the GPU has to render all the flying debris.

 

BTW, I play at 1280x1024 all settings high and AA off since I only have DX9.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by soloman02 on 10-16-2008 at 05:32:36 AM
------------------------------ 3 more years to get my BSEE @ UNH :(
Intel E2200 @ 2.90Ghz (264x11) | 3GB DDR2 800 G.Skill (2x1GB, 2x512MB) | Gigabyte DS3L | Gigabyte 8800GT 512 @ 675/1566/900 | 160GB Seagate 7200rpm SATAII | Seasonic 500Watt SS-500ES | XP Pro
Reply to soloman02

Two words. DX 10.1

If AC is any indication of how DX10.1 can improve performance, FarCry2 could look just as good as Crysis and run a lot better on ATI cards. I need to start dusting off Vista...

Look at these demos....amazing
http://www.gametrailers.com/player [...] 18856.html

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by SpinachEater on 10-17-2008 at 03:50:08 PM
Reply to SpinachEater
- 0 +

soloman02 wrote :

Because he was using stealth. If he went in guns blazing throughout the entire game like I did he would have seen much lower frame rates. When you blow up buildings while shooting at 5-10 enemies who are shooting back, things get laggy. I know, because that happened to me a couple of times. Mainly since it was a lot of debris flying around, and the CPU must calculate all the physics for each piece of debris. Not to mention the GPU has to render all the flying debris.

BTW, I play at 1280x1024 all settings high and AA off since I only have DX9.



I've never even attempted at using any of the advanced features such as AA or TriLinear filtering, etc on any games thus far. I suppose I may tinker with it out of curiosity when I get FC2. The resolution I usually play at is 1024x768. I can't do 1280x1024 because my 19" widescreen samsung natively tops off at 1440x900. I suppose I could try selecting it by unchecking the option to reveal the unsupported resolutions listing, though it likely wouldn't look right.

It would be nice to have the option to be able to go into a slaughterfest with guns blazing without laggy frame rates, lol. :-) I'll never play any "good" game with anything other than medium settings at a minimum if at all possible. love the eye candy!

-- MaSoP

Reply to masop
- 0 +

SpinachEater wrote :

Two words. DX 10.1

If AC is any indication of how DX10.1 can improve performance, FarCry2 could look just as good as Crysis and run a lot better on ATI cards. I need to start dusting off Vista...

Look at these demos....amazing
http://www.gametrailers.com/player [...] 18856.html



I just won an auction on ebay for a Sapphire RadeOn x1950 Pro 256mb which I plan on saddling with my current x1950 for a Crossfire setup. I got it for a sweet price, $30 - 10% off plus $6 shipping. I wonder how that will help with games like Half-Life 2, Crysis and Far Cry 2? The benchmarks I've seen for x1900 xt cards in CF mode seems to pull anywhere from 10% to double the frame rates depending on the game, resolution and advanced settings used compared with a single x1950. This should be interesting once I get the setup in place.

-- MaSoP

Reply to masop

z999 wrote :

WTF??? how can a X1900 handle crysis medium in such a high res????? how many FPS?
Everyone had trouble at the final battle my OCed Q6600 and 4870 couldn't run it, it's a bug, you have to run at DX9 mode.



Yeah I have WinXP installed on my PC. It seems I need to update my sig since it is not listed.

I tend to use stealth in FPS games. I like to snipe my enemies (love heat shots) if possible and also use cloak at lot in dense foliage so that I can run in grab an enemy then throw him in the air so that the fall would kill him. Kinda like Predator; too bad there's no option for a knife in the game.

Don't know what my FPS is since I never bothered to check it.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | X1900XT 512MB | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi | WinXP

There is no such thing as a stupid question.
But there are stupid people.
Reply to jaguarskx
- 0 +

jaguarskx wrote :

Yeah I have WinXP installed on my PC. It seems I need to update my sig since it is not listed.

I tend to use stealth in FPS games. I like to snipe my enemies (love heat shots) if possible and also use cloak at lot in dense foliage so that I can run in grab an enemy then throw him in the air so that the fall would kill him. Kinda like Predator; too bad there's no option for a knife in the game.

Don't know what my FPS is since I never bothered to check it.



I wonder why they never added a knife as an option. That is a good question. :-)

-- MaSoP

Reply to masop

just got done doing some exploration in far cry 2 seeing how my FPS comes in...

I was pleasantly suprised running a qx9650 @ 3.6 with 3 8800gtxs with very high settings except high on post processing at anti 2x i was cranking in 76-82 fps @1080p....I could even vsync up and lock on 60 with zero lag. running the nvidia beta driver (first ran it with a 178.. with good results as well) 180 i found some extra stablity and a small fps boost. Anyone else having similar results? most of the benches i have seen only show a single 8800gtx and sli'd/cf 200 series/4870's.


Message edited by atomicWAR on 10-25-2008 at 12:46:26 AM
------------------------------ Anywho back on planet earth where chaos reign's supreme....

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6357314
Reply to atomicWAR

^You need to try Ultra High settings. Yes there are settings higher than very High in FC2. Just go to the Overall Settings box and select Ultra High.

With my setup I get 40FPS. Considering I have a single AT HD2900Pro 1GB thats freaking good for it on Ultra High, the rest that dont have Ultra High Very High and DX10.

------------------------------ http://www.steamcalculator.com/76561197970703804/camo_sig.png
Reply to jimmysmitty

ultra high dx 10 at anti 2x @1080 I average 30-36

------------------------------ Anywho back on planet earth where chaos reign's supreme....

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=6357314
Reply to atomicWAR

Although I am currently building a new machine, my old machine has a x1900xtx with a 1.63 dual core processor and 2 gig ddr2. I was really surprised by it's performance, and had it running on high settings with a very playable smooth frame-rate (can't remember the exact figue). Although I did tone done the fire effects to low. Hope this helps.

Reply to Anonymous

It wont help, seeing as the thread is 5 months old.

Reply to djcoolmasterx
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > Will my system handle Far Cry 2?
Go to:

There are 830 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Sponsored links