• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

News

Win 7 Desktop Graphics Loves Multi-core CPUs

Graphics performance is one of the most scrutinized part of modern computer systems. The Windows 7 team is working on boosting the upcoming operating system’s graphics performance. Read more

Intel aims for 32 cores by 2010

Five years ago, Intel envisioned processors running at 20 GHz by the end of this decade. Today we know that the future will look different. CPUs will sacrifice clock speed over core count: Intel's first "many core" CPU will run at only two thirds of the clock speed of today's fastest Xeon CPU - but achieve 15x the performance, thanks to 32 cores. Read more

Intel Announces Centrino 2

San Francisco (CA) - Intel today announced its latest Centrino platform - which oddly named Centrino 2, not just because it really is the fifth generation (and should be called Centrino 5), but also because its brains, the Core 2 Duo processor is just a refresh and may not have justified the new name by itself. Read more

Intel: A new architecture for the next decade

As expected, Intel announced at its developer forum a new processor architecture that will enable the company to capitalize on a growing need for power-efficient computing: A single architecture will deliver the ingredients for next-generation mobile, desktop and server processors. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Hard Drives, Yesterday And Today: From 500 GB To 1.5 TB

Hard Drives, Yesterday And Today: From 500 GB To 1.5 TB

Hard drive capacities have increased in large increments over the last few years, while trends indicate reduced spindle speeds of 5,400 RPM instead of 7,200. We looked at three generations of Samsung hard drives to analyze the performance ramifications. Read more

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: June '09

Best Graphics Cards For The Money: June '09

This month, ATI's new Radeon HD 4770 is missing in action, since online stores are not only unable to keep it in stock, but also de-listing it completely. With violent movements in pricing, though, it'd have been taken off the recommended list anyway. Read more

Editor's Corner: Nvidia’s Ion Revisited, 7.1 Ch. LPCM Fixed

Editor's Corner: Nvidia’s Ion Revisited, 7.1 Ch. LPCM Fixed

Nvidia's Ion for the do-it-yourselfer launched last month in the form of Zotac's mini-ITX motherboard. Though sexy in principle, the platform had some teething pains right out of the gate. Chris Angelini revisits those issues and uses Ion as a real HTPC. Read more

Core i7 Memory Scaling: From DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600

Core i7 Memory Scaling: From DDR3-800 to DDR3-1600

Do you want a quick Core i7 system, but don’t feel confident sticking to Intel's spec and using the DDR3-1066 memory supported by the processor? We benchmark the most relevant memory speed and timing combinations to check the benefit of going faster. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > multi threading: is it worth waiting?

multi threading: is it worth waiting?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Hi, apologies if this is repetitive thread or if there is a sticky somewhere but i've been having trouble finding any info on this.

Basically I have a phenom 9650 2.3Ghz quad core cpu but have read that most games don't use all the cores and so this processor for gaming is worse than say a dual core with a higher clock.

Just wondering if I can expect a rise in performance in the future as new games make use of multi-threading? Thinking in terms of future upgrades of my cpu...whether waiting around may be fruitful.

Cheers

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Oh boy.

------------------------------ +46.53 Pedantry/+75 Wingding Approval/+27 Vindictive bastard/+7 innovative violence/+11 Scouse trophies/Bastages WD:9 RC:4 AV:1 [specials; cluster:2,leather elbow patched:1,pre-approved:3,first class (upgrade):1,multi-thread:1,double-barrel:1]
Reply to llama_man

Any reason why you thought the "PC Gaming" or "CPU" forums weren't more appropriate than here?

------------------------------ +46.53 Pedantry/+75 Wingding Approval/+27 Vindictive bastard/+7 innovative violence/+11 Scouse trophies/Bastages WD:9 RC:4 AV:1 [specials; cluster:2,leather elbow patched:1,pre-approved:3,first class (upgrade):1,multi-thread:1,double-barrel:1]
Reply to llama_man

If your really interested in whether or not multi-cored CPUs will benefit your gaming experience do you a little research first because there's a ton of info out there.

In my opinion, yes at least a dual core but more is better. But I'm not going to get into much more detail than that because like I said there is tons of info out there on the subject and I would just be repeating what has been said hundreds of thousands of times before.

------------------------------ GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS4 v2.0
Intel Core2 Q6600 @ 3.3Ghz
4GB OCZ Reaper DDR2 800 @ 915Mhz
EVGA 8800GTS 512MB G92
Reply to purplerat

...so...you have a 3.0 GHz Quad, and want what, a 3.16 Duo??? I understand, a 2.4 Quad can lose to a 3.16 Duo, i get that argument. But there is no reason to drop two cores just for an extra 160 MHz.

Quads are actually slightly faster per clock anyway. The issue is the fact Duo's tend to be clocked higher by default. A Q9650 should be just as fast, if not faster, than the E8600 (that is the 3.16 one, right?) in almost everything you run, multithreaded or not.

Reply to gamerk316

reply to - Gamerk316, Yes more cores is better it takes the slack off the cpu for better performance yet in most reviews the E8600 can easy overclock to 4.5 - 5.0GHZ , this is impressive and due to many tests aganst the older quads (not i7) im talking Q6600 to Q9500+, the dual core overperforms but since ddr3 is getting more and more progressive and people are now tending to lean its way the quad-cores are also improveing (for example, the new i7 lineups) , i would tend to think that games are going to soon be muti-thread effective!. This is basicaly like you asking windows xp or vista when vista was just released (many stayed @ XP) but after just 3 months vista started to catch up on xp's sp2/sp3 performance and now i think its faster (for the peeps with the proper pc setups). So time will only tell all i would suggest is buying a cooler and if you got the quads with the unlocked muti-pliers (x12 etc), you shouldnt have a proplem overclocking and beening able to play games smooth. Now the new question you should be asking is windows 7 going to make windows actuly use the muti-cores properly? and if so theres youre answer quad-core and wait for the bentfields or quad-core EO stepping + to release (purchase) , GET soom good ram like dd2-pc28500 or dd3 1333+. Mostly i would suggest if you an extreme gamer like myself to purchase a gx2 9800 ( as if you go to nividias site , hit shop, go to the graphics card sector you will see it outperforms the 260 + 280 , so a single will do, until you got more doh to quad sli it!, once thats done any pc game you toss at the pc will play (emulators to play dos games tho :P). And even on the 9800gx2 note (i read on another forum how you can convert youre geforce into a quadro card) i would like to see a 9800 GX2 modded to that!. Intel may have the advantage on cpu's but amd/ati have the advantage on gfx's with the newly released gfx card. But the main thing if wanting a news gfx card to do is look at performing lists like the (nividias site-shop-gfx section) and pick one that suits you're needs remember engines in the gfx cards are very much different amd/ati had the uper hand on the halflife engines, so it realy depends on what game you paying and wanting to gain performance on.

Reply to bensheriff

Have you ever considered paragraphs? :D

------------------------------ +46.53 Pedantry/+75 Wingding Approval/+27 Vindictive bastard/+7 innovative violence/+11 Scouse trophies/Bastages WD:9 RC:4 AV:1 [specials; cluster:2,leather elbow patched:1,pre-approved:3,first class (upgrade):1,multi-thread:1,double-barrel:1]
Reply to llama_man
- 0 +

you don't consider that he's talking AMD, which means he'll probably get better performance form a dual core because their quads are pretty bad.

Reply to z999
- 0 +

I suggest you Overclock your Quad to about 2.6~2.7 and just sit tightly on it for the time being. You can get a small performance bump on a nice Athlon X2 at 3 Ghz or higher, but not enough to worry about. You will only see performance gains as time goes on. (I own both a Phenom and a Athlon X2 System)

Reply to w3iner
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Games General > PC Gaming > multi threading: is it worth waiting?
Go to:

There are 922 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread. Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links