Toms' Article on 655

Mac88

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2003
20
0
18,510
I just read the Tom's review on 655 ... I just acquired two weeks ago a MSI 655. I agree with many points but the final judgment on this card is very hard!
Not that I want to defend MSI because I bought it - but still I would like to add my experience on this.
- I wished to buy Gigabyte or Asus ... but they were impossible to find in the stores [and to take back to a website is not that easy] - for the 7205
- I tried the IWill P4GB - nice but not wonderful about perf and does not have ATA133, SATA, unstable about USB 2,
- So my choice went to 655 [better appreciation made by Anandtech that time ...] and again, Gigabyte, announced very good, was unavailable. I could get a MSI 655 - announced the fastest mobo [announced .. I know].

Why I like it?
- ATA 133, RAID - not on all 7205
- AGP 8X - not on i850 (i know perf today are same than 4X .. but why buy 4X when you can have 8X :D)
- 3 Firewire, Output Digital Optic&Component, Bluetooth => not on 7205 mobo (for the price !!! they could !!)
- moreover, it supports DDR400 - which for me will be more useful in 6/12 months when Intel will support also DDR400 than the DDR266 for the 7205... MSI announced above DDR333 .. I cannot run mu DDR433 - only at 400Mhz, but it's ok.
- my config, std config, runs well at CAS2, 200MHz, with OCZ PC3500 Cas2 dual channel, no overclocking. I tried to overclock - it's hard with the MSI - I only get it stable and working well at FSB 150MHz, DDR400, CAS2, VCore 1.625, DRAM Timing Normal... as said in the review, the bios doesn't really help, no reboot, block or reinit without a word - the dual bios is surely welcome on other mobo... so hard to overclock.

So I choose 655 because I was disappointed by the 7205 - very good perf but with not all the modern i/o - More stuff ? Yes but when Gigabyte doesn't provide Firewire port ... I would prefer Firewire port than dual boot or dual power for nothing (for the price of this kind of good config, I wanna rip my camcorder DVs!!)

A last point - those machine are made for high performance - in that case, talk about SpecViewPerf with Ti4600 is medium, when you have ATI 9700Pro (9800 soon), NVidia Quadro4 - vcard at the size of 7205/850 and 655 ...

So I disagree with the so hard arguments on the 655 mobo - my point of view... they are, for me again, a better way to get latest things a little bit cheaper than 7205... and with More than respectful perf !!
(It could be good to have the 850 with modern features ;) but...)

Mac88

P4 2.53 GHz\533 + ThermalTake 7+
1GB OCZ PC3500 EL Cas2 dual channel
Maxtor 120GB 8MB ATA133
NVidia Quadro4 980XGL
a lot of cool stuff around...
WXPSP1


<i><b><font color=green>When I think to know a lot of things, I begin to understand that I still have even more to learn...</font color=green></b></i> :wink:
 

LumberJack

Distinguished
Feb 13, 2003
655
0
18,980
I don't think you've been looking hard enough for the E7205 boards because I found mine really easy...

Try www.Ncix.com ! they have a lot of stuff....

To err is human... to really screw things up you need a computer!
 

juin

Distinguished
May 19, 2001
3,323
0
20,780
how much you have pay for you mobo 200$ something and that not even a ASUS.

a P4T533 cost 170$ Rimm 4200 cost the same as Corsair XMS it just leave you with lower perf and 2 year waiting for nothing.As even someone what buy there boards 1 year ago still have the best perf or the guy could have go for DDR I845D I845E I845PE E7050 SIS 655.Even before all of that I850 was avaible with PC 1066.After 2 generation of Dual DDR and 3 generation even more on AMD side I850E built in 2001 is still on the top.I guess we will have to wait the 3 generation Canterwood

[-peep-] french
 

Daikaiju

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2002
13
0
18,510
I was more than a little disappointed when i read the article. I too am very interested in the SiS655 and all reviews up until this one were very positive. Ok, so some could say that this is the exception and that with the majority of reviews being positive, it's not something to worry about, and normally i would agree.... Except Tom's review focussed on something that will be very important for me, namely the performance of the SiS655 with DDR333. I can't afford to replace my DDR333 with DDR400, so i was trying to find out how this chipset would perform with this ram, as all other reviews were using DDR400 or the somewhat superfluous DDR433. The results were rather grim reading for me, although i am not too worried about using aggressive timings with my ram providing i can overclock to a certain degree (i'd be happy to reach 150 fsb). Are the results from this article typical of the problems faced with a SiS655 and DDR333 combination? If so, i'm forced to reconcider my choice. Can anyone give me their experiences of using this board with DDR33?

Thanks.... D
 

bob_dn

Distinguished
Jun 27, 2002
284
0
18,780
You're right. ncix.com has a lot of stuff but they should at those prices!

$360 for a Gigabyte GA-8INXP!
$269 for the GA-SINXP1394!

WOW!

*EDIT*
OOPS! I didn't notice that maple leaf. These prices are Canadian.

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by bob_dn on 03/12/03 09:43 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

Daikaiju

Distinguished
Oct 14, 2002
13
0
18,510
That's still high even for Canadian!! Here in Nova Scotia (infamous for high prices on new hardware) i can get the 8INXP from my local store for $349 (wow, what a bargin!?!?). The damn E7205 is just way too expensive up here.
 

brick

Distinguished
Mar 13, 2003
3
0
18,510
I have a GA-SINXP1394 and i can run my ddr400 at 333MHz if i want to, i dont understand why they had problems with this mobo. My system is running great and stabil, no problems here.

<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Brick on 03/13/03 03:06 AM.</EM></FONT></P>
 

CrocHammer

Distinguished
Mar 13, 2003
1
0
18,510
Tom's had problems because they did not do their homework at all. It was probably one of the lamest reviews I have ever read. Pure fluff for the most part and devoid of researched facts. I have no idea where they got the Asus board overclocking to 200fsb. Check the Asus website and the board is limited to 166fsb. The Gigabyte board has done very well in overclocking on the other hand.

It's becoming a trend with Tom's Hardware, IMHO.

Unprofessional, lazy reporting as far as I am concerned.
 

Anotherone

Distinguished
Mar 12, 2003
3
0
18,510
I don't have any problem running DDRAM400 underclocked to 333 on GA-8SQ800 board, these are pair of TwinMOS 256MB. Also as 400MHz they run perfectly. I was also able to stable overclock my P4 2.0GHz to 131MHz FSB and RAM 425MHz. I have friend which runs GA-8SQ800 Ultra board with one stick of Apacer 333MHz memory without problems.
 

Mac88

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2003
20
0
18,510
I agree I could find the mobo on any website .. but I'm a store-buyer for many things (not everything...) and making my own PC with things I was new (7205, SiS655 and i850, DDR or RamBus), I prefered to find it in "local store" - I was right to do it as I changed my mobo for another one, the same for the DDR and I just changed my vcard - by Internet ? Forget - I will still be waiting for the parts back. I got all my configuration back in an evening! And still at US$190 the MSI 655... ah .. on the West coast too ...

Mac88

<i><b><font color=green>When I think to know a lot of things, I begin to understand that I still have even more to learn...</font color=green></b></i> :wink:
 

Mac88

Distinguished
Feb 21, 2003
20
0
18,510
Just for precision .. when I say 200MHz for the DDR - I sure mean 200MHz on dual channel = 400MHz - using DDR433 (I was hoping to run between 420 and 450 but unsuccessful...)
About 333 - I didn't try and I can do that but I don't see the matter as 400MHz works so well...

Mac88

<i><b><font color=green>When I think to know a lot of things, I begin to understand that I still have even more to learn...</font color=green></b></i> :wink: