Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)
Morning,
I am running Windows XP Pro and Microsoft Internet Explorer. When I go to a
site like http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw9.pdf and thry to open/download
the form I only get a blank page with a small box with a red X in it at the
upper left hand corner of the page. What do I need to do to allow this form
to open/download?
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 07:35:04 -0800, woodgc wrote:
> Morning,
>
> I am running Windows XP Pro and Microsoft Internet Explorer. When I go to a
> site like http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw9.pdf and thry to open/download
> the form I only get a blank page with a small box with a red X in it at the
> upper left hand corner of the page. What do I need to do to allow this form
> to open/download?
"woodgc" <woodgc@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7FE824D9-711B-4A4D-937B-0A0F6B90154E@microsoft.com...
> Morning,
>
> I am running Windows XP Pro and Microsoft Internet Explorer. When I go to
> a
> site like http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/fw9.pdf and thry to open/download
> the form I only get a blank page with a small box with a red X in it at
> the
> upper left hand corner of the page. What do I need to do to allow this
> form
> to open/download?
>
> Thank YOU
> Grover
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:43:10 +0530, "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <ramesh@online.mvps.org>
wrote:
There's also a 2nd problem with adobe reader. they've just upgraded from 6.0.1
to 7. and backwards compatibility is nonexistent. You MUST upgrade if you
frequent public sites that use pdf files. Old pdf's created with 6 will still
work, but there's no indication from the error you get what the actual problem
is.
Upgrade to v7 reader. it's free.
>
>Troubleshooting problems opening PDF files in Internet Explorer window:
>http://windowsxp.mvps.org/ie/pdf.htm
"Husky" <cbminfo@toast.net> wrote in message
news:lp4501honbh5ihmu506me768qvgk97ecvo@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:43:10 +0530, "Ramesh, MS-MVP"
> <ramesh@online.mvps.org>
> wrote:
>
> There's also a 2nd problem with adobe reader. they've just upgraded from
> 6.0.1
> to 7. and backwards compatibility is nonexistent. You MUST upgrade if you
> frequent public sites that use pdf files. Old pdf's created with 6 will
> still
> work, but there's no indication from the error you get what the actual
> problem
> is.
> Upgrade to v7 reader. it's free.
>
>>
>>Troubleshooting problems opening PDF files in Internet Explorer window:
>>http://windowsxp.mvps.org/ie/pdf.htm
>
> --
> more pix @ http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)
"Husky" <cbminfo@toast.net> wrote in message
news:lp4501honbh5ihmu506me768qvgk97ecvo@4ax.com
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:43:10 +0530, "Ramesh, MS-MVP"
> <ramesh@online.mvps.org> wrote:
>
> There's also a 2nd problem with adobe reader. they've just upgraded
> from 6.0.1 to 7. and backwards compatibility is nonexistent. You MUST
> upgrade if you frequent public sites that use pdf files. Old pdf's
> created with 6 will still work, but there's no indication from the
> error you get what the actual problem is.
> Upgrade to v7 reader. it's free.
Backwards compatibility is fine. Reader 7 opens Reader 6 files without a
problem.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)
> Frank Saunders, MS-MVPwrote: "Husky" <cbminfo@toast.net> wrote in message > news:lp4501honbh5ihmu506me768qvgk97ecvo@4ax.com > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:43:10 +0530, "Ramesh, MS-MVP" > ramesh@online.mvps.org> wrote: > > There's also a 2nd problem with adobe reader. they've just upgraded > from 6.0.1 to 7. and backwards compatibility is nonexistent. You MUST > upgrade if you frequent public sites that use pdf files. Old pdf's > created with 6 will still work, but there's no indication from the > error you get what the actual problem is. > Upgrade to v7 reader. it's free. > Backwards compatibility is fine. Reader 7 opens Reader 6 files without a problem.
We have a difference of opinion here. What I'm saying is that pdf reader 6.0.1 can't read pdf's crEated with adobe pdf maker 7. New PDFs; have made pdf reader 6.0.1 obsolete.
Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.newusers (More info?)
> Frank Saunders, MS-MVPwrote: "Husky" <cbminfo@toast.net> wrote in message > news:lp4501honbh5ihmu506me768qvgk97ecvo@4ax.com > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:43:10 +0530, "Ramesh, MS-MVP" > ramesh@online.mvps.org> wrote: > > There's also a 2nd problem with adobe reader. they've just upgraded > from 6.0.1 to 7. and backwards compatibility is nonexistent. You MUST > upgrade if you frequent public sites that use pdf files. Old pdf's > created with 6 will still work, but there's no indication from the > error you get what the actual problem is. > Upgrade to v7 reader. it's free. > Backwards compatibility is fine. Reader 7 opens Reader 6 files without a problem.
Though it's been more than a week since I posted the incompatibility problem. I can probably assume that TheWB hasn't changed the NEW PDF they created that chokes PDF 6 reader when used to print from the web. http://www.thewb.com/Faces/Poster/ [...] 7C,00.html This is the GOOD Beverley Mitchell link that works with pdf 6 reader. It's been up for a year or more. She has a lacy black off the shoulder top facing straight ahead.
I've already done the homework on this one. Unless you've upgraded to pdf reader 7, you got an error. I can't test it now as I upgraded to 7 when I found pdf had upgraded. It happened both online from the public library, and from my home computer. Before I upgraded. 6.0.1 can NOT read a pdf created by 7. I even tried it offline. It saves to disk with right cliock save just fine, just can't do anything with it. Maybe there's been a fix in adobe 7 pdf maker. This was weeks ago that nothing worked to open it to printer.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.