nForce2 vs. KT400A

[TKH]

<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.html?i=1807" target="_new">http://www.anandtech.com/mb/showdoc.html?i=1807</A>
nForce2 in dual-ch DDR still beats KT400A in every aspect, what the hell is VIA doing with all the money they have made?

You never know how stupid you are until you have done something stupid enough for you to realize it.
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/mysystemrig.html?id=22996" target="_new">My System Rig</A>

 

[Crashman]

VIA uses that money to buy out bankrupt companies who used to make junk products so they can add those junk features to their own product line.

<font color=blue>Watts mean squat if you don't have quality!</font color=blue>

 

[TKH]

I know you'll say this
I really want to listen to what VIA would say in response to dual-ch ddr is really more advance than single-ch ddr. VIA is so confidence to their single-ch ddr, but even Intel has given up RDRAM and move to dual-ch ddr, KT400A is another stupid move in relative to memory bandwidth. And Gigabyte is once again screwed by VIA.

You never know how stupid you are until you have done something stupid enough for you to realize it.
<A HREF="http://www.anandtech.com/mysystemrig.html?id=22996" target="_new">My System Rig</A>