Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Video Games > PC Gaming > Post your best Dirt 2 benchmarks here (DX9-DX10-DX11)

Post your best Dirt 2 benchmarks here (DX9-DX10-DX11)

Forum Video Games : PC Gaming Post your best Dirt 2 benchmarks here (DX9-DX10-DX11)

Page:    Previous 1 2 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

Is your system up to the task? If so please post your min and max framerate [:jaydeejohn:5]

Here is my best (x4 B50 @ 3.9Ghz / GTX 260 @ 655/1220) 1680x 1050 everything on "HIGH" including x16AA :

http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/th_SANY0147.jpg

Max FPS = 80
Min FPS = 59


Message edited by OvrClkr on 02-02-2010 at 02:06:15 AM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr
Register or log in to remove.

I would but not sure how to attach pic to my post,but what i have noticed about your pic,on multisampling you have the letters CSAA,on mine i have MSAA,is there a difference?,also mine only goes up to 8xMSAA not 16


Message edited by andy_93 on 01-27-2010 at 02:53:24 AM
Reply to andy_93

To attach the pic you need to use Photobucket.com or ImageShack.com

As far as the xAA settings go, it depends on the GPU that you use..

CSAA gives roughly the same quality for less of a performance hit...

IQ- SSAA>MSAA>CSAA
Performance- CSAA>MSAA>SSAA

If you want to read more into it, read the next few pages of this AnandTech.com article http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] i=2870&p=9

=)

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Thanks for that OvrClkr,ill check out that link and post my benchmarks very soon.

Reply to andy_93

sweet =) .....

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

I was running Fraps while doing the benchmark,dont know if that makes any difference to frame rate.Cant get any pictures on here,uploaded the on Imageshack but it wont let me edit the post so that i can attach pictures.I can only quick edit


Message edited by andy_93 on 01-27-2010 at 10:57:20 PM
Reply to andy_93

i7 920 3.8GHz, GTX295 OC(633/1364/1100)

1920x1200, 4xMSAA, Ultra settings
http://img682.imageshack.us/img682/5836/dirt2game20100123135042.jpg

Reply to michaelmk86

NICE^^^ LoL

I bet the game looks awesome at 1920x1200 =)

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

just tried again,but it wont do it aarrrggggggggg


Message edited by andy_93 on 01-28-2010 at 09:38:50 PM
Reply to andy_93

http://img693.imageshack.us/img693/4508/dirt2game20100127213614.png


http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/3881/dirt2game20100127213421.png


http://img691.imageshack.us/img691/1488/dirt2game20100127213406.png


Whoo done it lol,this is with Fraps running,dont know if that makes any difference in performance.


Message edited by andy_93 on 01-28-2010 at 09:46:10 PM
Reply to andy_93

nice =)

I like the fact that the game runs soo smooth with no lag whatsoever.....

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

It took a while but got there in the end lol,cheers

Reply to andy_93

here my results,,..avrg=46fps , min=38fps ,th is with everything set to highest and some ultra settings as dx9,,@12x10 ,,system specs below

------------------------------ cpu: e5300@2.86ghz (stock cooler)
ram: 2gb 667@733
gpu: Sapphire HD5770 1gb GDDR5
psu: cit 700w
Reply to pkw4

pkw4 wrote :

here my results,,..avrg=46fps , min=38fps ,th is with everything set to highest and some ultra settings as dx9,,@12x10 ,,system specs below



Not bad at all considering you are running at 2.9Ghz..... good job [:jaydeejohn:5]

going for another run brb.....


Message edited by OvrClkr on 01-29-2010 at 05:55:39 AM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

whoops sorry ,,thoese results where at 2.6ghz (stock) , at 2.9ghz i get avrg=51 and min=44, these are at the same settings.

------------------------------ cpu: e5300@2.86ghz (stock cooler)
ram: 2gb 667@733
gpu: Sapphire HD5770 1gb GDDR5
psu: cit 700w
Reply to pkw4

i do not use anti-aliasing or anistrop filtering as a 96 would get crippled lol

------------------------------ cpu: e5300@2.86ghz (stock cooler)
ram: 2gb 667@733
gpu: Sapphire HD5770 1gb GDDR5
psu: cit 700w
Reply to pkw4

With everything on ultra setings and x16AA i get around 60FPS max / 54FPS min, so that is not bad at all considering it's at its highest settings possible for a 260.

http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/dirt22010-01-3017-24-57-95.jpg

Of course this is done with v-sync enabled ;)

Now going to test w/o v-sync ....brb

w/o v-sync

http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/dirt22010-01-3017-58-18-35.jpg

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by OvrClkr on 01-31-2010 at 01:53:35 AM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Thats not bad at all,its very playable at those fps and is that with a single 260?

Reply to andy_93

yep ........

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

andy_93 wrote :

Thats not bad at all,its very playable at those fps and is that with a single 260?




yep.......

http://i683.photobucket.com/albums [...] le_260.png

http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/single_260.png

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

OvrClkr wrote :

With everything on ultra setings and x16AA i get around 60FPS max / 54FPS min, so that is not bad at all considering it's at its highest settings possible for a 260.

 

http://i683.photobucket.com/albums [...] -57-95.jpg

 

Of course this is done with v-sync enabled ;)

 

Now going to test w/o v-sync ....brb

 

w/o v-sync

 

http://i683.photobucket.com/albums [...] -18-35.jpg


These screenshots are without AA let alone the 16xAA. Also the 64fps is normal performance for a single GTX260 with these settings 1680x1050, no AA, Ultra settings. Now a single GTX260 will get about 40fps with 16xCSAA.

 

You have done the same thing with the crysis. Do you remember when you said that you get 42-50fps in crysis with 1680x1050 4xAA enthusiast DX10 and in the end we find out that your true fps are 24min and 34avg with 1680x1050, no AA, enthusias, DX10.

 

Really I don’t understand why you give fake results? Does this help you to sleep at night?


Message edited by michaelmk86 on 02-01-2010 at 02:35:47 PM
Reply to michaelmk86

Quote :

[These screenshots are without AA let alone the 16xAA. Also the 64fps is normal performance for a single GTX260 with these settings 1680x1050, no AA, Ultra settings. Now a single GTX260 will get about 40fps with 16xCSAA.
/quote]

Look at the top video, it clearly shows 60-80FPS with all settings on "HIGH" including x16AA @1680x 1050.

[quote]and in the end we find out that your true fps are 24min and 34avg with 1680x1050, no AA, enthusias, DX10.



Nonsense :lol: , who found out what? I just started using DX10 about 2 weeks ago so the DX10 argument is totally false. I have yet to test Warhead in Win 7 64bit, the only Warhead benchmarks i have were done with XP Pro 32bit.

I never stated that i get between 42-50FPS with x4AA, that is ubsurd since a single 260 cannot achieve such results. I stated that I can get anywhere from 50-80FPS with all settings on enthusiast and NO xAA. I will do another Warhead benchmark once installed and post a new video ;)


Message edited by OvrClkr on 02-02-2010 at 01:13:07 AM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Quote :

These screenshots are without AA let alone the 16xAA. Also the 64fps is normal performance for a single GTX260 with these settings 1680x1050, no AA, Ultra settings. Now a single GTX260 will get about 40fps with 16xCSAA.



Look at the TOP video, it clearly shows 60-80FPS with all settings on "HIGH" including x16AA (1680x 1050) w/ v-sync off.

With v-sync enabled I get a constant 60FPS and if I change all settings to ULTRA i still manage to get 54FPS min and 60FPS max.....

Here is another video :

http://s683.photobucket.com/albums [...] NY0160.flv

http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/th_SANY0160.jpg


Message edited by OvrClkr on 02-02-2010 at 02:09:30 AM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

The video that you show is from the demo not from the full game. The benchmark on the demo gives more fps than the benchmark on the full game. Also you do not use 16xAA because there is no anti-aliasing on the benchmark you posted and the proof is that dirt 2 renders the menu and when anti-aliasing is disabled you can see it in the letters, which are full of jaggies so stop lying.
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 508-7.html
Benchmark from tomshardware: the GTX260 with ultra setting, DX9, 4xAA, 1680x1050, fps 52avg, 40min.

 

In crysis you cannot get this fps(50-80) with enthusiast and 1680x1050. Crysis wouldn’t have this kind of reputation if graphics card’s like yours could max it out with this insane fps(50-80).

 



bechmark with the GTX260.
1680x1050, DX9, 0xAA, gamer settings(not even enthusiast settings).
Results: 38fps avg, 25fps min absolutely not anywhere near to 50-80fps…
www. hardwarecanucks .com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/24216-asus-radeon-hd-5770-1gb-voltage-tweak-edition-review-11.html

 

http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1439/PreviewComp/SuperStock_1439R-1072235.jpg
LIAR

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by michaelmk86 on 02-02-2010 at 10:28:18 AM
Reply to michaelmk86

.


Message edited by michaelmk86 on 02-02-2010 at 10:24:37 AM
Reply to michaelmk86

michaelmk86 wrote :

The video that you show is from the demo not from the full game. The benchmark on the demo gives more fps than the benchmark on the full game. Also you do not use 16xAA because there is no anti-aliasing on the benchmark you posted and the proof is that dirt 2 renders the menu and when anti-aliasing is disabled you can see it in the letters, which are full of jaggies so stop lying.
http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 508-7.html
Benchmark from tomshardware: the GTX260 with ultra setting, DX9, 4xAA, 1680x1050, fps 52avg, 40min.

In crysis you cannot get this fps(50-80) with enthusiast and 1680x1050. Crysis wouldn’t have this kind of reputation if graphics card’s like yours could max it out with this insane fps(50-80).



bechmark with the GTX260.
1680x1050, DX9, 0xAA, gamer settings(not even enthusiast settings).
Results: 38fps avg, 25fps min absolutely not anywhere near to 50-80fps…
www. hardwarecanucks .com/forum/hardware-canucks-reviews/24216-asus-radeon-hd-5770-1gb-voltage-tweak-edition-review-11.html

http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/ [...] 072235.jpg
LIAR



You are correct, the first video is the DEMO, but if you look at the video above you will see a more legit benchmark from the full version. The demo does not provide more FPS, not sure where you got that from cause I get higher FPS with the full version.

Here is the old Crysis video, I have more videos from different scenes that I still have to upload.

http://s683.photobucket.com/albums [...] sFPS-1.flv


------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

First of all I am not playing the game in DX9, second I do not have my CPU at 3Ghz (like the test shows) I have my CPU at 3.9Ghz, and the GPU is at 655/1280. You got a special pair of nuts for calling me a liar even when I provide you with videos that show every single setting in detail.

Anyways I am giving you proof, the x16 is enabled in the benchmark. There are NO jaged edges once x16 and v-sync are enabled.....

Tonight I will post an IN-GAME benchmark, just so you can see that I get he same exact FPS as opposed to the menu "benchmark". And then after that I am done with you ;)


Message edited by OvrClkr on 02-02-2010 at 04:38:18 PM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

I think this is getting a little out of hand,its only a game,and i have to be honest here,i run the game @1920x1200 with 8xMSAA(because its ATI) and v-sync and i still get jagged lines in the text.

Reply to andy_93

andy_93 wrote :

I think this is getting a little out of hand,its only a game,and i have to be honest here,i run the game @1920x1200 with 8xMSAA(because its ATI) and v-sync and i still get jagged lines in the text.



Yea, well I don't know of any other way to provide proof of my specs/benchmarks.......

First I posted a video and got a few posts saying that I was running something more powerfull than a 260... Now in all my videos I point my camera at the case for proofing reasons. Not sure what else I can do to prove the frames I get with a single 260. Anyways I will post few more videos tonight ;)

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Hey,i beleive you,what would be the point in lieing,i just asked if it was a single card because i am running 2 4870 in CF and your benchmarks are not far of mine,but that could be for many reasons,your processor is running higher than mine for starters,i dont feel like you have to prove anything,you have posted your benchmarks and that it,lets get back to the subject of your orignial post and not prove whos lieing and who is not,i think that your screenshots and videos speak for them selves ;)

Reply to andy_93

While I acknowledge your courage, and candor, OvrClkr, I can't beleive you posted up a Crysis video, with a BSOD at the end.... made me rofl, in the bad way.

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 3.7Ghz - 12GB Corsair XM3 - 120 GB OCZ Vertex Turbo SSD - 2TB WD Black - SLI GTX 580 - Xonar DX - Zalman 850W - Blu-Ray Drive - Thor's Hammer - Obsidian 800D - 3X Asus 120Hz LCD (Nvidia Surround) -
Reply to Annisman

well that was the whole point, max everything out to squeeze the last bit of oomph!!

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

OvrClkr wrote :

You are correct, the first video is the DEMO, but if you look at the video above you will see a more legit benchmark from the full version. The demo does not provide more FPS, not sure where you got that from cause I get higher FPS with the full version.

Here is the old Crysis video, I have more videos from different scenes that I still have to upload.

http://s683.photobucket.com/albums [...] sFPS-1.flv


A GTX260 simply is not capable to deliver that performance simple as that. (Also the screenshot that you post show that you don’t have AA)

Even 2x GTX260 cannot get this fps(50-80) in crysis warhead with 1680x1050 enthusiast. Also doesn’t matter if you have your CPU at 3.9GHz(especially with one GTX260).

Really I don’t understand why you saying this lies.

Reply to michaelmk86

For what it's worth, it did look like he was getting great fps, with a single gtx 260, in Crysis, even without AA the results were excellent. That is of course, before he blue screened ^^

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 3.7Ghz - 12GB Corsair XM3 - 120 GB OCZ Vertex Turbo SSD - 2TB WD Black - SLI GTX 580 - Xonar DX - Zalman 850W - Blu-Ray Drive - Thor's Hammer - Obsidian 800D - 3X Asus 120Hz LCD (Nvidia Surround) -
Reply to Annisman

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dYkzwsD4S3k

the dam upload on youtube takes forever, brb.. uploading more videos....

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Here you go, you believe what you want ;)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9sEqSXixH8

v-sync OFF / Ultra Settings / x16CSAA


Message edited by OvrClkr on 02-09-2010 at 08:41:27 AM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Hey good video,how the hell you play with keys tho,and i gotta say,it looks like your single 260 runs Dirt2 better than my 2 4870`s.

Reply to andy_93

Practice, I normally use the gamepad but with the keyboard it is more of a challenge....

I have a buddy that is gettin a bit more frames than me with a single 4890... not sure what the deal is....

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Wait, are you saying you use a keyboard/gamepad for Dirt2 or Crysis? I can't imagine doing Dirt2 without a wheel/pedals with force feedback.

------------------------------ 4 x AMD 6172 > Tyan S8812 > 32GB > X-1050 | i7 970 > P6X58D-E > 7970 3GB > 24GB | i7 3770k > P8Z77-V Pro > Classified 580 3GB > 16GB

http://piro.pirocast.net/badge/none/fah02/800/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/255/255/255/557101.png
Reply to EXT64

andy_93 wrote :

Hey good video,how the hell you play with keys tho,and i gotta say,it looks like your single 260 runs Dirt2 better than my 2 4870`s.



Im not sure whats going on, I am waiting on Fermi and the new 5830 (cross-fired) , hopefully Fermi will be worth the cost, if not then dual 5830's should be more than enough for my gaming needs. Once I get my hands on either i will bench again in DX11 just to see the performance hit and compare numbers. I think that the game runs better (performance-wise) on Dx10 rather than 9 or 11. Win 7 64bit also helps with allocating more ram as well ;) , I have another buddy (neighbor) that has dual 275's and he is gettin over 100FPS with the same settings as me, 121 max 97 min @ x16QSAA (1680x 1050) to be exact :)

Im fine with a constant 60FPS with all the eye-candy.... I am very impressed with the quality of gameplay this game provides, I am a Grand Turismo fan and this game just smokes it in every way.... And the fact that a PC obliterates the"console" when it comes to visuals....


Message edited by OvrClkr on 02-10-2010 at 06:32:19 AM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

I agree with you 100% on Gameplay. As for DX11 (assuming I'm turning it on correctly, I guess it just happens if you have a DX11 card on Ultra settings) it does introduce a hit, but a bearable one normally. The weird thing is it used to really slow down in places, so I turned down GFX settings. Then I decided to turn it back up again and now it seems to run fine (no slowdowns). I can't think of what I changed inbetween, other than some windows updates perhaps.

------------------------------ 4 x AMD 6172 > Tyan S8812 > 32GB > X-1050 | i7 970 > P6X58D-E > 7970 3GB > 24GB | i7 3770k > P8Z77-V Pro > Classified 580 3GB > 16GB

http://piro.pirocast.net/badge/none/fah02/800/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/255/255/255/557101.png
Reply to EXT64

Avg. 52.3fps....using the inbuilt benchmark...system:
Phenom X3 8450@2.2Ghz
Sapphire Hd 4890
4GB DDR2 @810Mhz
Windows 7 Ultimate x64

settings:Res:1440x900:8x AA
all possible highest settings using 4890

Reply to sayantan

EXT64 wrote :

Wait, are you saying you use a keyboard/gamepad for Dirt2 or Crysis? I can't imagine doing Dirt2 without a wheel/pedals with force feedback.



I use the keyboard when it comes to shooters.. As far as driving simulators on the PC, I use both the keyboard and the gamepad. Same for PS3, if im going to play MW2 or any other FPS i use the adapter/keyboard/mouse ;) and pwn everyone in sight...

Have not used a wheel on the PC yet, what wheel do you have? Link?

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

sayantan wrote :

Avg. 52.3fps....using the inbuilt benchmark...system:
Phenom X3 8450@2.2Ghz
Sapphire Hd 4890
4GB DDR2 @810Mhz
Windows 7 Ultimate x64

settings:Res:1440x900:8x AA
all possible highest settings using 4890



Why are you running the game at 2.2Ghz? And how did you manage to average 52FPS at that clock?

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by OvrClkr on 02-10-2010 at 05:36:44 PM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

I got really lucky on the wheel actually. It is an old PS2 wheel (bought for GT4) and although not officially supported by Dirt2, Logitech still includes it in their PC drivers, so it works. It has all the essentials like a strong force feedback, paddle shifters, and a few buttons. I do periodically have issues where it stops working in game (or randomly gets really "loose" ) but most of the time it works great. It really lets you get finesse and a feel for the road (or in this case, dirt).

------------------------------ 4 x AMD 6172 > Tyan S8812 > 32GB > X-1050 | i7 970 > P6X58D-E > 7970 3GB > 24GB | i7 3770k > P8Z77-V Pro > Classified 580 3GB > 16GB

http://piro.pirocast.net/badge/none/fah02/800/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/255/255/255/557101.png
Reply to EXT64

OvrClkr wrote :

Why are you running the game at 2.2Ghz? And how did you manage to average 52FPS at that clock?




Some people may not know how to overclock.... OvrClkr....

------------------------------ Core i7 920 @ 3.7Ghz - 12GB Corsair XM3 - 120 GB OCZ Vertex Turbo SSD - 2TB WD Black - SLI GTX 580 - Xonar DX - Zalman 850W - Blu-Ray Drive - Thor's Hammer - Obsidian 800D - 3X Asus 120Hz LCD (Nvidia Surround) -
Reply to Annisman

Yea, just used to seeing the "Phenoms" at higher clocks, specially when used for gaming. The 8450 should be able to at least achieve 2.6Ghz...

------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr

Dirt 2 will run automatically in DX11 if your card supports it,but it does not run in DX10,only 9 or 11 and it does seem to run better in DX9,ive seen the game run in both and tbh there is not that much difference,i think that Codemasters rushed it to include DX11 features and in reality there are not that many,just water and the way the flags blow in the breeze from what i have seen.

Reply to andy_93

Yeah, from the previews I saw, DX11 does add some nice (but not very noticeable at all) improvements; however, the performance hit is large compared to the benefits. it is amazing what they did with DX9 though.

------------------------------ 4 x AMD 6172 > Tyan S8812 > 32GB > X-1050 | i7 970 > P6X58D-E > 7970 3GB > 24GB | i7 3770k > P8Z77-V Pro > Classified 580 3GB > 16GB

http://piro.pirocast.net/badge/none/fah02/800/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/0/255/255/255/557101.png
Reply to EXT64

andy_93 wrote :

Dirt 2 will run automatically in DX11 if your card supports it,but it does not run in DX10,only 9 or 11 and it does seem to run better in DX9,ive seen the game run in both and tbh there is not that much difference,i think that Codemasters rushed it to include DX11 features and in reality there are not that many,just water and the way the flags blow in the breeze from what i have seen.



Ok so let me get this strait, im definately not using DX9 because im running Win 7, and I cannot be running DX11 cause my card does not support it... so what am I running?

DX DIAG indicates that im running DX11.... But am I ? :lol:


Message edited by OvrClkr on 02-11-2010 at 01:39:23 AM
------------------------------ http://i683.photobucket.com/albums/vv199/OvrClkr/mod.png
Reply to OvrClkr
Register or log in to remove.
Previous
1 2
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Video Games > PC Gaming > Post your best Dirt 2 benchmarks here (DX9-DX10-DX11)
Go to:

There are 1493 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Diablo 3
By DM186, 5 hours ago:

That kinda sound normal. When I play Shogun 2 total war. When I am on the campain map I...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts