Ok...Is it just me, or it looks like Asus are lowering his quality standard? I look at the posts here, and most of the time, they are Asus related. Do they botch their work in order to meet dead line. I dumped Asus in favor of Soltek for my AMD built. I'm more than pleased with that. Not a single one failed. But I consider Abit and MSI too, even if 1 MSI board get replaced 4 times in one machine. Even ECS prove to be more reliable than Asus (was bought to replace an old Asus board...)...One ECS machine, boot first time, XP install first time..running great since.
When nforce3 250 board will be more common, and I'll start building machine based on, that wont be Asus .
Ok, I know that they sell more board, and that mean more problems might happen... I could expect DOA board, but half working board (they post, but install is a real challenge) are sign of loosy design.
Maybe it is just my impression ...
-Always put the blame on you first, then on the hardware !!!
When nforce3 250 board will be more common, and I'll start building machine based on, that wont be Asus .
Ok, I know that they sell more board, and that mean more problems might happen... I could expect DOA board, but half working board (they post, but install is a real challenge) are sign of loosy design.
Maybe it is just my impression ...
-Always put the blame on you first, then on the hardware !!!