Currently i'm running a 22 and a 19 in wide screen off of a 4870 512mb ati gpu. I'm wanting to run 2 instances of eq2, one on each monitor, as well as ACT, Outlook, ie and anything else i feel like in the background. I'm doing this now, but i'm getting a bit of a hit on the graphics performance. on my 22 (1680x1050) i'm getting 15-30 fps, on the 19 (1440x900) i'm getting 20-50 fps. I'm running in Raid performance (ui: profitui video choice) on both instances of eq2. I'd like to hit 30 fps on two 24 in monitors running 1920x1080 running at a higher graphics quality, and i didn't know what it'd take to do that. In my current system (motherboard) i can not upgrade to two graphics cards (assuming i could somehow assign 1 game to each card...rather then using crossfire...which i'm not sure you can do).
I've heard people talk about running at highest quality on their computers...and while i can do that on one monitor, on two it runs pretty badly. Being a convert from fps's (first person shooters), i like my fps (frames per sec) to be high, lag drives me crazy. So, my 4870, has 512mb onboard... Is the gpu onboard ram possibly the limitation, or is the gpu processor a limitation? Or is my only option to buy a new motherboard dual+ 2.0 pci-e slot board and throw in a second ati card?
Right now, 1 instance of the game will use up to 1.8 gb of ram and up to 1.5 cores during special instances. Typically the game runs about 750-900 mb and 1.1-1.2 cores. You would think that running two instances would then double the maxes of both of those... However it doesn't. The ram stays about right, but the cpu usage drops way out. The cpu usage will peg out about 1 core on whichever i'm using, then the other drops to about half a core. Additionally, "ACT" runs in the background at all times, which eats up to 1 core and up to 2 gb of ram depending on how much data has been pumped in to it. ACT is a database program which keeps track of everything that goes on in one of my EQ2 windows and provides some additional functionality. Most of the time ACT uses less then 10% of a core and under 300 mb of ram.
I'm about to upgrade to Win 7 64, which has better multithreading functionality, but i'm not really sure it's going to be my savior in this case.
Specs:
q6600 @ 3.0ghz (quad processor, oc'd from 2.4 to 3.0)
8gb of ram running at 1000 mhz
xp 64
4870 512mb
10k c: drive
raid 5 7.2k (4 hd's) D: drive (running 2 instances of eq2 from D atm)
I've heard people talk about running at highest quality on their computers...and while i can do that on one monitor, on two it runs pretty badly. Being a convert from fps's (first person shooters), i like my fps (frames per sec) to be high, lag drives me crazy. So, my 4870, has 512mb onboard... Is the gpu onboard ram possibly the limitation, or is the gpu processor a limitation? Or is my only option to buy a new motherboard dual+ 2.0 pci-e slot board and throw in a second ati card?
Right now, 1 instance of the game will use up to 1.8 gb of ram and up to 1.5 cores during special instances. Typically the game runs about 750-900 mb and 1.1-1.2 cores. You would think that running two instances would then double the maxes of both of those... However it doesn't. The ram stays about right, but the cpu usage drops way out. The cpu usage will peg out about 1 core on whichever i'm using, then the other drops to about half a core. Additionally, "ACT" runs in the background at all times, which eats up to 1 core and up to 2 gb of ram depending on how much data has been pumped in to it. ACT is a database program which keeps track of everything that goes on in one of my EQ2 windows and provides some additional functionality. Most of the time ACT uses less then 10% of a core and under 300 mb of ram.
I'm about to upgrade to Win 7 64, which has better multithreading functionality, but i'm not really sure it's going to be my savior in this case.
Specs:
q6600 @ 3.0ghz (quad processor, oc'd from 2.4 to 3.0)
8gb of ram running at 1000 mhz
xp 64
4870 512mb
10k c: drive
raid 5 7.2k (4 hd's) D: drive (running 2 instances of eq2 from D atm)