Are these good results?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

Here is my system:
Athlon 64 FX-53 (not overclocked... 2.4Ghz)
ATI X800 Pro (not overclocked except for built in "Overdrive" option)
1GB DDR400 RAM
32GB 10,000RPM SCSI HD
On-board Audio
Windows XP
-------------------------
My timedemo results were:
62.5 on High Quality, V-Sync off, No FSAA and 1024x768

55.7 with same settings as above but with 2x FSAA
-----------------------------

Are these normal for a system like mine? Are they low? Nothing is
overclocked.

-TIA

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

"Drew C" <drew@drewclayton.com> wrote in message
news:cme0gq$5dp1$1@news3.infoave.net...
> Here is my system:
> Athlon 64 FX-53 (not overclocked... 2.4Ghz)
> ATI X800 Pro (not overclocked except for built in "Overdrive" option)
> 1GB DDR400 RAM
> 32GB 10,000RPM SCSI HD
> On-board Audio
> Windows XP
> -------------------------
> My timedemo results were:
> 62.5 on High Quality, V-Sync off, No FSAA and 1024x768
>
> 55.7 with same settings as above but with 2x FSAA
> -----------------------------
>
> Are these normal for a system like mine? Are they low? Nothing is
> overclocked.
>
> -TIA
>

I couldn't be sure, since I don't have the same hardware config, but since
this place seems slow lately... I might as well list my spec and framerate
for general comparison.


P4 3.0Ghz, 1MB, Hyperthreading, 800Mhz FSB
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB (2.5.90 Omega Drivers - they are faster in Doom3
by 12fps on my system)
1GB DDR400 Dual Channel RAM
Creative soundblaster 64? (some old model, don't even remember)
XP Pro
etc

I score 59.9fps in the timedemo. This is while Doom 3 is configured to High
Quality, 800x600 - everything on in the advanced tab except AA. (This is of
course unless the time demo changes the config to provide a universal test)


Tada, how fun...

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

SLow this place is dead , everyone finished doom 3 and moved on.



On Fri, 5 Nov 2004 00:45:53 -0000, "The Berzerker"
<Berzerker@wooooooo.com> wrote:

>"Drew C" <drew@drewclayton.com> wrote in message
>news:cme0gq$5dp1$1@news3.infoave.net...
>> Here is my system:
>> Athlon 64 FX-53 (not overclocked... 2.4Ghz)
>> ATI X800 Pro (not overclocked except for built in "Overdrive" option)
>> 1GB DDR400 RAM
>> 32GB 10,000RPM SCSI HD
>> On-board Audio
>> Windows XP
>> -------------------------
>> My timedemo results were:
>> 62.5 on High Quality, V-Sync off, No FSAA and 1024x768
>>
>> 55.7 with same settings as above but with 2x FSAA
>> -----------------------------
>>
>> Are these normal for a system like mine? Are they low? Nothing is
>> overclocked.
>>
>> -TIA
>>
>
>I couldn't be sure, since I don't have the same hardware config, but since
>this place seems slow lately... I might as well list my spec and framerate
>for general comparison.
>
>
>P4 3.0Ghz, 1MB, Hyperthreading, 800Mhz FSB
>ATI Radeon 9800 Pro 128MB (2.5.90 Omega Drivers - they are faster in Doom3
>by 12fps on my system)
>1GB DDR400 Dual Channel RAM
>Creative soundblaster 64? (some old model, don't even remember)
>XP Pro
>etc
>
>I score 59.9fps in the timedemo. This is while Doom 3 is configured to High
>Quality, 800x600 - everything on in the advanced tab except AA. (This is of
>course unless the time demo changes the config to provide a universal test)
>
>
>Tada, how fun...
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 13:39:15 -0600, "Drew C" <drew@drewclayton.com>
wrote:

>Here is my system:
>Athlon 64 FX-53 (not overclocked... 2.4Ghz)
>ATI X800 Pro (not overclocked except for built in "Overdrive" option)
>1GB DDR400 RAM
>32GB 10,000RPM SCSI HD
>On-board Audio
>Windows XP
>-------------------------
>My timedemo results were:
>62.5 on High Quality, V-Sync off, No FSAA and 1024x768
>
>55.7 with same settings as above but with 2x FSAA
>-----------------------------
>
>Are these normal for a system like mine? Are they low? Nothing is
>overclocked.
>
>-TIA
>

Chip: Intel P4E 3.2 Prescott @ 3.52 MHz. 1 MB L-2 cache (core voltage
@ 1.392, stock hs and fan).
FSB: @ 4 x 220 = 880MHz
Mobo: Asus P4C800-E Deluxe
PS: Enermax 450 w
RAM: 2x Corsair CMX512-4000 Extreme DDR SDRAM PC4000 (250 MHz)
Video Card: Albatron GeForce 6800GT 256 DDR3 350/1.0 (no OC)
Settings: Application Controlled
Vid Drivers: 61.77
DirectX Version 9.0c
Fastwrites: Enabled
Side-band Addressing: Enabled
AGP Aperture: 128 MB
HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5 Raid Array
HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
Sound Card: Creative Audigy2 ZS w/ Creative 5300 5.1 speakers
OS: Win XP-1
Case: Luan Li alum/435 ATXmed (black)
Monitor: Sony PREMIERPRO 23" Wide Screen Flat Panel LCD SDM-234/B @
"1920x1200x72Hz" DVI-D (Primary)
Monitor: NEC MultiSync LCD 1850E @ "1280x1024 @ 72Hz" Analog
(Secondary)
Mouse: Logitech MX-Laser 1000 w/ func gaming pad

Results:

1600x1200 High no aa 52 fps
1024x768 High no aa 72 fps
800x600 High no aa 88 fps

3dmark03 12500
3dmark05 3490


hth...I know it helps me.

Yours sounds right.



marXbig...who knows just enough to be dangerous.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

<marXbig> skrev i en meddelelse
> Chip: Intel P4E 3.2 Prescott @ 3.52 MHz. 1 MB L-2 cache (core voltage
> @ 1.392, stock hs and fan).
> FSB: @ 4 x 220 = 880MHz
> Mobo: Asus P4C800-E Deluxe
> PS: Enermax 450 w
> RAM: 2x Corsair CMX512-4000 Extreme DDR SDRAM PC4000 (250 MHz)
> Video Card: Albatron GeForce 6800GT 256 DDR3 350/1.0 (no OC)
> Settings: Application Controlled
> Vid Drivers: 61.77
> DirectX Version 9.0c
> Fastwrites: Enabled
> Side-band Addressing: Enabled
> AGP Aperture: 128 MB
> HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5 Raid Array
> HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
> HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
> HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
> Sound Card: Creative Audigy2 ZS w/ Creative 5300 5.1 speakers
> OS: Win XP-1
> Case: Luan Li alum/435 ATXmed (black)
> Monitor: Sony PREMIERPRO 23" Wide Screen Flat Panel LCD SDM-234/B @
> "1920x1200x72Hz" DVI-D (Primary)
> Monitor: NEC MultiSync LCD 1850E @ "1280x1024 @ 72Hz" Analog
> (Secondary)
> Mouse: Logitech MX-Laser 1000 w/ func gaming pad
>
> Results:
>
> 1600x1200 High no aa 52 fps
> 1024x768 High no aa 72 fps
> 800x600 High no aa 88 fps
>
> 3dmark03 12500
> 3dmark05 3490
>
>
> hth...I know it helps me.
>
> Yours sounds right.

Yours doesn´t. U might wanna re-run the 05´ test.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 07:23:17 +0100, "N´far" <rudiFJERNkols@mail.dk>
wrote:

>
><marXbig> skrev i en meddelelse
>> Chip: Intel P4E 3.2 Prescott @ 3.52 MHz. 1 MB L-2 cache (core voltage
>> @ 1.392, stock hs and fan).
>> FSB: @ 4 x 220 = 880MHz
>> Mobo: Asus P4C800-E Deluxe
>> PS: Enermax 450 w
>> RAM: 2x Corsair CMX512-4000 Extreme DDR SDRAM PC4000 (250 MHz)
>> Video Card: Albatron GeForce 6800GT 256 DDR3 350/1.0 (no OC)
>> Settings: Application Controlled
>> Vid Drivers: 61.77
>> DirectX Version 9.0c
>> Fastwrites: Enabled
>> Side-band Addressing: Enabled
>> AGP Aperture: 128 MB
>> HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5 Raid Array
>> HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
>> HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
>> HDD: Maxtor 80 gig 7200 rpm DMA 5
>> Sound Card: Creative Audigy2 ZS w/ Creative 5300 5.1 speakers
>> OS: Win XP-1
>> Case: Luan Li alum/435 ATXmed (black)
>> Monitor: Sony PREMIERPRO 23" Wide Screen Flat Panel LCD SDM-234/B @
>> "1920x1200x72Hz" DVI-D (Primary)
>> Monitor: NEC MultiSync LCD 1850E @ "1280x1024 @ 72Hz" Analog
>> (Secondary)
>> Mouse: Logitech MX-Laser 1000 w/ func gaming pad
>>
>> Results:
>>
>> 1600x1200 High no aa 52 fps
>> 1024x768 High no aa 72 fps
>> 800x600 High no aa 88 fps
>>
>> 3dmark03 12500
>> 3dmark05 3490
>>
>>
>> hth...I know it helps me.
>>
>> Yours sounds right.
>
>Yours doesn´t. U might wanna re-run the 05´ test.


oops...Ran again. Must have been a typo. Real score should have been
5490. Not the best on there but within 300-400 of comparable rigs with
the biggest difference being the oc'ing of the fsb for the cpu test.
Most of the higher scores are oc'ed to 236+/- on abit or max boards.

thx for catching that.


>

marXbig...who knows just enough to be dangerous.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 10:43:20 -0500, marXbig wrote:


>>
>>Yours doesn´t. U might wanna re-run the 05´ test.
>
>
>oops...Ran again. Must have been a typo. Real score should have been
>5490. Not the best on there but within 300-400 of comparable rigs with
>the biggest difference being the oc'ing of the fsb for the cpu test.
>Most of the higher scores are oc'ed to 236+/- on abit or max boards.
>
>thx for catching that.



Also cleaned up the programs running in systray, defragged the ram and
ran the timedemo in d3 again.

16x12: 67fps
1024x768: 78fps

Guess I was just sloppy running my tests.


marXbig...who knows just enough to be dangerous.

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On 11/6/2004 7:57 AM marXbig brightened our day with:

>On Sat, 06 Nov 2004 10:43:20 -0500, marXbig wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>>Yours doesn´t. U might wanna re-run the 05´ test.
>>>
>>>
>>oops...Ran again. Must have been a typo. Real score should have been
>>5490. Not the best on there but within 300-400 of comparable rigs with
>>the biggest difference being the oc'ing of the fsb for the cpu test.
>>Most of the higher scores are oc'ed to 236+/- on abit or max boards.
>>
>>thx for catching that.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>Also cleaned up the programs running in systray, defragged the ram and
>ran the timedemo in d3 again.
>
>16x12: 67fps
>1024x768: 78fps
>
>Guess I was just sloppy running my tests.
>
>
>
One of the benefits of having all that horsepower is you can be sloppy.
I am so in the habit of painstakingly shutting down programs and
background processes when preparing a gaming session, while my current
system enables me to be a bit more lax on that, I still do it.

Defragging your RAM, I've heard of that, but what I've heard is that it
really doesn't do much.

Question, how's Lucas doing? Has he got so successful that he could
loan you all the dough for those recent upgrades?
From his Bio at pgatour.com, it looks pretty good, you must be even
more proud.

--
Steve ¤»Inglo«¤
www.inglostadt.com