randomizer :
Oblivion: Buggy to this day. Really odd physics too.
Fallout (I assume you mean fallout 3 since you're mostly talking about semi-recent games here): Incredibly buggy, which is not surprising since it is also a Bethesda botch-up. It also needs texture replacement mods to really look any good. The atmosphere was done well for an old engine but the textures are horrible.
BC2: looks ok but it's little more than another generic shooter (something I've come to expect from that genre).
Eve online: Never played it so I can't comment on that.
I'm kind of surprised you didn't mention Crysis, but I suppose it doesn't excel enough in the gameplay area to count.
lol, I love how all 3 of you completely over looked the main point and immediately hated on my choice of decent games. I agree with all of your criticisms of these games, but thats not going to make WoW look any better. You folks argument revolves around the fact that gameplay is greater than graphics. That idea was never contested, but I would argue that visuals are a really important part of gameplay, which can't be separated out to say so simply gameplay>graphics. A good modern game needs both. Something like Just Cause 2, or to stay in the mmo department....eve online I guess.
I actually never had a crashing issue with oblivion but fallout 3 was a complete joke. I routinely hate on fallout 3 as well and feel free to give it a search...its just a terrible game really, but most people love it. YA shoot ogres in slow motion that look like they belong in warcraft...somehow these huge things are everywhere and the slow motion camera aims for you making for a really unexciting romp around the terrible looking game environment...not to mention the bugs.
bfbc2 is a sad excuse for what should have been battlefield 3, but whatever its still the most fun fps out right now.
Their are so many reasons WoW clones failed to stick around. Lets look at them individually.
Age of Conan-never tried it so I cant say...do you all have to be conan? that would be a drag..lol
Aion- Really fun to fly around for a bit until you realize the game is 1/2 done and you hear that sorcerer make the same spell creation grunt 5000 times and its annoying as hell. graphics are slllliightly better than WoW and gameplay is exactly the same or worse. BUT U CAN HAZ A FLY!....fail
Warhammer-the whole theme behind warhammer just seems rediculous to me...mixing up marines and ogres, catapults and siege tanks, but whatever. Hardcore rpg fans probably love it.
I wasnt around when WoW was initially released, but I don't recall it having any competition except everquest or that other game exactly like it. Those were obviously a joke next to WoW and since then WoW has been able to build a healthy customer base of addicts. Recent wow clones as described, like most mmos, released instantaneously as if it twas a greasy turd unfit for further development.
i said it twice, and now ill say it a 3rd time...and put it in italics to highlight its importantness.
Graphics can b e scalable so as not to exclude anyone from the player base. To get the point through, lets just imagine a little example of what that might be like. Imagine one guy playing the game as it appears now on his moms 8 year old computer in the basement....hes absolutely loving it just like all you fellows. Now you got me, who has this supercomputer and wants to see some fancier models and FX, so I crank it up. By crank it up I mean turn the graphics up to a higher setting thus resulting in a more stimulating visual experience. Both parties are loving the game, blizzard looses no customers...its win win win...win
Additionally I have also mentioned once or twice that I don't completely HATE WoW. I mentioned playing and enjoying it to an extent up until lvl 20. I am merely unsatisfied with the graphics and surprised that 10 million others don't mind that much about level of detail. Every game has its flaws and this one is in the visual department...admit it.