Hi, i want to buy the Asus P5WD2 Premium and some things are just confusing for me. for exmaple, the processor i'm going to install on it is intel 3.4ghz 800fsb and i want to get a ddr800 memory, now the question is that a good choice? i'm thinking since the memory is operating at 800 mhz and the fsb 800 that this is not a good match, but i'm not a computer expert? Also could someone simply explain Silicon Image 3132 SATA controller, I see this in the specs for the asus motherboard but don't quit get what it is i good for exactly? Thank you for reading this.
I need to know what your using the system for. I have this Mobo and use Corsair 8000UL which is rated to run up to 1000Mhz. It will run 800Mhz at very low timings so if your going to buy enthusiast level RAM either get the same RAM I have or Mushkins new DDR2 6400.
The SATA controller allows you to run RAID configs with SATA Hard drives.
ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz
Be sure to check out the name under the #1 spot on this page <A HREF="http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=2564&s=27" target="_new">http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=2564&s=27</A>
Im confused because everything that I have read and even Corsair had told me at one time that the 8000UL was the best. Im going to research this.
ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz
Something stange is going on with this. I just went to the CPUz hall of fame and checked his details. It shows the ram as being 5300 which is the 8000UL. Im going to E-mail him.
ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz
well i'm going to be using it for games, watching videos ect... But what i was trying to say is that since my processor is running at 800 fsb and my ram runs at 800 mhz than wouldn't this trouble the processor, where else if i had a processor that ran at 1066 fsb and same ram, than it would be of a less of a problem. Unless i'm wrong, than again, i'm kinda new to this.
Ram like DDR and DDR2 use Double data rate to send twice the information every clock cycle.
So DDR2 800 is actually running at 400 mhz.
Your P4 use QUad Pumped FSB sending 4X the info every clock cycle. Thus the actual clock speed is 200 mhz FSB.
Now since these board use DUAL channel, they have 2X DDR400 channel, some marketing people called it FSB800 when its actual runnin 2(# of channel) X 200mhz X 2 (2X the data...).
So Running DDR2- 800 in dual channel will give you 2X the bandwithc of your cpu...
Hi, i understood everything in your reply but i got lost when you said this:
"Now since these board use DUAL channel, they have 2X DDR400 channel, some marketing people called it FSB800 when its actual runnin 2(# of channel) X 200mhz X 2 (2X the data...).
So Running DDR2- 800 in dual channel will give you 2X the bandwithc of your cpu..."
when you say 2x ddr400 channel, meaning that memory is running at ddr 800?
If i understand correctly fsb means how fast is the motherboard communicating with the hardware, right?
now this i very lost at this statment "actual runnin 2(# of channel) X 200mhz X 2 (2X the data...)"?
sorry to bother you with all these questions, thank you all for replying to my thread.
And yes your are right about the FSB but its the speed at wich the memory is "talking" to the CPU.
DUal channel is a way two use two seperate channel to double the bandwith between the Cpu and the Memory, on intel its actualyl between the northbridge and the Memory...
So you take DDR-400 aka PC3200, you get a dual channel motherboard and you have 6.4 gig/sec of bandwith because you effectivly double it buy running 2 seperate lane.
Think of it as a highway, twice as many can go at the same time. In the end you have the same ammount of car passing buy as if you had one lane with cars going twice as fast.
Now some people decided to market that Dual Channel as FSB-800 when actually its only 2 channel running at 400 MHZ.
AND that 400mhz is actually only 200mhz but using DDR technology, you send twice the amount of data every clock cycle,(same highway analogy here).
Now the maximum FSB current Intel board will officialy support is FSB 1066, wich is DUal channel FSB533.
Fianlly, your memory is working at 800 mhz, wich is a good 266mhz faster than the fastest motherboard, thus this memory is only usefull if your overclocking your motherbaord's frontSideBus(and your cpu at the same time) or if you use dividers to make the memory run Asynchronously from the rest of the system.
Now some people decided to market that Dual Channel as FSB-800 when actually its only 2 channel running at 400 MHZ.
Ummm, I think you've got this partially wrong - right in the idea, wrong in some details.
Intel uses what is called "Quad-pumped" FSB which is where data is transferred 4 times per clock tick. So, that 800FSB is really 200mhz, with data transferred 4 times per tick. (1066fsb is 266mhz x 4)
Memory, DDR400, DDR533, etc. (DDR or DDR2 doesn't matter, its the same at this level) is Double Data Rate. So you get a 200mhz clock and 2 transfers per tick for DDR400. (DDR533 = 266mhz x 2 tx/tick)
Dual channel doesn't change the speed (in mhz), but it does make the path wider (like a highway - good analogy )
FSB and Memory speed are actually 2 different things. FSB is the bus between the CPU and the northbridge, memory speed is the speed the memory runs at and can be different (hence the dividers, and other settings for memory:fsb). Its generally considered best for FSB and memory to run at the same speed, so its common to have it considered the same.
Intel's 200mhz QDR FSB (effective 800mhz) is a perfect fit bandwidth-wise for dual-channel DDR400 RAM (or DDR2). The 1066 FSB is the same - a perfect fit for DDR533 RAM in dual channel.
DDR800 RAM is currently overkill for any but high-end overclockers (but you said that already). If your mobo supports a DDR800 memory speed setting, you could probably run it single channel and get similar performance to dual-channel DDR400 memory. I don't know of any that do however.
Mike.
<font color=blue>Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside the dog its too dark to read.
-- Groucho Marx</font color=blue>
Thanks! I almost set the new WR but Sham ran the test about 5 mins before I did. He has a V-mod done for the RAM voltage. Im going to mod mine in the next couple of days.
ASUS P5WD2 Premium
Intel 3.73 EE @ 5.6Ghz
XMS2 DDR2 @ 1180Mhz
Okay, so according to what you saying, than it is safe to run a single ddr2 800(pc2-6400) on the Asus P5WD2 Premium, even when you motherboard runs at 800 fsb. Also the dual channel with ddr2 800(pc2-6400) should work, right? what do you think( and everyone else )? thank you.
hi, so with dual channel, the memory is still at the same speed, 800 mhz, but now i'm sending more information, instead of 6400 it will be sending 12800? And the processor that is 3.4 ghz, fsb 800 mhz, 1mb cache will be able to take advantage of that bandwidth and speed, correct?? thank you.
okay, could you tell me what i'm getting wrong, or do you know of an article that could clear this thing up for me? i tried in tomshardware.com, but nothing in there that seems to answer my question? the internet on the other hand is a large place to look for little detials like i'm requests hehe thank you.
The CPU has a 64-bit wide bus. The memory has a 64-bit wide bus. Dual Channel makes two modules parallel, for a 128-bit wide bus, doubling the data transfers.
The P4 with 800 bus runs at 200MHz at Quadruple Data Rate, similar to how AGP4x runs at 4x. DDR SDRAM at 200MHz clock speed runs DDR400.
DDR400 in dual channel mode would be a perfect match for a P4 with 800 bus, because 400x2=800.
The math is actually a bit more complicated, for the CPU it's clock x data rate x 64 bits, or 200x4x64=512000 megabits per second, divide that by 8 to get 64000 megabytes per second, or 6.4GB/s. But for the RAM, dual channel gives you 128-bits rather than 64, so it's clock x data rate x 64 bits, or 200x2x128=512000Mb/s=6400MB/s=6.4GB/s. So DDR400 in dual-channel mode has the same transfer rate as a P4 with 800 bus.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
Oh okay, it seems clear now. so according to you, if i were to use let say ddr800 and i were to use it in dual channel, than my fsb from 800 must increase to about 1600, meaning overclocking must be done? and i think when you increase fsb your cpu speed increase as well, i think. so basically for a non overclocker, who has a cpu that runs at 800 fbs, he must use ddr400 in dual channel and if he were to use the ddr533 than he would need the new processors that run at 1066 fsb? correct? thank you all for the help and support.
You can run the memory bus at a higher data rate than the CPU bus, but without any performance advantages.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
You can run the DDR2-800, but what speed will your motherboard run it at? Its capable of running at 400mhz, but I don't know of any mobos that will run the memory at that speed. More likely it will run at 266 (the mhz used to get the 1066fsb). Think of memory speed as its max. speed - and the mobo sets the speed limit.
So, your single DDR2-800 RAM will not run at 800, it'll be limited by the mobo to 533 (266mhz), so you'll need 2 of them, and run them at 200mhz to be in synch with your CPU.
Mike.
<font color=blue>Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside the dog its too dark to read.
-- Groucho Marx</font color=blue>
well the ASUS P5WD2 Premium i believe it says that it supports ddr2 800. But i think if i'm going to buy a memory it would be two ddr2 400 running in dual channel because it is much cheaper than ddr2 800. Also if i were to buy ddr2 533, i think the motherboard would be able to downgrade it to ddr2 400 so that it can match fsb 800 and than if i were to upgrade to process that runs at fsb 1066 i could just increase speed to 533 to it's adveristed speed. i think i read this in tomshardware in one of the articles, unless i'm wrong.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.