Download the Tom's Hardware App from the App Store
The reference for current tech news
Yes No
Ads
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Video Games > General Discussion > Do you chose a game based on graphics? or gameplay?

Do you chose a game based on graphics? or gameplay?

Forum Video Games : General Discussion Do you chose a game based on graphics? or gameplay?

Word :    Username :           
 

Hi, how do you choose your game ? what's most important to you? is it the gameplay? or the high graphics?
personally i prefer high graphics

so what do you think?

Reply to splinter09
Register or log in to remove.

Gameplay

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx

Graphics contribute to gameplay, but don't determine it.

Reply to Blue a10

mostly gameplay look at some of the best games ever ....
pac man
doom
castle wolfenstein 1
ultima underworld
dune
red aleart
etc none had even good graphics
now look at that new game Final Fantasy XIV great graphics but its getting very bad reviews 4/10 from gamespot etc
so are you sure its graphics :)
its hard to find games with both but maybe ....
bioshock 1, and 2 when its out
oblivion with mods
the witcher and 2 when its out
crysis


Message edited by sirkillalot on 10-10-2010 at 12:18:31 PM
------------------------------ AMD p2x6 1100t 3.3ghz ATI 5870 DX11 [:boudy:2]
24" dell 1900x1200 2x74 wraptor hd's1 X-FI pro gamer sounds
4G ram log.Z5500 speakers 750w toughpower G15kb dvd.
Reply to sirkillalot
- 0 +

Gameplay. If i'm interested in the graphics of a game, but not the gameplay, I'll get a demo if available.

Reply to mi1ez

I like games with a balance between the two, but gameplay will always be superior. Two games that have a great balance are fable 2 and Crysis

Reply to SupahDonkeh

Gameplay

------------------------------ Greensmith: Intel Q6600 @2,4Ghz Kentsfield G0;GByte GA-P35-S3L; 4 GB DDR2 A-Data Plus 800Mhz 4-4-4-11@1.8V; Sparkle GTX560Ti 1GB 256bit DDR5; Seagate 160GB + WDC Green 1 TB 64MB; Acbel Gold 500W gaming;ECS 430W Casing System; 18"LED.
Reply to andrern2000

Gameplay above graphics, which is why I still play most of my golden oldies. I like to tinker though, so I will spend a lot of time tweaking a game to give me the best visual experience.

Reply to Herr_Koos

I like games, not interactive tech demos. Half Life 2 series will keep me coming back over and over because of the story. Played Crysis once and however pretty it may be it has no long-term appeal.

Gameplay every time.

Reply to LePhuronn
- 0 +

For me the answer would be both...

For example I still love the original Elite, which in its day was both ground breaking graphics and gameplay.

I played other games just because they were fun, before we really started judging games by their graphics quality at all :D

On a gameplay example, I eventually bought Knights of the old republic years after its release purely for the rumoured storyline and gameplay. The graphics were outdated by then but gameplay alone was enough for me to give it a go.

On the graphics side I bought Oblivion and Crysis as soon as they came out - sold by the graphics, seeing the cutting edge of what PC's could do. As luck would have it Oblivion has kept me coming back due to gameplay. Crysis as well but to a lesser degree, people slate crysis but I didnt find the game play of puttingly bad at all.

There are a very few games that stand out in my mind as being graphically innovative and having detrimentally bad game play. Rise of the Robots was a game with huge graphical hype that might have sold better had they never released a playable demo. If there hadnt been a Demo I would have certainly bought it based on the graphics and expected at least passable playability (and been bitterly dissapointed)

I will buy a game either for special technical merit on the graphics side or for exceptional gameplay, but if it has both its likelly to be a long term game for me (like Elite, star wars galaxies and oblivion at release)

------------------------------ ---------------
E8400, HD4870, 8gb Corsair 6400 XMS2 DHX CL4(4-4-4-12) Gigabyte GA-X38-DS4, OCZ 64GB SSD, Antec P180, Antec Neo HE500
Reply to dtq

I would say both, but what attracts me to the game first is the graphics then I look into the gameplay, if I like it then its a sure buy but if I dont then no way in hell

Reply to smile9999
- 0 +

I am a graphics junkie, which has led me to a few bad purchases in my time, but yes, graphics are the biggest draw.

Older games are in a place of their own, so graphics matter not, but all modern games that have better gameplay than graphics I tend to avoid simply because i like the Visuals too much!

------------------------------ http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1289711
Reply to moricon

Gameplay > Art Work > Graphics

However, Graphics and the arts within the game is worth many points in my book. Take a look at Bioshock, graphics were average but the art work was one of the best I've seen in modern gaming.

Reply to Alex The PC Gamer
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Video Games > General Discussion > Do you chose a game based on graphics? or gameplay?
Go to:

There are 2167 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Ads
Latest best answer
Gamer Recommendations for Earbuds/IEMs?
By AntiZig, 2 days ago:

Hi, one thing I'm sortof confused about if you already have the headphones that you like...

Best offers
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them
Top experts