Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (
More info?)
I agree with that. I have Cingular for work which uses GSM and the sound
quality is superb. There is background noise....as with any cellular service
but soon as you start talking or the other party, that all goes away with
crystal clear voice. Verizon, on the other hand does not do this. I get
loads of garble and packet loss because of the compression problems. Every
few minutes or so I'll get a very weird blurp, which lasts about a second
and when having a conversation with some one some one has to repeat what was
said of course. Hey, I'm back on Verizon now but always can be thrown back
on with Cingular again if things don't EVER get better. For those of you who
never tried a GSM phone or used one on a network, please try if you can.
You'll notice the difference pretty quickly.
"Sneaker Freak" <sneakerfreak@covad.net> wrote in message
news:BD668B48.3EB1%sneakerfreak@covad.net...
> On 9/8/04 11:08 PM, in article
> 9e812e3c.0409081908.4494df35@posting.google.com, "John"
> <jax@presidency.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am really a bit stunned, I have had reason to use a GSM phone for
>> the last week (Blackberry 7280 on ATT in metro DC) and the voice
>> quality is just superb. I really thought I would be with Verizon for
>> the long hall and now have to think about it. The VZ coverage is
>> better - but is it that much better? I'm still not sure. Being able
>> to hear the other party so clearly has its up sides also!
>> I am also not sure about the effect of the Cingular/ATT merger. It
>> still clearly prefers the ATT network even when there may be some
>> better Cingular signal - this will probably change soon and
>> Cingular+ATT will get better coverage (or perhaps I am just listening
>> to sales hype).
>> My VZ phone is an LG4400, one of the better ones. Has anyone else
>> noted this voice quality issue? Could there be any other factors?
>
> Yes - I've been with Verizon for 3 years, with a LG TM-510 and a T720.
> Both
> have had Excellent voice quality within my area. Also, where I work, we
> use
> Verizon for cellphones and it's not uncommon to use them extensively all
> the
> time. They are mixes of Kyocera, Motorola, and Audiovox. In a quiet
> room,
> all sound very good. However once the background noise or compression on
> the cell increases, they all sound absolutely horrible. Most of the time,
> they actually hurt my ears. Warbly coarse sound and it just overall
> sounds
> horrible. The best are those with flips, Motorolas and LG.
>
> However, I've been experiencing seriously declining service on both my
> work
> cell phone and my personal phone (also was with VZ), so I started looking
> at
> alternatives. Having tried GSM back in the Omnipoint days (and had decent
> coverage) I was fine going back.
>
> Picked up a T637 and signed 1 year with ATTWS (will convert to Cingular
> once
> the merger goes through) as I was with them previously and had great
> service. Well, let me tell you, the quality is a lot better. You do hear
> more background noise with GSM, but your voice comes through loud and
> clear.
> And it sounds very natural. No warbly coarse sound, just your normal
> voice.
> A much better sounding system than CDMA, IMHO.
>
> And ATTWS's coverage has been every bit as good as (actually better than)
> Verizon's here in S. Central PA.
>