1.3 Patch is out

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

Inglo wasted my time on 5/24/2005 10:50 PM with the following:
> http://www.3dgamers.com/dlselect/games/doom3/d3_1_3.exe.html
>

id has their own bittorrent tracker, the link is on iddevnet:

http://www.iddevnet.com/doom3/


The new netcode is much improved, or as far as I can tell it is.

A cool new feature is the lag graph, similar to Q3

Punkbuster support is now included in D3.

Screw it, read the readme for yourself.

--
-SnoopJeDi
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

Quoth The Raven "don"<bogus@nunsuch.net> in
Xns9660EBD904B7Abogusnunsuchnet@130.81.64.196
> Inglo <ioo@??.¿¿¿> wrote in news:EJRke.21015$J12.14722
> @newssvr14.news.prodigy.com:
>
>> http://www.3dgamers.com/dlselect/games/doom3/d3_1_3.exe.html
>>
>
> interesting. yesterday when I looked the only patch was 1.1? damn id
> patches fast!


http://download.activision.com/doom3/D3_1_3.exe
--
Only pedantic people use the word pedantic, and only a truly pedantic
person would use the term pedantic four times in a statement.

Take out the _CURSEING to reply to me
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

don wrote:
> interesting. yesterday when I looked the only patch was 1.1? damn id
> patches fast!

Commercial patch v1.2 was D3 extension: Resurrection of Evil. ;-) Thats
the reason for version number 1.3.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

SnoopJeDi wrote:
> Inglo wasted my time on 5/24/2005 10:50 PM with the following:
>
>> http://www.3dgamers.com/dlselect/games/doom3/d3_1_3.exe.html
>>
>
> id has their own bittorrent tracker, the link is on iddevnet:
>
> http://www.iddevnet.com/doom3/
>
>
> The new netcode is much improved, or as far as I can tell it is.
>
> A cool new feature is the lag graph, similar to Q3
>
> Punkbuster support is now included in D3.

what is punkbuster? i never heard of it until now. searching the
internet in the mean time.
>
> Screw it, read the readme for yourself.
>
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:59:45 +0000, Inglo wrote:

> Dude, you've been an annoying little cramped sphincter in every group
> I've ever seen you post in. I'm going to have to agree with bob.

You really think so? Let me get this straight... You think it's
perfectly acceptable for someone to post the question "What is
Punkbuster?", and then NINE MINUTES later post saying "Nevermind, I found
it"?. Is that what you're saying? You don't think he should have done a
little looking around first? Come on.

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

Dan C wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:59:45 +0000, Inglo wrote:
>
>
>>Dude, you've been an annoying little cramped sphincter in every group
>>I've ever seen you post in. I'm going to have to agree with bob.

thats why i said what i said.

i quickly looked in this group yesterday and dan seems to do nothing but
attack people.

>
>
> You really think so? Let me get this straight... You think it's
> perfectly acceptable for someone to post the question "What is
> Punkbuster?", and then NINE MINUTES later post saying "Nevermind, I found
> it"?. Is that what you're saying? You don't think he should have done a
> little looking around first? Come on.

dan,

now that you "attacked" me three or four times in your replies and you
seem to know it all, i'll play really dumb and forget that i went and
found what punkbuster is/was.

why dont you explain to me in your own words what pucnkbuster is and
answer my original post and leave the personal stuff out of it.

if you not going to answer the question, dont bother replying.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

bob brozewicz wrote:

> found what punkbuster is/was.

(nice fight you have there)

Yup, but I waste 2 hour of my time to set this Punkbuster up.
Informations how to set it up was very poor, like iD games history all
the time. Now I am talking dedicated servers setup. It was very hard to
set up Doom III running with .bat and server config file. Now this
Punkbuster.

Now I know and can tell Punkbuster is not on/enabled on default. It is
off. Now I can tell there are any .cfg file to edit with Notepad. There
is only \PB folder on your \Doom 3 folder.

First you have to enable Punkbuster. Easiest way to check up if
Punkbuster is on/running you type 'pb_sv_ver' command in server console
(remote control to your server screen: vpn or Microsoft own remote
software) or take remote control to your server (rcon password), and
this tell what version your Punkbuster is. If console tell unknown
command it means Punkbuster is not running.

Type 'pb_sv_enable' to turn it running. Type 'pb_sv-writecfg' to write
..cfg file. Then go to Punkbuster home page and start learning how to set
up those mystical lines. In remote support you have to tell http port
where you come and remote control Punkbuster WebTool. On help they say
ex. 8000. But they didn't tell that when logging in you may not press
enter when entering your remote passward. You had to let password in its
place and press then the button whats action you wanna use.

O'boy this all was so "left handed". How I said - I waste 2 hours for
this!

But more is coming. I do not know how to update Punkbuster
automatically. My pbweb.exe do not connect to server. It write only 404
error (server not found). Maybe it is that 'pb_homepath' do not show
nothing information on console?


**ERROR from Web Server: 404 Not Found

Attempting to download htm\mc001086.htm (please wait)

**ERROR from Web Server: 404 Not Found

Press a key to exit
 
B

Baked

Distinguished
Apr 4, 2004
59
0
18,630
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On Fri, 27 May 2005 06:17:29 -0500, Dan C <youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> wrote:

>
>You really think so? Let me get this straight... You think it's
>perfectly acceptable for someone to post the question "What is
>Punkbuster?", and then NINE MINUTES later post saying "Nevermind, I found
>it"?. Is that what you're saying? You don't think he should have done a
>little looking around first? Come on.

Why not? That's what usenet is for, exchanging information. Because it insulted
your simple mind doesn't make it a bad question.
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On Fri, 27 May 2005 17:58:16 -0400, Baked wrote:

> Why not? That's what usenet is for, exchanging information. Because it
> insulted your simple mind doesn't make it a bad question.

If I had a simple mind, it wouldn't have insulted me, would it? I
wouldn't have known enough to be insulted (if I had a simple mind).

You're as ignorant as the OP if you don't see the point. Run along, boy.

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On Mon, 30 May 2005 20:55:31 +0000, McGrandpa wrote:

>> Wrong. You're the ass. You posted your stupid question, and
>> then...... NINE MINUTES later you post that you found the answer.
>> Next time spend that time looking FIRST, dummy.

> SO, you dirty up the ng with all that negativism instead of a single
> positive note? Or did you somehow end up a moderator in an unmoderated

Are you saying I'm wrong? Do you think he should have looked around a
little first before posting such an idiotic question?

Wake up, Gramps.

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

On Mon, 30 May 2005 20:37:29 +0000, McGrandpa wrote:

>>>> You can't. You don't have to play with it on, but there's no reason
>>>> to not use it.

>>> Yes there is.

>> Like?

> I don't want it, it's a snoop :)

How does that make it different from most of the other Windoze software
you're running?

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

McGrandpa wasted my time on 5/30/2005 4:37 PM with the following:
>
>
> I don't want it, it's a snoop :)
> McG.
>

It's *designed* to snoop. Maybe they went overkill as to what is
snooping, but honestly, do you think you maintain anonymity online?

It sounds like you have more of a problem with the idea of PB than with
the software itself.


--
-SnoopJeDi
 
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: alt.games.doom (More info?)

"Dan C" <youmustbejoking@invalid.lan> wrote in message
news:pan.2005.05.30.23.36.29.756408@invalid.lan
> On Mon, 30 May 2005 20:55:31 +0000, McGrandpa wrote:
>
>>> Wrong. You're the ass. You posted your stupid question, and
>>> then...... NINE MINUTES later you post that you found the answer.
>>> Next time spend that time looking FIRST, dummy.
>
>> SO, you dirty up the ng with all that negativism instead of a single
>> positive note? Or did you somehow end up a moderator in an
>> unmoderated
>
> Are you saying I'm wrong? Do you think he should have looked around a
> little first before posting such an idiotic question?
>
> Wake up, Gramps.

I'm saying it was not so big a deal as to make a big fuss over.
McG.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom