I'm still trying to figure out why the newbies are so hot on the CUSL2-C.
We are an authorized Asus dealer and we are real picky (okay, Anal) about selecting motherboards for production use. (Hence our name, "Stable Technologies")
We've done testing on 3 different versions of the CUSL2-C. Using a mixed bag of devices, we haven't had much luck at all with the new -EP chipset version of this board. The -E version actually runs slower than the CUSL2 with the same chipset.
The CUSL2 is much more stable in every variation. Additionally, our specs are saying the CUSL2 runs faster in every variation. Why? I must assume BIOS revisions for the -C just aren't mature yet. This board has only been shipping for a few weeks so I must also assume it will get better, but why would anyone want to take chances when buying a motherboard?
The big advantage everyone seems to be reciting is that it is on average $30.00 cheaper than the CUSL2. This might also explain why my engineers call this board the CUSL2-CHEAP.
I must therefor ask, is it really worth it to save $30.00 on the initial purchase if you are going to have an unstable system, or to have a system that runs slower than it's more mature counterpart? Or, is it worth $30.00 to lose all of the things you gain with the CUSL2? (The USB hub and 2 more ports, the second serial port, AGP4xPro, etc.. as well as the, "you actually have to open the box to see what chipset you got" scenario? I don't think so!
So far everyone seems to be hailing the virtues of this board, but out of all of the comments here only 1 person actually owned one. And he didn't even have the EP chipset, nor had he tested the board with an AGP4xPro device, SCSI cards, WOL services, or DVD so how can he actually give an unbiased rating?
I really think folks should carefully consider the implications of jumping on the -C merry-go-round and talk to some engineers that have actually run this board with a variety of hardware before making a decision. If you have only a single support issue, I think you would agree that the $30.00 difference in price would have been money well spent on the more mature and stable CUSL2.
Steve Benoit
Stable Technologies
'The way IT should be!'<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by stable on 02/15/01 06:33 PM.</EM></FONT></P>