Oldmangamer_73 :
I'm saying a huge corporation like Boeing would not make plans for building aircraft based on "fossil fuels" for the next several decades without prior knowledge of how to fuel those aircraft. That fuel will be petroleum for a lot more than ~35 years.
Then what would they base it on? This is a red herring entirely here bud. You can't magically use a fuel that doesn't exist yet, you can only design around the limitations you currently have an hope for the best. They need super high energy outputs, and the only way outside of oil based fuel is nuclear.
Oldmangamer_73 :
I'm still not convinced that converting one's food supply to fuel is such a wise move. We haven't solved the problem of transporting ethanol either.
Another common misconception of ethanol is that it will come entirely from corn, which is propaganda. Right now we have biological organisms that can break down car tires and in turn generate economical amounts of ethanol. This has been around for a few years now and I remember first reading about it in an Engineering magazine probably 4 years ago.
Found the company who's doing it:
Coskata
Not to mention that the real buzz isn't ethanol or natural gas, it's hydrogen. But everyone is afraid of fuel cells catching fire and blowing up a city block with a single car fire - I think we are smarter than that, but I think it's the fact that hydrogen is so readily abundant (h2o) that there will be to many companies who will be able to commoditize it and there won't be an oligopoly over the market like there is no with crude.
Oldmangamer_73 :
I've read if the fracking frack is done in a responsible manner, it will have very little impact on the water table.
Yeah, everything still points to corporate irresponsibility on that front. I'm going to continue waving my anti-American company flags if they continue to pursue profit while pillaging our countrysides.
Ars Technica: How the EPA linked "fracking" to contaminated well water 12-09-11 - This article was just published...
Reynod :
We discussed fraking before and with good gobt oversight and controls I am for it.
The lease should extend to cleaning up the site after - govt should levy money from the lease via taz to ensure it is done if the company goes bust in the meantime.
That's a great thought, but it's not happening, yet.