I have a burning question about the P4 boards.
I'm looking to buy a new motherboard for various reasons, and I want this sucker to fly. I'm considering all the issues with motherboards, such as bus speed, memory, and the chip. I was looking over at this motherboard from Asus, one of their only P4 boards:
http://www.asus.com/products/Motherboard/Pentium4/p4t/index.html
I've read the many debates over RDram and DDRam, and the P4 vs Athlon; I just want the best performance with similar prices. I can get the P4 mothebroard and a P4 1.3 for very similar prices to a nice Athlon motherboard and a 1.3 Athlon chip. But to my surprise, the P4 board runs at 400mhz - how are the two even comparable? I know the chips compare differently (Athlon performing better) but why isn't the 233 bus speed now cast aside and stepped on while making one's way to this 400mhz intel chip? Thats like stepping up from a 133 to a 200.
Does the P4 actually run at 400? Do the devices interface at 400, while the Athlon boards interface at 233? If this is the case, then I would gladly go with the P4 board and the RDram, no matter how unpopular. One reason is for the Geforce3, which I believe runs at ~400mhz. Any fast future devices would benefit from such a bus speed. If the Athlon chip runs better, and the ram's are comparble in performance, then wouldn't the 400mhz board be a better investment as all devices now and in the future would run at a higher speed? I can always upgrade the processor or whatever when Intel gets its act together. Also, the ram is running at 800 (RDram) - why would you purchase a DDRram compatible P4 board when they are available if the ram is going to be 233 and the board 400? Would that now lower the board to 233, which I'm sure the P4 would drastically slow down.
What I don't see is why sacrifice so much bus preformance to get an Athlon? Or are the two buses comparable somehow? (I'm just going off the numbers ;-)
Any responses would be appreciated, please don't address DDR vs RDram unless you're talking about how the board somehow, I'm aware of their respective differences =)
Thanks.
-Phil Crosby
http://www.philisoft.com
http://www.graphics-design.com
I'm looking to buy a new motherboard for various reasons, and I want this sucker to fly. I'm considering all the issues with motherboards, such as bus speed, memory, and the chip. I was looking over at this motherboard from Asus, one of their only P4 boards:
http://www.asus.com/products/Motherboard/Pentium4/p4t/index.html
I've read the many debates over RDram and DDRam, and the P4 vs Athlon; I just want the best performance with similar prices. I can get the P4 mothebroard and a P4 1.3 for very similar prices to a nice Athlon motherboard and a 1.3 Athlon chip. But to my surprise, the P4 board runs at 400mhz - how are the two even comparable? I know the chips compare differently (Athlon performing better) but why isn't the 233 bus speed now cast aside and stepped on while making one's way to this 400mhz intel chip? Thats like stepping up from a 133 to a 200.
Does the P4 actually run at 400? Do the devices interface at 400, while the Athlon boards interface at 233? If this is the case, then I would gladly go with the P4 board and the RDram, no matter how unpopular. One reason is for the Geforce3, which I believe runs at ~400mhz. Any fast future devices would benefit from such a bus speed. If the Athlon chip runs better, and the ram's are comparble in performance, then wouldn't the 400mhz board be a better investment as all devices now and in the future would run at a higher speed? I can always upgrade the processor or whatever when Intel gets its act together. Also, the ram is running at 800 (RDram) - why would you purchase a DDRram compatible P4 board when they are available if the ram is going to be 233 and the board 400? Would that now lower the board to 233, which I'm sure the P4 would drastically slow down.
What I don't see is why sacrifice so much bus preformance to get an Athlon? Or are the two buses comparable somehow? (I'm just going off the numbers ;-)
Any responses would be appreciated, please don't address DDR vs RDram unless you're talking about how the board somehow, I'm aware of their respective differences =)
Thanks.
-Phil Crosby
http://www.philisoft.com
http://www.graphics-design.com