Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?
Julie Ruin wrote:
> The camera is bad, and GPS is only for when you dial 911 it's not for
> location based services or anything usefull. Unless you're a die-hard
> Motorola fan go with the Audiovox.
> "Scott Ehrlich" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
>>I qualify for NE2 and am debating between the v265 and Audiovox
>> 8910/9900. The attractions for me to the v265 are the GPS capability
>> and the camera. I've read at least one post saying the camera doesn't
>> work so well. How about the GPS location feature? How does that
>> actually work? Does it require a data subscription? Is it fast? I'm a
>> big Mot fan and would like to stay with it. I also have the 270c and
>> 2868 accessories, so presuming the v265 maintains at least the 270c
>> line (charging connectors) I'll be ok.
>> If neither the GPS nor camera are that great, I'll likely go with the
>> Audiovox and test it, as I've heard its camera is decent.
>> Any idea when the v265 will hit the Boston MA area?
Agreed. I absolutely HATE Audiovox phones, but the 8910 is a Cadillac
compared to the v265. Better display, better camera, equally-cheap