Will I be able to run BF3 maxed out?
Tags:
Last response: in Video Games
Will I be able to run BF3 maxed out in DX11? I imagine if anything will let me down it'll be the GPU?
AMD Phenom ii x 4 970 BE @ 3.9Ghz
4gb DDR3 1600Mhz
Radeon HD 5850 1gb
AMD Phenom ii x 4 970 BE @ 3.9Ghz
4gb DDR3 1600Mhz
Radeon HD 5850 1gb
More about : run bf3 maxed
Related ressources
- Cheapest build to run bf3 maxed out - Forum
- Able to MAX out BF3 , Skyrim, and Arma 2? - Forum
- Will a MSI N580GTX lightning Xtreme edition be able to run bf3 max - Forum
- BF3 maxed out ?? - Forum
- Could this Spec run Far Cry 3 and Battlefield 3 maxed out on 1280x1024 - Forum
Ambam what do you ******* think.
As for Ryan you should be able to play with most settings maxed but maybe turn down a couple things such as shadows and AA, maybe even a texture or so but it won't matter it will still look great. We won't know for sure though until it's out so just save up a little bit of money and when it comes out if you can't max it out then if you did save up some money go buy another 5850 and run them in crossfire and then you should be future proof for a while. But if your MB cant run crossfire than just turn down the settings a little bit. The game will still look great so don't get to depressed.
As for Ryan you should be able to play with most settings maxed but maybe turn down a couple things such as shadows and AA, maybe even a texture or so but it won't matter it will still look great. We won't know for sure though until it's out so just save up a little bit of money and when it comes out if you can't max it out then if you did save up some money go buy another 5850 and run them in crossfire and then you should be future proof for a while. But if your MB cant run crossfire than just turn down the settings a little bit. The game will still look great so don't get to depressed.
ambam said:
Will my rig be able to max it out?Core i7 930
6GB DDR3 RAM
Two Radeon HD 5870's (1GB) in crossfireX
1920x1080 monitor.
if this is a serious question then you really need to go back to school or something. if its not a serious question then i hope you got a good laugh.
i dont understand how people can assemble a system that is really good and have no clue to the abilities of the system they built.
ryan1303 that was not directed at you at all. i have seen numerous people ask if their 2500k with a gtx 580 could play a game at 1920 x 1080 maxed out. its stupid if you ask me that they dont know the answer already.
cbrunnem said:
if this is a serious question then you really need to go back to school or something. if its not a serious question then i hope you got a good laugh.i dont understand how people can assemble a system that is really good and have no clue to the abilities of the system they built.
ryan1303 that was not directed at you at all. i have seen numerous people ask if their 2500k with a gtx 580 could play a game at 1920 x 1080 maxed out. its stupid if you ask me that they dont know the answer already.
Im sure they just wanted to flex their e-peen. Every thread people list these beefy systems and ask " can I run BF3?". Its just human nature to lack subtlety and want attention.
Why does everyone think bf3 is going to be so hard to run? Dice has even stated that the requirements will be pretty similar to bc2, which is far from the most demanding game to run.
Another reason I say this is my brother was in the alpha. He could run it very good, and his pc is significantly less powerful than most of the peoples on here. And that is the alpha, so there was likely still optimization to be done too.
Another reason I say this is my brother was in the alpha. He could run it very good, and his pc is significantly less powerful than most of the peoples on here. And that is the alpha, so there was likely still optimization to be done too.
trogdor796 said:
Why does everyone think bf3 is going to be so hard to run? Dice has even stated that the requirements will be pretty similar to bc2, which is far from the most demanding game to run. Another reason I say this is my brother was in the alpha. He could run it very good, and his pc is significantly less powerful than most of the peoples on here. And that is the alpha, so there was likely still optimization to be done too.
This.
Dice is amazing when it comes to optimizing their games which is why they are one of my favorite developers. People need to just settle down.
cbrunnem said:
if this is a serious question then you really need to go back to school or something. if its not a serious question then i hope you got a good laugh.i dont understand how people can assemble a system that is really good and have no clue to the abilities of the system they built.
ryan1303 that was not directed at you at all. i have seen numerous people ask if their 2500k with a gtx 580 could play a game at 1920 x 1080 maxed out. its stupid if you ask me that they dont know the answer already.
An enthusiast gaming PC with multiple GPU's can run just about any game maxed out. But titles like Crysis, Metro 2033, the GTA4 PC port, and a few others, give even the fastest PC hardware a run for their money.
Games are going to get more intensive and more demanding. Requiring new hardware.
ambam said:
An enthusiast gaming PC with multiple GPU's can run just about any game maxed out. But titles like Crysis, Metro 2033, the GTA4 PC port, and a few others, give even the fastest PC hardware a run for their money.Games are going to get more intensive and more demanding. Requiring new hardware.
your point?
I think that an intel core i5 2500k with a gtx 570 would be able to max out the game just fine. I do not understand why everyone thinks you need a rig for like $2000 to max out the game. Computers are not that expensive anymore, knowing that you can fit a gtx 580 into a 1,200 build. And a gtx 580 will be able to max out the game without a problem.
Its not like they are designing the game for gaming computers with bulldozer or ivy bridge, and a gtx 6xx or a amd 7xxx. Like seriously, that would make no sense. :]
If the game was so graphics intense, many budget gamers would stay away from it. And that would cut their revenue by a lot. So, with that in mind, why would they make a game that no one would be able to run?
That is my point of view. :]
Its not like they are designing the game for gaming computers with bulldozer or ivy bridge, and a gtx 6xx or a amd 7xxx. Like seriously, that would make no sense. :]
If the game was so graphics intense, many budget gamers would stay away from it. And that would cut their revenue by a lot. So, with that in mind, why would they make a game that no one would be able to run?
That is my point of view. :]
doesnt realy matter only an idiot would max out the settings for online. you need your fps to be a minimum, between 60 and 100 fps which means lower gfx to time your fps with your ping and packets... only the most experienced will do this as they know it gives a real and distinct advantage... single player you want 30 fps minimum but multiplayer you need as many as you can get...
a single 570 will max the game with about 45fps. drop the settings and you can double that. for online...@1080p
a single 580 is a waste of money as they dont give a lot more than the 570 but cost 25 percent or more extra. so if your gonna run an sli setup then save quite a bit of cash and get the 570 over the 580...
a single 570 will max the game with about 45fps. drop the settings and you can double that. for online...@1080p
a single 580 is a waste of money as they dont give a lot more than the 570 but cost 25 percent or more extra. so if your gonna run an sli setup then save quite a bit of cash and get the 570 over the 580...
It's just a rumor and not true. Basically they'll try and make it better than 580 by 85%. But I find it a bit too good. I'd say it would be about 50% at max, but hey, that's just me.
Maybe they can do better since the 460 was aimed at 5830, it turned out it even beat it and was a good competitor for the 5850 ( Radeon ).
Maybe they can do better since the 460 was aimed at 5830, it turned out it even beat it and was a good competitor for the 5850 ( Radeon ).
Gman450 said:
It's just a rumor and not true. Basically they'll try and make it better than 580 by 85%. But I find it a bit too good. I'd say it would be about 50% at max, but hey, that's just me. Maybe they can do better since the 460 was aimed at 5830, it turned out it even beat it and was a good competitor for the 5850 ( Radeon ).
If highly overclocked and watercooled, the GTX 680 could be 100% (twice) as fast as the GTX 580.
Now that's damn impressive!
These cards will bring the house down!
I wonder about the performance differential between the Radeon HD 69xx and HD 79xx cards.
ambam said:
If highly overclocked and watercooled, the GTX 680 could be 100% (twice) as fast as the GTX 580.Now that's damn impressive!
These cards will bring the house down!
I wonder about the performance differential between the Radeon HD 69xx and HD 79xx cards.
where are you finding this info? i know a leap in nm process makes the huge tehnical leap in power and cooling and overall performance, but I cant see a 100% jump. Maybe 50%, but not 100. think of when they made the leap to 40nm... it was a huge margin, but not 100% or even 85%
FlintIronStagg said:
where are you finding this info? i know a leap in nm process makes the huge tehnical leap in power and cooling and overall performance, but I cant see a 100% jump. Maybe 50%, but not 100. think of when they made the leap to 40nm... it was a huge margin, but not 100% or even 85%But we should still see a significant jump in performance.
Are there any technical details about the Radeon HD 7xxx series yet?
Guys now you put me in doubt.. I do not know what to do.
I am building a system that I will never sli or crossfire with. I decided to take a gtx 580 over the gtx 570. Should I buy a gtx 580? Or buy the gtx 570 now and upgrade to the 680 when it comes out? We still do not know the price range of the 680, right?
I think I should still stick with the gtx 580, and upgrade when I want.
What would you guys do?
I am building a system that I will never sli or crossfire with. I decided to take a gtx 580 over the gtx 570. Should I buy a gtx 580? Or buy the gtx 570 now and upgrade to the 680 when it comes out? We still do not know the price range of the 680, right?
I think I should still stick with the gtx 580, and upgrade when I want.
What would you guys do?
justjohn5 said:
Guys now you put me in doubt.. I do not know what to do.I am building a system that I will never sli or crossfire with. I decided to take a gtx 580 over the gtx 570. Should I buy a gtx 580? Or buy the gtx 570 now and upgrade to the 680 when it comes out? We still do not know the price range of the 680, right?
I think I should still stick with the gtx 580, and upgrade when I want.
What would you guys do?
if you plan on upgrading to the new series when it comes out I would get the 570 for the price/performance ratio and then you wont be out so much money when you upgrade. If the Xtra smidge of performance is worth the extra money to you, get the 580, if not then the 570 should run just about anything you throw at it on a single monitor
FlintIronStagg said:
Imm sorry, but when the E3 demo was running on a 580, and not maxed out, i doubt the 5850 will run it maxed. Maybe this " alpha" has lower requirements than the single player campaign. His resolution would be the only saving grace that i see for him to have higher settings.Link to prove this please. I've heard some say this is true and others claim it's false. I never remember DICE or EA stating this officially.
FlintIronStagg said:
Imm sorry, but when the E3 demo was running on a 580, and not maxed out, i doubt the 5850 will run it maxed. Maybe this " alpha" has lower requirements than the single player campaign. His resolution would be the only saving grace that i see for him to have higher settings.Perhaps two or three GTX 580's will be able to stomach BF3 on it's highest possible settings.
The next generation of cards are right around the corner. The 28nm HD 7xxx and GTX 6xx.
I might be able to run BF3 with playable framerates with my two crossfired HD 5870's. On my system, I can play the ultimate hardware killer "Crysis" on very high spec and on 1920x1080 and get a playable 30-50 fps. If I apply anti-aliasing, the game becomes too slow to play.
Related ressources:
- ForumI want to build a gaming pc with a $1000 budget to run games on maxed out settin
- ForumI want to build budget pc for $500-$700 to run maxed out 1080p 60fps
- ForumIs a gtx 570 able to run cod blackops 3d maxed out
- ForumWill I be able to Run BF3 ?
- ForumFirst Build - BF3 maxed gaming rig /w SSD
- Forum2x580s for bf3 maxed LOL
- ForumWill I be able to run Starcraft 2 and Battlefield 3 on max settings?
- ForumCan I Max out BF3 ?
- ForumNot able to max out Crysis 3 Alpha with GTX 670?
- ForumPS3, and Wii adding to wired network.
- ForumBF3: The Future or just another Crysis
- Forum[Solved] Maxed Settings in BF3, Far Cry 3?
- ForumBF3 to require EA Origin installation
- ForumWIll Might and Magic 7, 8, 9 run on newer computers?
- ForumHow will FSX play on this setup?
- More resources
Read discussions in other Video Games categories
!