I'm putting together a PC for a friend. This computer will be mostly used for office type work, so speed really isn't an issue. My #1 priority is stability, #2, value. Integrated audio, video, and even modem is good for this application. I've seen boards with integrated video that also have an APG slot, so you upgrade in the future. This is preferred.
As I said, #1 priority is STABILITY!!! I'm looking for the Toyota Corrolla of motherboards here. Somewhat inexpensive, but will run forever, and I don't need a lot of power.
Planning on ordering Crucial memory (SDR is preferred over DDR, but not a big issue for me). Putting a Duron ~800Mhz in it.
Any suggestions are appriciated. Please give me a specific model.
Have just finished setting up the following which is running very nicely. The board has 5 PCI Slot, 1 ISA, 3 Dimm and has intigrated Video and sound.
DFI AM75-TC
Duron 850 Mhz
128 MB SDRAM (Shared - 16 MB for Intigrated Vid)
20 GB Seagate HDD
56 Kps HCF Modem
The only slight problem I had was I put thr Ram in Dimm 1 and it wouldn"t boot, changed to Dimm 3 and away it went.
All the best
INTELigence is gained by obtaining aMD
so you want a cheapest possible solution, and that lies in the SiS730 chipset. I usually dont recommend SMA (Shared Memory Architecture) boards, and for that matter even SiS boards but this one worked just about fine for me. the VIA KM133 is okay but SiS730 has much better video than VIA and so far no compatibility problems have been reported (maybe nobody uses this board to find incompatibilites
)
the board may or may not have any AGP slot, thats left to the motherboard manufacturer. I saw the Jetway <A HREF="http://www.jetway.com.tw/evisn/product/amd/830cn/830cf.htm" target="_new">830CN</A> that had no AGP slot (although it had the provision for AGP slot that is apparent from the PCB traces), neither does the Asus <A HREF="http://www.asus.com.tw/products/Motherboard/socketa/a7s-vm/index.html" target="_new">A7S-VM</A>!
The <A HREF="http://www.msicomputer.com/product/chipset/via_km133.htm" target="_new">MSI boards based on VIA KM133/KM133A</A>, the <A HREF="http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/products/7sdx.htm" target="_new">Gigabyte GA-7SDX</A> do have AGP slot.
hunt around for more options, you will certainly get one to suit your needs!
girish
<font color=blue>die-hard fans don't have heat-sinks!</font color=blue>
Girish>
Thanks for your input, however, as I stated, I'm looking for stability as my first priority, not "cheapest possible solution"
Of those MoBo's you listed, which would be condidered the most stable, or highest quality. This computer will go 500+ miles away when I'm done with it, and I don't want any calls saying that the computer I put together had a catastrophic hardware failure...
Lets forget I even mentioned value, and I am looking for stability as my TOP priority. I care NOTHING about speed compared to other motherboards. This will be an office type PC. The only other thing would be integrated sound, and maybe video, modem, etc...
Thanks again for your help. I'm not trying to discount your advice, but I guess I need to clerify my priorities here...
I have used an Fic AD11 for 2 months. It is very stable and comes with integrated sound. Disadvantages are no extra fan connectors (one for cpu fan, one for chipset fan), only 2 DDR slots, and average performance. Dipswitches are used if you want to change the voltage or multiplier. I am running a 1.2 athlon at 1.33 simply by changing the multiplier from 9 to 10. Only $105 at GPS Computer Services. The cheaper, less reliable motherboards use integrated graphics,modem, etc. but most have integrated sound. For Sdram, I would go with Abit KT7A or KT7E. Abit has good customer support, but no integrated sound, graphics or modem on these boards. Both are listed on pricewatch for less than $100.
Epox 8KHA. best fricken board I've ever known. More stable than um... Kevlar underwear? Seriously though. Fast enough, but it never crashes on me. No matter how hard I try to produce errors and blue screens of death they just don't happen. Also, the temp and voltage reporting is very accurate. Did I mention that I love this board?
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Matthews on 08/08/01 11:36 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
well, then if you want stability, compatibility, cost and upgradeability in that order then I would suggest forget onboard graphics since they might last long, but the stability and performance is an issue with integrated grapics with shared memory. as far as the 830CN with SiS730 is concerned, I did not notice any stability problems although I did not do any heavy duty things on it. so for day to day operation at the office it might be good enough. if you want to have onboard graphics alongwith a possibility of 4X AGP, then I guess VIA KM133 is the only choice since there are more manufacturers using the chipset than the SiS one.
if stability is the #1 requirement, then I would suggest you go for the Asus A7A266 based on ALiMagik chipset. get a cheap graphics card, maybe PCI based old Riva128 or AGP based RivaTNT2 which you might dispose off later for a GeForce3. office apps anyway do not require heavy duty graphics.
you also have an option for SDRAM right now and DDR for later upgrade.
plus, you have one thing not so common among boards these days - it has a real sound chip! the CMedia C8378 supports 4 chanel audio and a host of other features, but most important it is not any AC97 audio where the processor has to do all the work, and that contributes to overall performance of the system.
the stabiliy of this board is solid although wee-bit slow on performance (anyway 4~5% is no big deal, stability is important) there are no compatiility problems reported so far, and its overclocking friendly.
this board has the most mileage of all.
girish
<font color=blue>die-hard fans don't have heat-sinks!</font color=blue>
Get the ECS k7s5a with the sis 735 chipset available for $61.00. Has both ddr and sdr support, stable as a rock, has a decent integrated nic and ac97 audio. The money you save will get you a decent video card and sound card if you don't want the ac'97 sound. Performs on par with the AMD chipset boards and has no via southbridge to contend with.
A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing!
If you want stability get a BX motherboard and a PIII. You can't match that with ANY Athlon settup!
Best value for a BX is the Blaster PC, for $150 you get a case, motherboard, power supply, and integrated Live Platinum sound. Even when combined with the expensive 1GHz PIII it's cheaper than even a Duron processor, mobo, case/power supply, and a Live Platinum.
Look at it this way
Cheapo Duron-$30
Good Duron Mobo-$115
Decent cheap case/power supply $40
SB Live Platinum $150
Total $335
OR
Blaster PC $150
Pentium 1000EB $175
Total $325
So a Blaster PC/PIII 1000EB is cheaper and more stable than a Duron 700 system with the same sound card. And only a moron would say the Duron performs better.
The Blaster PC is available at Tigerdirect. I have verified it to support up to 133 FSB and up to 9.5x multipliers.
Video killed my Radio Card!
$115 for a good Duron MB??
hmmm....a little on the high side there dude!
SiS 735 based MB's are selling in the $60's
So, subtract about $50 from the cost of your Duron setup and the Duron setup is now $40 less expensive.
But wait!
Upgrade it to an Athlon 1.0 ghz or faster with that $40 savings and guess what?
You have a system about 50% faster for the same price!
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
The idea of $150 for a sound card is a rediculous proposition! The ABSOLUTE MOST I would EVER pay for a sound card is $40 for a SB Live! Value. Also, compare apples to apples here... compare your board to a socket A board with integrated sound. Also, for this application, any sound is good sound. I don't need the top-of-the-line sound card. just A sound card, any sound card.
Heck,
Pricewatch lists numerous Athlon based barebones systems (case, PS, MB and CPU for under $200. PLUS the SB Live Platinum is going for less than $100 So...
subtract $50 for cost of MB and $50 cost of SB Platinum....gets cost...according to your figures and my updated figures....$275
Hmmm....
Athlon 1 ghz @ $275 OR...
Piii 1ghz @ $325
We have a winner!
Athlon 1ghz @ $275!
Mark-
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
I thought he was talking about a STABLE system. As in STABILTY being the NUMBER 1 priority. I think that precludes any systems based on generic parts. And my platiunum is the 5.1. And you cannot compare the Live Value, the LIve Drive alone cost over $100 when purchased separately.
In fact, since the Blaster PC comes with the BX chipset on a good motherboard design, manufactured by a reliable manufacturer (shuttle), there are no AMD systems that can match it for stability.
Video killed my Radio Card!
HEY MORON! THIS IS APPLES TO APPLES, FIND ME A SOCKET A MOTHERBOARD WITH INTEGRATED LIVE PLATINUM 5.1 SOUND! IF YOU CAN'T DO THAT, THAN BUY THE FRIGGIN SOUNDCARD, $150!!!
YOUR LACK OF INTEREST IN THE LIVE PLATINUM DOES NOT JUSTIFY A PRICE COMPARISON TO A CHEAPO MOBO WITH INTERGRATED AC97 CODEC! I'M DOING APPLES TO APPLES, YOUR DOING APPLES TO CRAP! Go ahead and get the cheapest crap you can find, I thought stability was the number 1 priority, I guess you lied, don't ask me for any help when your piece of crap blows up in your face!
Video killed my Radio Card!
Sorry but this SIS board stomps the **** out of any bx board. And lets also through in the cost of a network adapter into the equation as the SIS board has that intgrated. Also compare memory bandwith...no comparison. Take of $55.00 dollars for your quoted motherboard coast and then at least another $25.00 for network adapter. With that get a better processor...sorry but no comparison. The BX is good but getting old in a hurry.
A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing!
the iwill ka266 is a good stable board. just dont pay attention to the tomshardware review thats says its unstable. i can keep my computer on for ages under 100% cpu load.
Excuse me but didn't he say that the computer was mainly for office use? Why on earth would he need a sound blaster live 5.1? Yeah sure its a nice card but is it neccesary for his needs? Wouldn't the money be better spent elsewhere?
A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing!
| Quote : Thanks again for your help. I'm not trying to discount your advice, but I guess I need to clerify my priorities here...
|
I thought your priorities were stability uppermost?
As Crash says, the BX is the one.
After a few months of going through the which mobo stuff, I went for a Abit BX133 RAID. No problems. I repeat NO PROBLEMS!
Crashman (or Brashman on this post- sorry Crash LOL) and a few other guys were instrumental in the choosing stages.
Ask for advice. Take it well. Your decision mate.
<b>
If the best things in life are free, why do I keep upgrading my system?
</b>
Ok, everyone settle down
Side Note: I was browsing Pricewatch when I noticed that they had removed the SiS 735 altogether. It used to have its own category as well as the ECS listing. Now nothing....
<font color=red>Change the sig of the week!</font color=red>
Well, he ask for stable, the BX is the most stable. As far as sound goes, I think the SB Live is overrated, in fact, compared with other premium sound systems, it stinks. But I figured anyone who stated stability was the Number 1 issue and then ask about Socket A motherboards would probably know so little about computers as to think the Platinum was a worthwhile investment.
Sure, you can get good BX boards for $30.
Video killed my Radio Card!
SiS 735 more stable than the BX? This I have to see!
Video killed my Radio Card!
735 is rock solid according to reviews...no crashes whatsoever beyond what might be expected of Windows systems.
735 based motherboard is definitely not a generic part. The two manufacturers currently having boards and reviews OF those boards are both under $70 at retail.
As for SB Live. I TOO was referring to SB Live! PLATINUM at under $100. Check out Pricewatch.
Yes, BX is stable, but BX isn't an AMD compatible motherbvoard. The request was for a stable Athlon motherboard. 735 is very stable...probably nearly as stable or as stable as a BX board.
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
I have to agree with crashman on this, for stability go with a p3600-1000 and a bx board. of all the systems I,ve owned ive never had one crash even when overclocking. We have a p3 600 and an asus board in our server and its been running for almost two years and no problems.
I've done so much,for so long,with so little,I'm now qualified to do anything,with nothing,forever!
It's in the ECS listing still...at $65
You can also check out the other manufacturer that has released a board. I forget the one. No matter as there are several others working on boards as well.
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
Find me a Platiunum 5.1 for under $100. Hell, I'll make it easy, find me one for under $115
Video killed my Radio Card!
Only way to find it is by typing in Sis735 with no spaces. Kind of odd. The category listing is gone though.
I can't believe I spent so much time searching for this, but I wanted to make sure I hadn't lost my mind...
<font color=red>Change the sig of the week!</font color=red>
"You can also check out the other manufacturer that has released a board. I forget the one. No matter as there are several others working on boards as well."
Is it amptron?
deez
Sure Crash here's ONE of about a dozen places selling it at under $100. This place is selling it for $86 to $87
http://www.shentech.com/creativelabs.html
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
It's Chaintech, I believe.
ocworkbench.com has a review of both I think.
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
Nope, the cheapest Platinum 5.1 they have is $99 without infrared I/O or remote. The full version cost $179 on that site! Keep guessing!
Video killed my Radio Card!
Well, I checked on pricewatch, and they mentioned amptron. so i went to their site, sure enough, they have one. Going to check out the chaintech one right now though, damn I really need one.
deez
The bx is a good chipset, however it is a dead end. Stuck at AGP 2x, very limited memory bandwith And SDRAM. The user needs stability so for sure stay away from anything to do with VIA ( unfortunalty this makes all AMD chipsets null ass well as they all use VIA southbridge's). But yes the SIS 735 is amazingly stable and for $60 some odd bucks very hard to beat.
A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing!
Whatever you do... DO NOT BUY a Giga-byte 7DXR mobo unless you will not use a geforce chip. ATI works great with 761 chipsets, but Geforce + AMD northbridges = pain, frustration, suicidal thoughts, and tendencies of mass destruction.
I havn't had any problems with geforce with either of 2 AMD 761 boards. I've had geforce 3, and geforce 2 MX 400 inside of an asus A7M266, and a geforce 3 inside of my Epox 8K7A+. And my friend had a regular Geforce 2 GTS inside of his A7M266.
If your not going to play games, your not in need of super big sound capability, speed isn't the biggest issue, and upgrade path isn't to important than the BX chipset is the way to go.
At the moment the SiS 735 might look stable but right now it hasn't even been out for more than two weeks so its not tried and true yet. BX has been out for something like 2 years now.
If all you want is stability and decent speed 600-1000 MHz P3 will do the trick. The fact that its only AGP 2x doesn't mean anything because I doubt you need to play games in the office. I'm sure you can go to www.pricewatch.com and find a nice BX based board from one of the major mainboard manufacturers like Asus, Abit, gigabyte, Epox, and many others. I'd try to avoid ECS and PC Chips like the plague seeing as they are the cheapest of the cheap when it comes to parts, performance, and support. There is a chance this could change slightly with SiS 735 chipset, but its to early to tell the motherboards have only been out barely over a week, it be a very big gamble to get one.
If you insist on getting socket A almost any AMD761 chipset board will give you good stability. I have an Epox 8K7A+ with a 1.4 GHz Tbird overclocked to 1.56 GHz and I never get blue screens and my system is overclocked, so I'd say its safe to say a 1 GHz "C" tbird won't let you down on this board. It also comes with a decent sound chip built into it, I don't know the specifics even though I own it but its still nice enough even for games with only 2 speakers.
So to recap Sis 735 isn't tried and true stay away
BX intel chipset is rock stable, been out for ages
AMD761 is fast and stable (just make sure you buy all brand name parts like ram, video card, and network card or modem)
AMD761 paired with 3com networking, or US robotics modem, in addition to sblive value and nvidia mx will give you a very cheap high performance office PC, with Crucial DDR ram you'll spank a BX with almost the same stability. The key is name brand.
Wow, this thread is sure losing touch with what tchamp originally asked.
Considering this machine will be used mainly for office work and stability is crucial, followed by value (SDR over DDR) and speed is of no concern (anyone notice that?), here is what I would do:
>i815 or BX motherboard
>PII, PIII or even Celeron for cpu
To be honest, I believe the person in front of this machine won't know the difference if it's equipped with a Celeron400 or a PIII800. One of my machines uses a Celeron433 on a NT4Server machine running a full set of services and Office apps > runs like a charm, and I even play Counter-Strike on it too!
I build many PC's (for local shops only) and have been surprised a few times when the owners that are somewhat PC hardware literate ask me "if I have any BX boards lying around?" See, thing is, I provide a great deal of on-site hardware service to my customers (almost all) for FREE. It's part of the way I do business. Do you think I'd want to be doing this for free if every customer was using VIA (or others) hardware configurations? I am not knocking VIA (hey, I have VIA board too!) in any way.
Now, don't turn this into an Intel vs AMD debate. I have examples of both in my home. Yes, I'm even excited about equipping my Athlon with a new SiS mobo when they're available.
While I do admit BX's glory is gone. But it is still 100% feasible and sensible to consider it an option if your customer doesn't care (or even understand) what's under the hood, he or she just wants it to "start". For me in that situation, there's nothing like slapping a HSF on a cpu, plugging in adapters, turning it on and it......works. Damn if I want to be making repeated free visits messing with incompatibility issues, 4-in-1 patches/updates, blah blah blah. That stuff is for us people, not for Joe Blo who wants to email his mom or use Excel to record his CD collection.
Cheers,
Ron_Jeremy
If you loan a friend $20 & never see them again, it was worth it.
Oni it seems you missed the question.
The request was for suggestions for a stable Socket A motherboard. Last I heard that cuts BX boards out...they aren't Socket A.
Regardless of whether you like BX better or not due to percieved stability, it's NOT what the original poster requested. The original poster requested the better choices of stable Socket A boards.
Suggesting a BX board is just moving the board off the topic of the original post and is plain rude.
Suggest what you think is the most stable socket A board or don't.
Don't mean to signle you out of the crowd to criticize and this isn't meant as an attack, as others have done the same thing.
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
The bx is a good chipset, however it is a dead end. Stuck at AGP 2x
| Quote : |
At 89 MHz this AGP 2x is smoking.
<b>
Change the sig of the week!
</b>
On a suggestion from another source, I purchased a Intel D815EEA2 MoBo, and will put a Celeron ~800 in it. (I know, it's not a socket A MB, and it's not an AMD chip..
Oh well)
Thanks for all the help here. This thread has gone out of control, and I'm amazed at the posts in here! Sorry about the sound card thing. I have never had any problems with a sound card, and never heard of it sound card instability, so it wasn't an issue.
This thread has served it's purpose, and if it's possible to close it, let's do so.
Thanks again for the help, and sorry about pissing anybody off. not my intention.
It's not rude at all to suggest an alternative BECAUSE it is extrememly stable. As stated below, I ended up purchasing an Intel D815EEA2 MoBo. (see below)
tchamp,
if it were sugge4sted as one alternative along WITH a stable AMD board that would be one thing. But the posters promoting that were suggesting that AMD MB's are not stable and that's simply not so. Most people will see little problems with stability on an AMD OR an Intel system. It's generally overclockers and hardcore users that would notice instabilities in most cases.
For general use there are a number of perfectly fine AMD AND Intel motherboards available. I just find it inappropriate in a thread CLEARLY starting asking for an AMD (Or Intel for that matter) motherboard suggestion and respondents utterly ignoring that and suggesting the opposite platform.
I guess that's just my personal sensibilities though.
The most common things that can cause instability on AMD platforms is the power supply and memory. But memory can cause problems on Intel systems also. And AMD has a list of recommended/approved power supplies so that shouldn't be an issue.
Mark-
When all else fails, throw your computer out the window!!!
The PIII 750 significantly outperforms the Celeron 800 for around $30 more, if that small price difference is not a sticking point.
Video killed my Radio Card!
If stability is your #1 concern, then an Intel motherboard i815E motherboard and a Pentium III processor would be your best bet.
With AMD solutions, you get more for your money but you have to be willing to put up with a small increase in twiddling...
TL
You did exactly what I recommended. Good choice
TL
There isn't an AMD user in here that hasn't dealt with VIA chipset problems, 4in1 driver problems, 686b problems, memory problems, etc...
The point of reference for the word "Stable" is completely different on the AMD and Intel PIII platform.
To call ANY Athlon/Duron system as stable a BX/PIII system is ludicrous. It just ain't so.
Don't get me wrong. I run an Athlon DDR 1.2Ghz system, and I also run a PIII/BX system. I know what both are capable of, and I know what I have to do to keep each one running.
Frankly, the BX/PIII needs nothing. The only reason I've touched it (it's my server) in the last 6 months is to upate NAV and PCAnyware. It just sits there and churns along happily, day after day.
As for the VIA/Athlon system, there is ALWAYS something to be done. 4in1 upate, driver update, 686b patch, and a dozen other things that I always have to keep on my mind.
This is reality. I choose VIA/Athlon because it's a better price/performance ratio. However, I do it and accept the concequences of that decision WILLINGLY.
I will never, ever tell anyone, anywhere, with a request like was posted here, that ANY AMD system is 100% as stable, trouble-free or worry-free as the BX/PIII platform is.
Because it just ain't so...
TL
Don't know if anyone already said this, but the Iwill KK266 Plus-R comes with 5.1 channel sound. And when I bought my Live!Drive, it caught on fire, so I'm not that excited about it anymore. You can buy a Sound blaster Live! 5.1 card (the one they use in the xgamer 5.1, the mp3-something 5.1, and the platinum 5.1) for about 50 bucks at newegg...
Funny post...why is it you completely left out SIS and ALI chipsets? If I read your post right you say ANY AMD system, but yet only go on to rant about VIA chipsets in conjunction with AMD systems?
A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing!
There are 1111 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

