Divx 6 review

Forum Applications : Multimedia Divx 6 review

Security, Utilities, Anti-Malware

While this review was very thorough on the features of Divx 6.0... it was very incomplete in terms of comparisons. Comparing Divx 6 to WMP9 and Divx 5.2 makes obsolutely no sense to me. Why not compare image quality to WMP10 or Quicktime's h.264?

It would have been nice to see some file size comparisons as well.

Anyone have any additional thoughts or comments?

-mpjesse

"Signatures Still Suck"

Reply to mpjesse

Yes, I completely agree with previous remarks.

This review was massively incomplete. There's no filesize comparisons and the codecs used to compare video quality are rediculous. While it's natural to want to compare quality with MPEG-2, why are we comparing quality to such old codecs when it's obvious they will be outperformed.

Why don't we at least throw in one of the newer codecs like Windows Media 10 or Nero's H.264 codec, one that's been established as one of the best next-gen DVD codecs.

This article almost looks like it was written to benefit DivX Networks and not to be an actual technical review.

Reply to jbdubbs

Ask the community Add a reply

Related content

See all topics related to "Divx 6 review"

Tom's Hardware > Forum > Applications > Multimedia > Divx 6 review

Go to:

Help |
Forum rules

There are 1843 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group

Page generated in 0.504 seconds

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel