Hi there!, if you have a bit of spare time, feel free to read on.
There's a new guy at work who apparently knows a lot about computers and hardware. After a small discussion with him, he treated me like I was dumb and the arguments he used don't seem very solid for me. No big deal about this, but I'd like to know if I should treat him seriously or not
First off, a bit of background info:
My PC has currently a Core i3 540 processor. May be a bit of a basic processor, but it's worked fairly well so far. I wanna upgrade to Sandy/Ivy Bridge next year, depending on benchmarks and price ratio, and leave my current processor and mobo for my bro since he's got no PC. With that, he'd have almost all the necessary parts to build a basic PC.
Okay,
So I asked this guy a bit about OCing, saying I wanted to build a gaming rig. I told him I was thinking about OCing a bit my Core i3 in the meantime till I upgraded, because my graphics card will be arriving soon (HD 6950, although I didn't specify to him, I just said I was getting a card). He just stared at me with a "what's wrong with you" face and told me to buy a PS3. He went on saying OCing should be with a i7 Extreme and nitrogen liquid.
What the hell? Yeah that might be a beast of a CPU/OC but it can't be the only way to go, right? I wouldn't even need anything above probably an i5 2500k and a Hyper 212+ cooler for some OCing to have a pretty decent gaming system, right?
He argued that with a console you don't spend on constant upgrades. That may be right, but games generally look much better on PC than on their console versions, besides that there are many online exclusive PC games as well. With the huge cost difference in here between PC games and PS3 ones, the costs are comparable anyway.
So what do you think? Is it THAT dumb of an idea to think about OCing a bit such a small processor for a few months? Does gaming honestly require a i7 Extreme or a 2600k astronomically overclocked?
Which one do you prefer? Console or PC gaming? If console, which one? This guy said he wants a Wii
There's a new guy at work who apparently knows a lot about computers and hardware. After a small discussion with him, he treated me like I was dumb and the arguments he used don't seem very solid for me. No big deal about this, but I'd like to know if I should treat him seriously or not
First off, a bit of background info:
My PC has currently a Core i3 540 processor. May be a bit of a basic processor, but it's worked fairly well so far. I wanna upgrade to Sandy/Ivy Bridge next year, depending on benchmarks and price ratio, and leave my current processor and mobo for my bro since he's got no PC. With that, he'd have almost all the necessary parts to build a basic PC.
Okay,
So I asked this guy a bit about OCing, saying I wanted to build a gaming rig. I told him I was thinking about OCing a bit my Core i3 in the meantime till I upgraded, because my graphics card will be arriving soon (HD 6950, although I didn't specify to him, I just said I was getting a card). He just stared at me with a "what's wrong with you" face and told me to buy a PS3. He went on saying OCing should be with a i7 Extreme and nitrogen liquid.
What the hell? Yeah that might be a beast of a CPU/OC but it can't be the only way to go, right? I wouldn't even need anything above probably an i5 2500k and a Hyper 212+ cooler for some OCing to have a pretty decent gaming system, right?
He argued that with a console you don't spend on constant upgrades. That may be right, but games generally look much better on PC than on their console versions, besides that there are many online exclusive PC games as well. With the huge cost difference in here between PC games and PS3 ones, the costs are comparable anyway.
So what do you think? Is it THAT dumb of an idea to think about OCing a bit such a small processor for a few months? Does gaming honestly require a i7 Extreme or a 2600k astronomically overclocked?
Which one do you prefer? Console or PC gaming? If console, which one? This guy said he wants a Wii