• Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad

Latest Reviews & Articles

Cyberpower’s Gamer Dragon: Can AMD Bring The Game?

Cyberpower’s Gamer Dragon: Can AMD Bring The Game?

Cyberpower sent us a factory-overclocked Phenom II X4 955 system wielding two Radeon HD 4890 cards in CrossFire. We pit the formidable rig against our previous System Builder Marathon Core i7 machine to see if AMD can deliver a viable gaming alternative. Read more

1.5 TB Low-Power HDDs: Green Gets Big

1.5 TB Low-Power HDDs: Green Gets Big

The latest 2 TB hard drives are still expensive, but 1.5 TB disks provide low power consumption at a better cost-to-capacity ratio. We look at offerings from Samsung and Western Digital to determine the value of taking a step down from the flagships. Read more

ADVERTORIAL Microsoft's BPOS: Q&A for Skeptics

ADVERTORIAL Microsoft's BPOS: Q&A for Skeptics

When a new paradigm like cloud computing or a new platform like Microsoft’s Business Productivity Online Suite (BPOS) comes along, it’s smart to ask tough questions. Read more

MSI Eclipse Plus: Does nForce 200 Boost 3-Way SLI?

MSI Eclipse Plus: Does nForce 200 Boost 3-Way SLI?

With 36 lanes of PCIe 2.0, 3-way SLI could be the X58 chipset’s biggest challenge. If that turns out to be true, is Nvidia’s nForce 200 controller hub, which multiplexes the platform's connectivity, a solution? We compare three configurations to find out. Read more

All the Reviews & Articles
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Wireless Networking > Wireless General Discussions > Dual wirless nic's + wep - one works, one doesn't

Dual wirless nic's + wep - one works, one doesn't

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

I've got DSL running into a Netgear ME102 (802.11b) WAP, direct from the DSL
modem. Directly across the hall (about about 10-15 feet and 4 layers of
drywall), a Windows 2003 Server sits in a closet with the following 3 NIC's:

> Netgear MA301 + MA401 (this is working fine w/ WEP) WAN interface/static
> IP #1
> Netgear MA311 (this won't connect w/ WEP) WAN interface/static IP #2
> Ethernet (to wired LAN)

The MA301 model is a PCI to PCMCIA adapter - a PCI 'sheath' into which you
slide in a PCMCIA NIC to give functionality. I have a Netgear MA401
(802.11b) inserted into the MA301. This device works fine with, or without,
WEP enabled.

Windows 2003 server does not realize that the MA301+401 combo NIC is a
wireless device - it is treated by windows as a standard, wired ethernet
NIC - so there is no 'select a wireless network' dialog for this device, nor
an option to allow windows to handle the wireless network, etc. While
looking at the properties for the NIC if you hit 'configure' and goto the
'advanced' tab (similar to where you go if you wanted to specify 10/100/Auto
on a regular ethernet NIC) the wireless settings such as WEP, etc are found
there, and this is where the NIC must be configured for wireless network
access. You specify SSID & WEP passphrase, connection rate, infastructure,
shared/open, etc.

The other wireless NIC, the MA311, is a standard PCI 802.11b NIC. It is
correctly recognized by windows as being a wireless NIC and as such the
expected windows dialog properties for 2003/XP. It has no passphrase
property in it's advanced configuration, but, on the tab to configure the
detected wirless networks, it allows the entry of a key value (and ordinal
1-4) for each network and a checkbox for whether or not it is shared/open,
etc.

Because the MA301+401 only allows for a passphrase to be entered, within the
ME102 WAP I used a passphrase to generate the same key for all 4 keys. I
assigned the same passphrase to the MA301+401 NIC's passphrase property, and
copied the resulting key into the key prompt for the MA311. The WAP,
MA301+401, and MA311 are all using the same key and/or passphrase, with
direct cut & paste from the WAP config interface so that there are no typos
(esp. with the key). Both NICs were set to use shared-key, infastructure,
128 bit WEP.

Without WEP enabled, this setup works as expected. I established the above
WEP changes yesterday. The MA301+401 is working perfectly across the WEP
connection, without error. The MA311 refuses to establish connection using
WEP. Windows produces 2 messages:

The first message is that of wireless network discovery, and this repeats
now and then. This is caused by the ME102 WAP becomming 'visible' to the
MA311, and then 'disappear', intermittantly. Each time it becomes
available, windows produces a bubble-message at the taskbar indicating that
"new" wireless networks have become available.

The second message occurs when the wireless network is accessed. "Wireless
network unavailable". The signal strength is supposedly 61%, according to
the netgear utility for the MA311. There is no netgear utility installed
for the MA301+401 interface. If I attempt to allow the Netgear Utility to
manage the connection for me (un-checking the windows management from the
NIC properties), there is no change in success. The Netgear utility
indicates that the card is scanning different channels and can't seem to
make up it's mind which one it would like to use. I believe 6 is the
correct channel it should be discovering.

The MA311 NIC is behaving as if enabling WEP has severely degraded it's
connectivity, so much so that it can barely see the WAP, and only for a
brief moment before it falls from view completely - only to appear briefly
again, and repeat. It is not consistant - it can go for long periods of
time where the WAP is simply 100% unavailable to the MA311 NIC. Obviously
it cannot establish or maintain a connection in this state.

The failure of the MA311 is unclear to me. What about the MA301+401, why is
the MA311 failing if the MA301+401 connecting ok? Why does this discrepency
in performance only appear now that WEP is enabled? I am considering
replacing the MA311 with an MA301+401 eBay or something, since they don't
make those anymore and the server / WAP seems to like them (despite it not
quite being recognized properly by windows as a wireless NIC).

Tom's Hardware > Forum > Wireless Networking > Wireless General Discussions > Dual wirless nic's + wep - one works, one doesn't
Go to:

There are 746 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread. Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links