Tom's Hardware > Forum > Wireless Networking > Wireless General Discussions > Hardware Firewall vs Zone Alarm

Hardware Firewall vs Zone Alarm

Forum Wireless Networking : Wireless General Discussions - Hardware Firewall vs Zone Alarm

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

I've been using Zone Alarm since moving to cable internet several years
ago. I just installed a new wireless router, a Linksys Wireless-G
wrt54g. According to the box it comes with the "powerful" SPI firewall.
Any opinions about whether or not this is an improvement over Zone
Alarm?

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

I have both WRT54G and ZA running since ZA gives me more control
especially over outbound traffic.


--
Esquire
brought to you by http://www.wifi-forum.com/

Reply to Esquire

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

JS wrote:
> I've been using Zone Alarm since moving to cable internet several years
> ago. I just installed a new wireless router, a Linksys Wireless-G
> wrt54g. According to the box it comes with the "powerful" SPI firewall.
> Any opinions about whether or not this is an improvement over Zone
> Alarm?
Your hardware firewall can prevent access to your network, but will
assume that everything coming from the network is legit. That is where
your software firewall comes in. When used in conjunction with your
hardware firewall, zonealarm, sygate, norton and the others will keep
you informed of what is trying to connect to the internet. I recommend
that you Keep using them both.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

The WRT54G is not a "true" hardware firewall.

Bill Crocker


"JS" <jrs47@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:8YGCd.35752$Sd5.22856@fe08.lga...
> I've been using Zone Alarm since moving to cable internet several years
> ago. I just installed a new wireless router, a Linksys Wireless-G wrt54g.
> According to the box it comes with the "powerful" SPI firewall. Any
> opinions about whether or not this is an improvement over Zone Alarm?

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

"JS" <jrs47@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:8YGCd.35752$Sd5.22856@fe08.lga...
> I've been using Zone Alarm since moving to cable internet several years
> ago. I just installed a new wireless router, a Linksys Wireless-G
> wrt54g. According to the box it comes with the "powerful" SPI firewall.
> Any opinions about whether or not this is an improvement over Zone
> Alarm?

The basic theory is, "defense in depth," or in other words, layered
security. Thus, having a hardware firewall PLUS host-based firewalls (ie,
ZoneAlarm, Norton, BlackICE, etc) is the right way to protect your machines.

Reply to Jonathan

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

Jonathan wrote:
> "JS" <jrs47@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:8YGCd.35752$Sd5.22856@fe08.lga...
>> I've been using Zone Alarm since moving to cable internet several
>> years ago. I just installed a new wireless router, a Linksys
>> Wireless-G wrt54g. According to the box it comes with the
>> "powerful" SPI firewall. Any opinions about whether or not
>> this is an improvement over Zone Alarm?
>
> The basic theory is, "defense in depth," or in other words, layered
> security. Thus, having a hardware firewall PLUS host-based firewalls
> (ie, ZoneAlarm, Norton, BlackICE, etc) is the right way to protect
> your machines.

The thing to be wary of is something I ran across. A hardware (router based)
and software (computer based) firewall are fine, but two softwares are bad/a
no no. If you have (or upgrade to ) xp sp2, it has a built in firewall that
has to be disabled.

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

"Peter Pan" <Marcs1102NOSPAM@HotmailNOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:34338hF46dicbU1@individual.net...
> Jonathan wrote:
> > "JS" <jrs47@optonline.net> wrote in message
> > news:8YGCd.35752$Sd5.22856@fe08.lga...
> >> I've been using Zone Alarm since moving to cable internet several
> >> years ago. I just installed a new wireless router, a Linksys
> >> Wireless-G wrt54g. According to the box it comes with the
> >> "powerful" SPI firewall. Any opinions about whether or not
> >> this is an improvement over Zone Alarm?
> >
> > The basic theory is, "defense in depth," or in other words, layered
> > security. Thus, having a hardware firewall PLUS host-based firewalls
> > (ie, ZoneAlarm, Norton, BlackICE, etc) is the right way to protect
> > your machines.
>
> The thing to be wary of is something I ran across. A hardware (router
based)
> and software (computer based) firewall are fine, but two softwares are
bad/a
> no no. If you have (or upgrade to ) xp sp2, it has a built in firewall
that
> has to be disabled.

Good point. I completely agree. Only one host-based firewall should be
active.

Reply to Jonathan

Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)

 

On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:07:27 -0800, in alt.internet.wireless , "Peter Pan"
<Marcs1102NOSPAM@HotmailNOSPAM.com> wrote:

>The thing to be wary of is something I ran across. A hardware (router based)
>and software (computer based) firewall are fine, but two softwares are bad/a
>no no.

This is an urban myth. I have run with Blackice and Zonealarm very
successfully for years on the same box - first on NT4, then W2K then XPPro.
One will intercept before the other, so typically one sees very little
traffic, and only catches what the other misses.

--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ <http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html>
CLC readme: <http://www.ungerhu.com/jxh/clc.welcome.txt>

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Wireless Networking > Wireless General Discussions > Hardware Firewall vs Zone Alarm
Go to:

There are 1013 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them