Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain (
More info?)
If you are not a program developer, and are not capable of recoding your
program to eliminate the startup problems IN your program, the utility is
next to useless!
--
Regards,
Richard Urban
aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard
If you knew as much as you think you know,
You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
"Jack" <Jack@nothome.com> wrote in message
news:%23bmi15yYFHA.2288@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Bootvis has a new version out that works well so far.
>
> "Richard Urban" <richardurbanREMOVETHIS@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:OpKDi$$XFHA.2380@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> You will not find bootvis under general Microsoft downloads anymore
>> because there WERE problems that surfaced after SP1. It is not a
>> supported or updated application (to the best of my knowledge). That
>> being said, some still use it without any indication of trouble.
>> Unfortunately, I also am not one of them!
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Richard Urban
>>
>> aka Crusty (-: Old B@stard
>>
>> If you knew as much as you think you know,
>> You would realize that you don't know what you thought you knew!
>>
>>
>> "Rich Bell" <rg_bell@nvbell.net> wrote in message
>> news:uEcooWaXFHA.1148@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> When I trace "Next Boot + Driver Delays" the "Driver Delay" data is not
>>> captured. The Process Creates data is captured. Any ideas why? This
>>> used to work several months ago. I have built a new system with an AMD64
>>> 3400+ processor since the last time I ran Bootvis. Is there a problem
>>> with a 64 bit chip and Bootvis?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>