Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
Has anyone had problems with the LG6000 phone. I have swapped mine twice,
Sometimes it will just cut off.
After I swapped it the last time this one doesn't seem to get as good of
coverage or signal as the one before? (And yes I updated it through *228)
I use mine as a home phone too so I need a reliable .
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
When you swapped it out, did they do the software updates on the phone
and not through *228?
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:24:17 -0600, "Carlos Hathcock"
<Carlos_Hathcock@hotmail.com> wrote:
>Has anyone had problems with the LG6000 phone. I have swapped mine twice,
>Sometimes it will just cut off.
>After I swapped it the last time this one doesn't seem to get as good of
>coverage or signal as the one before? (And yes I updated it through *228)
>I use mine as a home phone too so I need a reliable .
>
>Any ideas/help would be greatly appreciated
>
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:03:28 -0500, T wrote
(in article <309hu0pdl10hb8q62viq3joscn5b05hf4f@4ax.com> ):
> When you swapped it out, did they do the software updates on the phone
> and not through *228?
>
He said that he did that in his original message.
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:24:17 -0600, "Carlos Hathcock"
> <Carlos_Hathcock@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone had problems with the LG6000 phone. I have swapped mine twice,
>> Sometimes it will just cut off.
>> After I swapped it the last time this one doesn't seem to get as good of
>> coverage or signal as the one before? (And yes I updated it through *228)
>> I use mine as a home phone too so I need a reliable .
>>
>> Any ideas/help would be greatly appreciated
>>
>
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
Updating through *228 doesn't upgrade the software, that has to be
flashed on the phone at the Verizon store...
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:13:41 -0500, SinghaLvr <singhalvr@charter.net>
wrote:
>On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:03:28 -0500, T wrote
>(in article <309hu0pdl10hb8q62viq3joscn5b05hf4f@4ax.com> ):
>
>> When you swapped it out, did they do the software updates on the phone
>> and not through *228?
>>
>
>He said that he did that in his original message.
>
>
>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:24:17 -0600, "Carlos Hathcock"
>> <Carlos_Hathcock@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone had problems with the LG6000 phone. I have swapped mine twice,
>>> Sometimes it will just cut off.
>>> After I swapped it the last time this one doesn't seem to get as good of
>>> coverage or signal as the one before? (And yes I updated it through *228)
>>> I use mine as a home phone too so I need a reliable .
>>>
>>> Any ideas/help would be greatly appreciated
>>>
>>
>
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:03:41 -0500, T wrote
(in article <e98ju0plsk0rue46t180u1n81abolcej06@4ax.com> ):
> Updating through *228 doesn't upgrade the software, that has to be
> flashed on the phone at the Verizon store...
>
> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:13:41 -0500, SinghaLvr <singhalvr@charter.net>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:03:28 -0500, T wrote
>> (in article <309hu0pdl10hb8q62viq3joscn5b05hf4f@4ax.com> ):
>>
>>> When you swapped it out, did they do the software updates on the phone
>>> and not through *228?
>>>
>>
>> He said that he did that in his original message.
>>
>>
>>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:24:17 -0600, "Carlos Hathcock"
>>> <Carlos_Hathcock@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Has anyone had problems with the LG6000 phone. I have swapped mine twice,
>>>> Sometimes it will just cut off.
>>>> After I swapped it the last time this one doesn't seem to get as good of
>>>> coverage or signal as the one before? (And yes I updated it through *228)
>>>> I use mine as a home phone too so I need a reliable .
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas/help would be greatly appreciated
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
You are of course correct.
.... there have been some significant upgrades to the VX6000 firmware also
..... and yes, he has to go to the store.
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
What are the significant changes in the updates?
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:33:05 -0500, SinghaLvr <singhalvr@charter.net>
wrote:
>On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:03:41 -0500, T wrote
>(in article <e98ju0plsk0rue46t180u1n81abolcej06@4ax.com> ):
>
>> Updating through *228 doesn't upgrade the software, that has to be
>> flashed on the phone at the Verizon store...
>>
>> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 02:13:41 -0500, SinghaLvr <singhalvr@charter.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 00:03:28 -0500, T wrote
>>> (in article <309hu0pdl10hb8q62viq3joscn5b05hf4f@4ax.com> ):
>>>
>>>> When you swapped it out, did they do the software updates on the phone
>>>> and not through *228?
>>>>
>>>
>>> He said that he did that in his original message.
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:24:17 -0600, "Carlos Hathcock"
>>>> <Carlos_Hathcock@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Has anyone had problems with the LG6000 phone. I have swapped mine twice,
>>>>> Sometimes it will just cut off.
>>>>> After I swapped it the last time this one doesn't seem to get as good of
>>>>> coverage or signal as the one before? (And yes I updated it through *228)
>>>>> I use mine as a home phone too so I need a reliable .
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas/help would be greatly appreciated
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>You are of course correct.
>
>... there have been some significant upgrades to the VX6000 firmware also
>.... and yes, he has to go to the store.
>
>(Sorry)
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
How can I tell if I have the latest firmware?
"SinghaLvr" <singhalvr@charter.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BE10172A00074854F02845B0@nntp.charter.net...
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 04:19:46 -0500, SL wrote
> (in article <9ccku0pqs7arrd7t7tgjgtu5riq465nrcj@4ax.com> ):
>
>> What are the significant changes in the updates?
>>
>>
>
>
> Some of it is UI related. (Such as adding smiley's :-) and carriage
> returns
> to SMS) <-- This alone was enough of a reason for me to upgrade.
>
> It might be just me, but I think the voice dialing seems to work a little
> better now too.
>
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:04:30 -0500, Carlos Hathcock wrote
(in article <sbCdnV1REbev_m3cRVn-tQ@comcast.com> ):
> How can I tell if I have the latest firmware?
>
>
> "SinghaLvr" <singhalvr@charter.net> wrote in message
> news:0001HW.BE10172A00074854F02845B0@nntp.charter.net...
>> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 04:19:46 -0500, SL wrote
>> (in article <9ccku0pqs7arrd7t7tgjgtu5riq465nrcj@4ax.com> ):
>>
>>> What are the significant changes in the updates?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Some of it is UI related. (Such as adding smiley's :-) and carriage
>> returns
>> to SMS) <-- This alone was enough of a reason for me to upgrade.
>>
>> It might be just me, but I think the voice dialing seems to work a little
>> better now too.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
My software ver. is T60VZV06. What is the lastest version ?
"SinghaLvr" <singhalvr@charter.net> wrote in message
news:0001HW.BE1775DB000DD11DF04075B0@nntp.charter.net...
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:04:30 -0500, Carlos Hathcock wrote
> (in article <sbCdnV1REbev_m3cRVn-tQ@comcast.com> ):
>
>> How can I tell if I have the latest firmware?
>>
>>
>> "SinghaLvr" <singhalvr@charter.net> wrote in message
>> news:0001HW.BE10172A00074854F02845B0@nntp.charter.net...
>>> On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 04:19:46 -0500, SL wrote
>>> (in article <9ccku0pqs7arrd7t7tgjgtu5riq465nrcj@4ax.com> ):
>>>
>>>> What are the significant changes in the updates?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Some of it is UI related. (Such as adding smiley's :-) and carriage
>>> returns
>>> to SMS) <-- This alone was enough of a reason for me to upgrade.
>>>
>>> It might be just me, but I think the voice dialing seems to work a
>>> little
>>> better now too.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
> On the VX 6000
> Menu ... 9 ...9 ... 2
>
Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?)
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:21:45 -0500, Carlos Hathcock wrote
(in article <0O6dndcEU_XGVGjcRVn-gw@comcast.com> ):
> My software ver. is T60VZV06. What is the lastest version ?
>
I have T60VZV08
I *think* this is the latest version. (Updated 3 weeks ago). Since they
have moved on to the 6100 I doubt if we'll see too many more updates for the
6000.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.