Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.perform_maintain (
More info?)
It isn't that I want to do a backup. I was talking about partition sizes.
Wondering if one size were any better than another. So far, there doesn't
seem to be any good reason to partition a hard drive when using Windows XP.
I guess it's a thing of the past.
"DaveDouglas" <dndzz%remove%@rogers.com> wrote in message
news:ucBy$7HiFHA.3300@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> What about doing an Image of your C drive to a DVD? Would you like to
> backup to 1 DVD or many?
>
> Sandman wrote:
>> A lot of people partition a HD, and for whatever their reasoning, it
>> makes
>> no sense to me, since there is no useful redundancy here; if a drive
>> fails
>> you lose everything on the drive anyway. It also will affect the NTFS
>> system
>> in XP that places files etc in a certain order which makes access to them
>> more efficient; seeking on the HD...If you have 2 separate OS; like
>> Windows
>> ME on 1 partition and XP on the other, I guess that is a good reason to
>> do
>> it.. (a dual boot situation) I don't think you can install XP on a drive
>> and the Programs and files (whatever you mean by that) on another drive.
>> And
>> if you could; for what purpose?
>> "Terry" <talker2002-unsubscribe-@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23mGIX6%23hFHA.2644@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>At what size is it best to partition a hard drive for maximum speed while
>>>using Windows XP Home?
>>>
>>>Is there any benefit to having the OS on a physically separate Hard Drive
>>>and all other programs and files on another?
>>>
>>>TIA,
>>>
>>>Terry
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram