G
Guest
Guest
I decided to write this email
precisely to ask more detailed information according overclock. I wish
first of all say that I'm not a fanatic believer in overclock, ( this one would be the first one), I'm not a fanatic of speed. To me it's only a
way to make my hardware a little bit "younger" without spend a huge amount of money in trying to follow the too (to me at least!) fast development of hardware!
I red already all the reviews written by tomshardware's guys about this subject, and I have
understood that overclocking my system may not be so trivial. My computer is
composed by a MB Asus P2B-F, 128 MB SDRAM PC-100, HD IBM DTTA 14.4 GB,
ATI rage FURY MAXX, SB live!, pioneer DVD 16x-40x, 8x4x32x Waitec CD-RW,
adapter card FC-PGA - slot1, PIII coppermine 600E. I will upgrade my system with 128 MB of SDRAM PC133 shortly and the new HD IBM DTLA 30 GB + controller promise HOT-U-ATA100.
My first question concern the controller promise (this is not an overclock at all,OK! But I wish to profit of your technical knowledge guys!!) : I know that U-ATA33 is
not sufficient to get the whole speed of this new HD IBM. Do you think that installing a novel controller could be the right solution or rather, would be useless, for example for intrisical limitations in the MB for example or for other reasons?
In a second time, (and here we come to the true overclock!!) when my computer will get older, I wish to rise the bus from 100 Mhz to 133. In some reviews I red that the most serious concern about overclock of systems based on 440BX chipset, are
AGP port and PCI. For AGp I should be fine. I 've seen some tests showing that ATI RAGE fury MAXX works even with stressed AGP.
Unfortunately I was'nt able to find any information about PCI in my MB, in particular regarding the problem of dividing the clock speed by 4.
I've seen a report about overclocking the ASUS P3B-F up to 133 Mhz which seems to work fine. Asus P3B-F looks really
similar to my P2B-F. I guess it should be possible even with the P2B-F.
Am I right? If this is the case, is there something else I should check?
thanks to everybody who will respond!
precisely to ask more detailed information according overclock. I wish
first of all say that I'm not a fanatic believer in overclock, ( this one would be the first one), I'm not a fanatic of speed. To me it's only a
way to make my hardware a little bit "younger" without spend a huge amount of money in trying to follow the too (to me at least!) fast development of hardware!
I red already all the reviews written by tomshardware's guys about this subject, and I have
understood that overclocking my system may not be so trivial. My computer is
composed by a MB Asus P2B-F, 128 MB SDRAM PC-100, HD IBM DTTA 14.4 GB,
ATI rage FURY MAXX, SB live!, pioneer DVD 16x-40x, 8x4x32x Waitec CD-RW,
adapter card FC-PGA - slot1, PIII coppermine 600E. I will upgrade my system with 128 MB of SDRAM PC133 shortly and the new HD IBM DTLA 30 GB + controller promise HOT-U-ATA100.
My first question concern the controller promise (this is not an overclock at all,OK! But I wish to profit of your technical knowledge guys!!) : I know that U-ATA33 is
not sufficient to get the whole speed of this new HD IBM. Do you think that installing a novel controller could be the right solution or rather, would be useless, for example for intrisical limitations in the MB for example or for other reasons?
In a second time, (and here we come to the true overclock!!) when my computer will get older, I wish to rise the bus from 100 Mhz to 133. In some reviews I red that the most serious concern about overclock of systems based on 440BX chipset, are
AGP port and PCI. For AGp I should be fine. I 've seen some tests showing that ATI RAGE fury MAXX works even with stressed AGP.
Unfortunately I was'nt able to find any information about PCI in my MB, in particular regarding the problem of dividing the clock speed by 4.
I've seen a report about overclocking the ASUS P3B-F up to 133 Mhz which seems to work fine. Asus P3B-F looks really
similar to my P2B-F. I guess it should be possible even with the P2B-F.
Am I right? If this is the case, is there something else I should check?
thanks to everybody who will respond!