I would be using it to tap in to my parents DSL when visiting. They
have an IMAC conected directly to a DSL modem. I figure with on of
these I could plug it into the DSL line and plug the IMAC into the
ethernet port. Then access the wireless network with my laptop. Also I
could use it traveling else where.
The question is which would be better. Considering range and ease of
use.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
Spyro <visionary@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I am trying to decide between these two portable routers:
>
> Wireless-G Travel Router
> http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Sat [...] torWrapper > Wireless-G Compact Router
> http://www.linksys.com/servlet/Sat [...] torWrapper >
> I would be using it to tap in to my parents DSL when visiting. They
> have an IMAC conected directly to a DSL modem. I figure with on of
> these I could plug it into the DSL line and plug the IMAC into the
> ethernet port. Then access the wireless network with my laptop. Also I
> could use it traveling else where.
Archived from groups: alt.internet.wireless (More info?)
I imagine you are asking William that question.
Anyways I ordered the "Wireless-G Compact Router". As I do not need SES
and thought the power cord would be nice to position the unit in a
stategic spot as opposed to at the socket.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.