Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > HP Laserjet 1000 shared and spooler issue

HP Laserjet 1000 shared and spooler issue

Forum Windows XP : Windows XP General Discussion - HP Laserjet 1000 shared and spooler issue

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.print_fax (More info?)

 

I have an HP Laserjet 1000 connected to a PC via it's default USB/parallel hybrid connection. It is shared across the network via "File and Print Sharing". I have a laptop in the same Workgroup and this printer is mapped on it.

The problem is that the printer always appears "Offline" and when I attempt to view the printer properties I receive an error message that the print spooler needs to be started. When I check the spooler service, it is already running and is set to start automatically. I have tried stopping and restarting the service but to no effect. I am able to print to other printers on the network though they are not in the same Workgroup. This is the only printer in that Workgroup. I am able to ping between the laptop and the PC hosting the printer so network connectivity is not the issue.

I thought that spoolsv.exe might be corrupt so I ran SFC but it did not find an issue. I thought the problem might also be related to the user's firewall. He is running them on both the laptop and the PC. However, I have double checked the configuration and have this same problem when they are disabled anyway.

Could this be related to the fact that it is on a USB connection or is it more likely that the problem resides with spoolsv.exe being corrupt? If it is corrupt is there a way to re-install it without having to re-install the whole OS?

Thanks.

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Windows XP > Windows XP General Discussion > HP Laserjet 1000 shared and spooler issue
Go to:

There are 1287 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them