3DMARK 2000 scores

Unolocogringo · Feb 26, 2001

Iwas trying to compare my performance to other computers,but on Mad Onion's website it dosen't give you all the system specs or if it is overclocked etc.So i really have no real way to fully compare.all posts would be appreciated.
thanks in advance rick

asus P3V4x
P3 550e@814 1.75v 148fsb
Annihilator 2 32mb 235/370
128mb micron pc133 cas3 at 148fsb
10 gig Western Digital 7200 rpm udma66
Vortex 2
52x cdrom
Soho nic
Best Data 56k modem
floppy

http://gamershq.madonion.com/compare.shtml?1310492
6951 3D MARKS

Makaveli · Feb 26, 2001

U got that score at what resoultion, and color depth?

Unolocogringo · Feb 26, 2001

i ran the default benchmark 1024x768 16bit color

Red_Zealot · Feb 27, 2001

That's a darn good score. On my first system, a Dell (I was young and impressionable), I managed to get a 5200. For some reason (FSB?!), your processor just killed mine, but mine is an 850 MHz (Not overclocked - damn OEM's). My graphics card on that system is a Geforce 256, and yours is a GTS/Pro, both 32MB. I would say that your score is really good.

"If you teach a child to read, then him or her will be able to pass a literacy test" - George W.

Grizely1 · Feb 28, 2001

ASUS A7V133
AMD Thunderbird 1.1GHz @ 1.212GHz
GeForce2 GTS 32MB DDR
128MB Infineon PC133 CAS2 @ 134MHz (lol)
50GB of Maxtor Draco II hard drive space
SB LIVE! X-Gamer 5.1
50x CD-ROM
Datalink 10.100 nic card

I got 7640

-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone would ever need!"

Bill Gates, 1980s

Guest · Feb 28, 2001

Anyone know why my the 3dMark test just shuts down partway through on me? It doesnt cause any problems, just shuts right the hell down

) err ;(... it worked fine on my PIII 450, but this is an AMD KT7A-Raid set up... should I slow my processor down? It doesnt have any problems usually 850 @ 980.....

I havnt even overclocked the RAdeon yet, and i got it up to 190 or so on my PIII 450... new drivers installed and everything

Old addage: "Users never prosper"

) Long live the tweakers

Crashman · Feb 28, 2001

Your right on par with similar systems.

Suicide is painless...........

Unolocogringo · Mar 1, 2001

IF your running W2K have you done the microsoft update for amd with geforce card yet? if not W2K then you may need to back off the overclock a little for stability or try upping the I/O voltage to see if it helps stabilize things. just a few things to try.

Unolocogringo · Mar 1, 2001

Griz with that system you should be killing me on score, but your only getting about 10% better. Looks like you need to tweek a little more.(LOL)

Guest · Mar 1, 2001

wusy, your a friggin genius

it has to do with stability or something... the 3dmark tester is EXTREMELY sensitive when it comes to oc'ing... so I have to back it off a bit for it.. thakns bro

Old addage: "Users never prosper"

) Long live the tweakers

Bubba · Mar 1, 2001

Well, I guess I will post mine.

A7V Duron 600@1GHz
512MB PC133 cas2 crucial
Geforce2 Ultra 64MB
~7600 Standard benchmark
WindowsME

phsstpok · Mar 1, 2001

Hey, Bubba. Noticed your scores are going up! You overclocking the Ultra now or did you do some mobo tweaks?

Bubba · Mar 1, 2001

It was a Duron 600@950 with a GeForce2 GTS 64MB and I got at score of about 6500. Then I got a GeForce2 Ultra 64MB (for free

) and my score upped to 7100. Then I upped my FSB to 105 to get my Duron up to 1GHz and now my score is around 7500-7600.

But I must say, the increased FSB is making my computer a bit unstable even with the voltage increased. Also, I was very disappointed with the GF2U. It really didn't do all that much for my score in my opinion and all my games don't look a bit different than they did with the GF2 GTS. In my opinion, the GF2U is not worth the money. For those of you wonder, my advice would be to save some bucks and just get the GF2 GTS.

And what really frosts my cookies is that when I compare my scores to others on Madonion with a Duron at 1GHz and the GF2U, they all have scores in the 8000's and 9000's. I really don't know what they are doing that I am not. Maybe its the OS (I'm using WinMe) and maybe I have too many programs running in the background (mouse software, soundblaster liveware, and blackice defender).
I just don't know. But since I don't notice a difference in gameplay, I don't see the need for such a card. Its just for bragging rights when comparing benchmarks and apparently I have lost.
All I care about is that I can clearly see you in my sniper scope in Unreal Tournament.

phsstpok · Mar 1, 2001

The Ultra's really shine at higher resolutions. I would just like to be able to play at 1280x1024 but since I only have a 15" monitor I have stuck with my Geforce256 card. An Ultra and a big monitor would be great but they will have to wait.

Have you considered moving up to a Tbird. Seems Tbirds get about 1500-2000 more points in 3D Mark 2000 than their Duron counterparts do using the same class video card. Must be the larger cache that does it.

Unolocogringo · Mar 2, 2001

mad onion has a page with tweeks for your card to get higher scores. like turning off fsaa, turning off v-sync,use page flipping for open gl,overclocking, etc. so check it out you might get higher score. dont know what tweeks your running now......

Bubba · Mar 2, 2001

Yes, I have considered a T-Bird. Now all I need to know which one of you is going to give me the money to buy it. Not just one person needs to send me money, you all can if you want. You can take up a collection, have a fund-raiser, or even a telethon. I don't care how you get me the money, just get it here.
Thanks.

phsstpok · Mar 2, 2001

You have an Ultra! You must have money to burn! What's another few hundred dollars? lol!

phsstpok · Mar 2, 2001

You can try the <A HREF="http://www6.tomshardware.com/business/00q4/001114/" target="_new">AMD Roadmap</A> here at THG but I don't think any speeds are given.

Bubba · Mar 3, 2001

I didn't pay for the Ultra. Someone gave it to me.

Grizely1 · Mar 3, 2001

Actually I haven't tweaked at all, and CPU speed doesn't really have a big impact on 3Dmark scores.

-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone would ever need!"

Bill Gates, 1980s

TheSandman · Mar 4, 2001

Well here is my score and sys.

3dmark = 6300's

sysytem = 800 duron GF2 256ram @100 cl2, 4way on k7t turbo-r

SANDMAN

Guest · Mar 4, 2001

On my P4 and o/c gf2 (250/370) ,i got:

640x480 x 16 :8347 3dmarks
1024x768 x 16 :7279 "

according to the official ratings anything over 7001 and NOT 7000 (j/k) is insanely fast. I am sure ppl get better than over though. The weird thing is that i compared the two and i think gamespy in teh background didn't help the 640 x 480 one as it was worse in some framerates...

Come on down to http://www.codingclick.com- The ultimate coding resource!!Edited by Petesmc on 03/04/01 01:05 PM.

Grizely1 · Mar 5, 2001

SWEET MY COMPUTER BEATS A PENTIUM4 HAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone would ever need!"

Bill Gates, 1980s

igottaknife · Mar 5, 2001

ASUS A7V
1000MHz TBird non O/C
256 Micron CAS2
GeForce2 GTS 64MB

Well if you hadn't read my "Dumbass" post you would see I got a 6985, but I'm running Win2k and I've seen scores dip 40% by switching to Win2k from WinME/9x

Take my advice with a grain of salt, for I AM A DUMB-ASS!!!

Grizely1 · Mar 5, 2001

Cool. You should overclock

well looking at the other scores I guess my score was pretty good! LOL

-----------------
"648kb is all the space anyone would ever need!"

Bill Gates, 1980s

3DMARK 2000 scores

Illustrious

Splendid

Illustrious

Distinguished

Splendid

Guest

Guest

Polypheme

Illustrious

Illustrious

Guest

Guest

Distinguished

Splendid

Distinguished

Splendid

Illustrious

Distinguished

Splendid

Splendid

Distinguished

Splendid

Distinguished

Guest

Guest

Splendid

Distinguished

Splendid

Share this page