Despite my criticism of the "phoney" remarks elsewhere in this forum, which I think left a bad aftertaste for this review, I thought that Tom's review was very good overall. I liked the layout of the anand review and the indepth look at some of the heatsinks (which maybe tom could have done more of) but overall, I think Tom's was the better, more useful review. That's not to take anything away from Anand - his review was also good.