I have a couple of points. First of all I think that a forum like this one is a place where people of differing opinions should be able to express those opinions without being roasted over the coals. I don't think that we should be trying to always justify our answers to every post we make. It is stupid and a waste of time. If we all agreed on everything all the time we would still be using the IBM PC and motorola microprocessors.
Anyway, I guess I have to justify myself ... so hear it goes (and I'll try to be nice about it).
<<<<<in reply to: "If you look at the pix tom takes of the unit it looks to be to be a very mediocre heat sink." I say: The thing is huge and wide! >>>>
The silverado aluminmum heat sink is no wider or bigger than other alum sinks on the market. Look at the global win FOP 38 for example. The reason why I made my original point is that I am curious why the silverado DID SO WELL!
<<<<<<in reply to: "Also, silver is only moderately more heat conductive than copper, so I honestly don't think the silver disc has that much to do with the excellent performance of the silverado unit" I say: Silver is decently more conductive than copper, and it dissipates heat better.>>>>>
Silver is 7% better at heat conduction than copper. Interestingly copper is 81% better at heat conduction than aluminum. Consider thermal conductivities. I found this on a web site but you could find it in any physics text book. There are a few substances that are at the top of the thermal conductivity charts, namely:
Diamond (2300 W/mK)
Pyrolytic Graphite (1950 W/mK)
Silver (429 W/mK),
Pure Copper (401 W/mK), and
Pure Aluminum (237 W/mK).
Of course, diamond and the graphite stuff are so expensive we can't use them, so they are off the list of possible materials.
Note, however, that the thermal conductivity for silver is 429 and copper is 401 (higher is better). So silver performs only 7% better than copper (I worked it out). That's why I think the silver disk on the bottom of the heat sink is a good idea, but it will perform only marginally better than a properly designed all copper heat sink.
Also, I don't have time to look it up right now, (it is somewhere on this message board thought) but if you were to build a heat sink out of pure copper and build another one out of pure aluminum, the copper heat sink will outperform the aluminum one. Many believe that aluminum is a better heat radiator than copper, but this is not true. If I find the link I will include it later. But the reason why copper heat sinks right now are not performing really well (and I think there are several which are, such as the swiftech MC 462 which uses the solid copper base) is that copper is much harder to form, mold, cut, work with etc. Amuminum is easier to shape, so the fins etc are easier to make etc.
<<<<<in reply to: "perhaps my thoughts are not worth considering" I say: You got that right! Just joshing you>>>>>
Let's try to stay civil on the message boards.
<font color=blue>You don't know what it is, but it's there. Like a splinter in your mind.</font color=blue>