i got to say i thought it would look much different, but thats not the case here. there are a few glitches but this is a beta software. as far as how well you can costumize it, i'd have to say pretty damn well. performace is also good, but i don't think you should switch to longhorn with a sub 1ghz pc. it looks very nice too. i can see it has some "features" that aren't tied with anything yet... hmm...
i think microsoft is doing very well. now the only thing i don't like the sound of is fuckkin Palladium.
<font color=orange><b>these days every one knows how small your penis is, and they are dying to help you with many many penis enlargement emails.
Microsoft is doing a poor job in terms of innovation. All the "new" "features" are old features in Mac OS X and various *nix OSes.
Then again, it is still a very very early version and (hopefully) better things will be included and implemented in both the front-end and the back-end.
Disregard my previous post.
<font color=blue>
Men don't use Viagra because they're impotent, but because some women are just butt-ugly.
<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by sTiCk_E_mOuSe on 03/27/03 10:07 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Pretty much yeah. The pager utility that has been awesome in Xwindows for years has just started to become part of the MS world. I've got a lame version of it in the MSVDM by microsoft now, and Longhorn looks like it improves on it, but it's just catching up to where linux was years ago.
Some day I'll be rich and famous for inventing a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
Submit your opinion <A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/community/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=28537#28537" target="_new"> Should Tom Fire Omid? </A>
Submit your opinion <A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/community/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=28537#28537" target="_new"> Should Tom Fire Omid? </A>
IIRC Windows Whistler was Windows XP, and when it was first out initially, it was using the old Windows interface. Longhorn is that IMO, an early non-representative release.
I am still pissed that the 3d Windows is no longer in development, as they had stated LH to be in 3d. It better be so by 2005, plenty of time to optimize till then.
--
This post is brought to you by Eden, on a Via Eden, in the garden of Eden.
as far as innovation, it does suck ATM, but its at very early stage right now... don't judge it yet. one major problem right now with it is the picture and fax viewer. but it is sad to see ms implementing working and functional features that have existed in other OS's.
<font color=orange><b>these days every one knows how small your penis is, and they are dying to help you with many many penis enlargement emails.
COOL
Phew you got me worried there partner. I want to get this ME [-peep-] out of my puter as soon as possible and XP just doesnt strike my fancy. Hows it? System hog? New interface? How good is it for Internet/office apps.
<b><font color=blue>Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia</b></font color=blue>
yea right scammy! do you think i am a gulla-bull? or even a gulla-calf? yeeaaaaaa right! as if we wouldnt notice! rofl
now that thats off my chest.. im glad they didnt release a 3d os, that would be stupid. 3d accelleration required for an os???? thats just retarded. it will happen sooner or later and can have advantages but 2d windows will suffice for quite some time. i remember seeing an exibition version of an internet explorer concept. it was like swimming through a web page, i thought i was going to puke lol.
my computer is so fast, it completes an endless loop in less than 4 seconds!
many programs that are free out there are not designed for "switching: users and will crahs XP every time you swotch back to a user.
also having too many windows open can do it every time (well with my 1Gb of ram i have been ok so far but i havn't had 13 programs open yet with some rendering and others encoding divX, while others are image editing)
as for drivers well XP suchs and i have had SUCH HUGE crashes that SAFE MODE won't even start.
why did that happen (coz i installed Nvidia deninator drivers)
for me windows ME has only occasionally crashed and always rather small crashes but XP crashes on a far more major scale.
have you ever seen XP re-load EXPLORER and your task bar along the bottom. (well i have) this is XP's unique way of CRASHING without the user knowing about it.
i haev had MSN crash so often you can't use it.
IE crash causeing all the windows to close and the computer need to re-boots to return to full speed.
XP is no perfect operating system.
and you can't boot into dos if it fails to load in safe mode.
5 re-installs
3 of which involved 100% format of HDD
XP got so twisted i couldn't help it.
the load up sound totally cut up and blocky you couldn't belive
Winamp skips MP3 files, unknown and unexpected CPU usae of up to 60-70 % basicly XP got so twisted i deleted everything and started again.
by the way i only had my computer for about 1 month.
VERY crazy!!!!
but yes i admit it is probably me!!!!!! (i really should stop loading opensource programs onto my computer)
I've run 3dsmax doing a render + photoshop for editing my textures + kazaa lite + winamp + email + mozilla + seti + seti spy + trillian + a few other things on 512 MB, and yeah, it gets slow but nothing crashes.
Re-loading explorer doesn't mean XP crashed at all. It means a program that uses explorer crashed and froze up your explorer. XP killed the process and re-loaded it. If XP had crashed, the computer would not have been able to recover.
That right there is a HUGE difference between XP and ME. You can run buggy code and crash programs left right and centre on XP and you can keep on going. With ME, a crash of a program more often than not will crash the entire OS.
Some day I'll be rich and famous for inventing a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
HE he he "ME"
But Doood the thing is i'm stuck with 256 mb ram which honestly is'nt enough for xp to run smoothly. I tried installing XP but the games ran like [-peep-] on it fram e skips and all e.g. mafia ran better on Me than on xp.
Damn i wish i could go back to windows 97. It was good IMO
<b><font color=blue>Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia</b></font color=blue>
thats not because of you ram... well it is but not much at all. its prolly more with your vid card and its drivers. i have run xp on many 256 meg comp and it was pc100 ram too, but it was fine. i have even ran it on 128mb comps, now that does fime too, but no for gaming and stuff.
<font color=orange><b>these days every one knows how small your penis is, and they are dying to help you with many many penis enlargement emails.
hmmm honestly i would like to say there must be something wrong with the way the pc is configured or some thing like that, but i can't since i don't know
<font color=orange><b>these days every one knows how small your penis is, and they are dying to help you with many many penis enlargement emails.
You're not alone in this. The problem with XP is once it truly crashes, or when it does, often they are fatal crashes. The problem as well is that it is so user-friendly, it covers key functions that could help you out of a situation. Without DOS or anything, it simply is not easy to recover once you no longer can boot into WinXP.
I had 2 formats in 2 weeks due to bootup problems.
I truly fear the next time WinXP does that. Problem is, it is trustable in that it is stable in general usage, but it is by far the most sensitive OS to small bad code. A small one, whether it's an old DOS game or an old driver, can screw the whole temporal lobe that is WinXP, and you no longer can boot at all. It is however a new hybrid OS, and I hope with Longhorn, Microsoft has tweaked the OS far more in stability. I can locate plenty of bugs as well.
Such include that when you shut down, sometimes it takes so long at the Saving Settings or such when you know it could simply close all programs no matter what, or the bug when you shut down too quickly after closing some program, sometimes the OS will not display LOGGING OFF, will just show the big blue-purple logon screen, but no message that says in which phase of shutting down has it reached. It hangs from there.
An annoying one as well is when it just doesn't know what to do. You expect usually a program to open at the same speed if all the rest has not been touched, but sometimes, re-opening it will take a small delay hit for no reason, like IE6 opening, or OE6.
I don't get why it does it on purpose to bloat itself as if XP had a pipeline, and it flushed it at the moment I request a program load, so I have to wait till it fills back.
Still, if you asked me if I'd go back to any Win9x OS, I'd say hell no, WinXP by far is the best. Beats Win2000 IMO when it comes to home use and ease of configuration.
--
This post is brought to you by Eden, on a Via Eden, in the garden of Eden.
What I wanna see in "Longhorn", in addition to more stability, is MORE SECURITY. That and much faster patchings of known security holes. Seems like it takes MS ages to patch some of their holes.
Disregard my previous post.
<font color=blue>
Men don't use Viagra because they're impotent, but because some women are just butt-ugly.
I was using 3x.xx detonators then. COuld that be the prob? Hey now gimme a final word of advice should i or shuld i go to xp if yes then which one home or pro or do you recommend any other version.
<b><font color=blue>Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia</b></font color=blue>
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.