Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Chemical Weapons Found?

Chemical Weapons Found?

Forum Old Man/Woman's Club : Other - Chemical Weapons Found?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Page:    Previous 1 2 3 Next Bottom Search this thread
Word :    Username :           
 

Here's the link. It appears to be an early report, but NPR is usally pretty reliable. Time will tell....

<A HREF="http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20030407_214.html" target="_new">http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20030407_214.html</A>

Any man can withstand adversity...The true test of character is to give a man power <i>Abraham Lincoln</i>

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Yeah, I posted this in one of the other threads. I'm sick of all the false alarms though so I'll wait and see.

<font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

I'm assuming this is with respect to all the vials. Apparently they still don't have results ready and they still could be chemical agents

<A HREF="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/07/iraq/main548171.shtml" target="_new">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/04/07/iraq/main548171.shtml</A>

Take it all with a grain of salt.

<font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

See, the thing is this... The Bush administration is saying Sadaam is a danger because of a risk of unprovoked attack on us with chemical/biological weapons. Now, we are provoking the hell out him right now, to the point where he isn't going to be leader of Iraq in a couple more weeks, yet he didn't use any nasty weapons. Why is that??? Maybe he doesn't have any chemical weapons anymore.

But, time will tell. If in awhile our troops do really find chemical weapons, then that answers parts of the questions. But, if our troops never find any chemical weapons, then I really, really think that would look bad for Bush.

-------------------------------------------
<font color=blue> "Trying is the first step towards failure." </font color=blue>

Reply to ksoth

He's use them unprovoked in the past. So he might just use em again. Having said that, he needs his men to actually use em. Perhaps they've decided not to for possible repercussions from coalition forces.

<b><font color=blue>~ <A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=324&s=58e94ba84a16bedfebbf0f416d5bac48" target="_new">System Specs</A> ~<font color=blue></b> :wink:

Reply to camieabz

If anything, orders are not being communicated. The chain of command is so badly beaten down that they seem to be giving orders by way of the press.

<font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

CNN now, apart from Global News here in Canada, has also reported the findings. They have been sent to the US for research, and hopefully it won't take long. I personally wish it will end up what Bush said, because then, it would indeed prove to the world what Bush has been saying, and perhaps wake the world up and hey, PERHAPS -once more-, help the US defeat this leader and re-create a country shaped on better democracy and god knows, less monkey acting sheeps.

--
This post is brought to you by Eden, on a Via Eden, in the garden of Eden. :smile:

Reply to eden

Funny you should mention sheep.

I was saying to someone the other night that I'd like to get Saddam alone without henchmen or power and ask him what gave him the right to have such a lack of respect for people's rights.

It came to me very quickly what his reply would be like...

"If they behave like sheep, I will shepherd them" or something equally egotistical.

There's no way to ever change this guy's mind, especially now he's on the run. My only hope is that no-one obeys his orders to use chem weapons.

<b><font color=blue>~ <A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=324&s=58e94ba84a16bedfebbf0f416d5bac48" target="_new">System Specs</A> ~<font color=blue></b> :wink:

Reply to camieabz

I don't know whether you saw a programme on BBC2 last night called War Zone. All about Saddam and his rise into power, the Kuwait invasion etc etc.

And right there, in front of the cameras, former members of his government and military confirmed that he did, and still does have weapons of mass destruction.

<font color=blue>"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum" - Roddy Piper</font color=blue>

Reply to RobD

Yup. I also saw how his men were terrorising folk already broken.

What was the commander's orders?

"Slit their throats and cut their hearts in two!"

Lovely! Just the kind of guy you want running around your neighbourhood at night.

<b><font color=blue>~ <A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=324&s=58e94ba84a16bedfebbf0f416d5bac48" target="_new">System Specs</A> ~<font color=blue></b> :wink:

Reply to camieabz

And how people who didn't tow the party line being executed. What a wonderful regime.

<font color=blue>"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum" - Roddy Piper</font color=blue>

Reply to RobD

I know that finding chemical weapons in Iraq would be a good thing for Bush's world standing. However, Saddam has the unfortunate combination of evil ambition and power to excerise that ambition. Finding chemical weapons is not the lynch pin on which my resolve resides. If we find nothing more than an old bottle of cough syrup, the Iraqi's will not have to live in constant fear.
I have an answer for all those who would criticise this war for the civillian casuaties it is causing. Given the choice, what would you choose? Life under tyranny, or the chance to live as free men. The Iraqis lived under such a repressive regime that they could not act for themselves. Think about it...
"What would you do without freedom?"

Any man can withstand adversity...The true test of character is to give a man power <i>Abraham Lincoln</i>

Reply to Grub

Too true Grub. Unfortunately there are some who believe that that isn't enough. There has to be a 'smoking gun' to justify our actions.

Sad really.

<b><font color=blue>~ <A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=324&s=58e94ba84a16bedfebbf0f416d5bac48" target="_new">System Specs</A> ~<font color=blue></b> :wink:

Reply to camieabz

And once we have that, then some of the dissenters will demand further justification for our actions. Mentioning no names.

<font color=blue>"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum" - Roddy Piper</font color=blue>

Reply to RobD

Well said!

....but then again....such is the price of freedom...

But the one remaining question...Political price....

If now WMD are not found, Bush will still face HARSH criticism from opponents.....

<font color=blue> Computer fans are really cooling fans for the user. When they run, the user is cool, but whenever they break, the user starts sweating!! </font color=blue>

Reply to Groveling_Wyrm

That was in 1988... great chance those WMD are completely useless now.

And there are enough idiots in Iraq that are wanting to fire some chemical weapons for Saddam... so it is starting to look like he doesn't have them. Because he's about to loose at the moment so his last chance top use them is as good as over.

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

The documentary last night had former members of his government (well, if you can call it that) state that he was devoloping them after the first gulf war. It also explained how the UN inspections team was hoodwinked every inch of the way. They'd set up interviews with low level staff at various plants etc, and all the while it went on, high ranking Iraqi army officers watched him and listened to his every word. So if he did reveal, he and his family would have been killed.

<font color=blue>"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum" - Roddy Piper</font color=blue>

Reply to RobD

Quote :

That was in 1988... great chance those WMD are completely useless now.

And there are enough idiots in Iraq that are wanting to fire some chemical weapons for Saddam... so it is starting to look like he doesn't have them. Because he's about to loose at the moment so his last chance top use them is as good as over.



Why do you keep posting stuff like this? Now you say they haven't made any chemical weapons since 1988 (source?), and that the war is as good as over. It wasn't more than a few days ago that you were still ranting about urban warfare and the 6:1 ratio to take Baghdad and how the US is in big trouble. What's your deal anyways? What idiots want to use chemical weapons (source?).

<font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Really. Who are the idiots? For all we know, Saddam is the only person that's ever wanted to fire them, and the people that actually did the dirty work only did it so that they wouldn't be executed.
Of course, I guess I should probably include his sons. From all accounts, they're more f*cked up than their father.

War Eagle<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Auburn9698 on 04/08/03 03:43 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

Reply to Auburn9698

Double post<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Auburn9698 on 04/08/03 03:43 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

Reply to Auburn9698

definately... i think most of the MALE members of the hussein family probably deserves to be hung for various atrocities.

I feel sorry for all the wives and young children having to love with such phsycotic monsters.

<b>Americans generally do the right thing, after first exhausting all the available alternatives - Winston Churchill</b>
<A HREF="http://members.iinet.net.au/~lhgpoobaa/images" target="_new">My Images!</A>

Reply to lhgpoobaa

definately... i think most of the MALE members of the hussein family probably deserves to be hung for various atrocities.

I feel sorry for all the wives and young children having to live with such phsycotic monsters.

<b>Americans generally do the right thing, after first exhausting all the available alternatives - Winston Churchill</b>
<A HREF="http://members.iinet.net.au/~lhgpoobaa/images" target="_new">My Images!</A>

Reply to lhgpoobaa

Can you give me a source that Iraq produced WMD after 1992? No...? Well then we can assume he didn't made any.
As for which idiots would be willing to use WMD... there are enough members of the Baath party that will loos everything when Saddam goes... so they will be willing to do anything to prevent that from happening.

As for the current situation: I must say I'm kinda surprised with the speed it is going... all resistance seems to have vanished in thin air. Now lets hope it doesn't reappear suddenly.

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

HEHE, I'd like to pair Saddam up with an American wife and see how long he lasts.

War Eagle

Reply to Auburn9698

Yeah, so far you've been wrong about everything. The cheering in the streets, the rapid progress, the casualties, the fall of baghdad, etc

Nonetheless, even I am surprised at how quickly things are advancing, but the war is still not over.

<A HREF="http://www.efreedomnews.com/News Archive/Iraq/SpecialReportWaronIraq/M17_IraqWMD.htm" target="_new">Here's a link for you</A>

<font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

The cheering in the streets in Bagdad surprised me... but there wasn't much cheering in other parts of the country was there?
The rapid progress... LOL it isn't over yet and already took more then the 1 or 2 weeks you guys where thinking.
The casulties on Iraqi side are huge.
The fall of Bagdad also surprised me... looks like all defence vanished. Or maybe it was moved towards Tikrit?

And how do I know that link is propeganda? There is not much real proof in it... a lot of asumptions and rumours. And about Saddam being able to cunstruct a nuke within months... every idiot can do that when he gets his hand on Plutonium or Uranium-235. And if he had so much WMD... why aren't they found? Why didn't he use them as last revenge?

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

You would complain about this war no matter what happened. Recognize it for what it is and you'll see it's an amazing feat. Iraqi casualties? Yeah, they fought those same forces you said would be hurting badly. Let's not forget your casualty figure of tens or hundreds of thousands of coalition soldiers.

He has/had the sympathy of the arab world and didn't want to ruin it or maybe he was killed in that last blast and wasn't able to make a last stand. All rumors suggest he was trying to flee or has fleed.

And any idiot can build a nuclear bomb? Huh?

As far as the rumors, ignore them, but at the very least look at the UNSCOM report dates. They are years beyond what you said. I only took two seconds on google to find something with a later date. Feel free to find something better. Either way you were wrong. Don't discount the fact that Iraq is the size of California either as far as the little treasure hunt you propose. It'll take a while.

<font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Quote :

And about Saddam being able to cunstruct a nuke within months... every idiot can do that when he gets his hand on Plutonium or Uranium-235.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! Oh my god, that's hysterical!!!!

War Eagle

Reply to Auburn9698

Why? Why are you always mocking. From crossing the border to the dismantling of Saddam's regime in 21 days is pretty awesome in my book. We could display Saddam's corpse on TV (which we wouldn't BTW) and you'd still play down the significance.

Just like in WWII when the allies expected fierce resistance in Berlin, they were suprised by what they did, or didn't encounter. The simple fact is that we were the superior force. Period. You'd turn tail and run too faced with what was coming.

Quote :

every idiot can do that when he gets his hand on Plutonium or Uranium-235


Oh please. You aren't serious. It's not a fuckinn' jigsaw puzzle, aged 5+!

<font color=blue>"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum" - Roddy Piper</font color=blue>

Reply to RobD

Quote :

And any idiot can build a nuclear bomb? Huh?


Yes... it is very simple. And you can find construiction plans everywhere on internet. You only need enough Uranium-235 (if you got 2 times 25 kg and press it together it will go boom automatically) and some protection against the radiation. Shall I draw a figure for you of a nuke that is simple to build with stuff you can buy in a DIY store (and ofcourse Uranium-235 and radio-active protecting suits which you will have to get somewhere else... Ali Quada Mailorder services sells it for good prices)?

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

I'm not happy till it is over... and untill you get Tigrit it wont. And there have been far to many casulties to call this a clean war... while the USA promised this to be one.

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

*sigh*

Svol, are you spouting off again? Do you REALLY believe that they would ACTUALLY show you EXACTLY how to build a nuke? OH! Ok then, keep believing...

<font color=blue> Computer fans are really cooling fans for the user. When they run, the user is cool, but whenever they break, the user starts sweating!! </font color=blue>

Reply to Groveling_Wyrm

Actually this has been a clean war. If it had not then we would have simply carpet bombed the region and killed them all.

<A HREF="http://forums.btvillarin.com/index.php?act=ST&f=41&t=324&s=58e94ba84a16bedfebbf0f416d5bac48" target="_new">I reckon all women should learn how to do an engine re-build so they can get the right to vote.</A>

Reply to Yahiko81

Any war can only be "cleaner" than another war that you're comparing it to, like comparing this one to WWII or something. As in "This war was much cleanER than World War II". There is no such thing as a war that is "clean" in and of itself. War is dirty and ugly by nature.

Wars may be becoming cleanER than they used to be, due to advances in military weaponry. But they will never be "clean." It's war, dude.
War Eagle<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Auburn9698 on 04/11/03 03:39 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

Reply to Auburn9698

Quote :

Yes... it is very simple. And you can find construiction plans everywhere on internet.


You are a moron. A complete and total moron. Building a nuclear bomb is NOT "very simple". YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

<A HREF="http://www.terrorismanswers.com/weapons/making.html" target="_new">http://www.terrorismanswers.com/weapons/making.html</A>

Quote :

I'm not happy till it is over... and untill you get Tigrit it wont. And there have been far to many casulties to call this a clean war... while the USA promised this to be one.


You are too naive or young or stupid to understand what a war is. People die. The loss of life in this war has been minimal.

<font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

You're a retard.

<A HREF="http://winn.com/bs/atombomb.html" target="_new">http://winn.com/bs/atombomb.html</A>

This page tells you how to build a nuclear bomb easy! The USA is tricking your mind! You can build one for $5000-$30000.

At least svol knows what he's talking about. Too many retards in this forum.

Reply to Figwit

That site's a joke. You're a dumbass.

Barking Spider(BS)? Great, a site named after a fart...

War Eagle<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Auburn9698 on 04/11/03 05:35 PM.</EM></FONT></P>

Reply to Auburn9698

Quote :

You only need enough Uranium-235 (if you got 2 times 25 kg and press it together it will go boom automatically)


No it won't. You'll get a relatively small explosion and a huge radioactive mess - one variant of a dirty bomb.

The "art" of building an atom bomb involves holding the critical mass together long enough for a fission chain reaction to take place. Simple enough in theory, but the engineering has to be spot on or the mass simply goes critical WITHOUT a chain reaction & tears itself apart (still with a decent bang but not in the nuke league).
I defy you to find a website with the necessary engineering details to do that.

And building a thermonuclear bomb is an order of magnitude of complication above that. A bit like going to your local garage and asking them to build you an F-15.

I'm not denying that the "how to" has been leaked in various forms, just that terrorists-r-us doesn't quite exist on the web yet.

- -
Luck is my middle name. Unfortunately, my first name is Bad.

Reply to mccoll1ns

So lets pretend that you can get all your components, including the uranium required. And the NBC suit. Yu're missing one very vital component that you won't be able to get your hands on. Conventional exposives. Thermal charges or mining explosives won't do. You need proper gear.

And do you know how to prep the <i>exact</i> amount to cause detonation? Know how to prep det cord? Where to place it to ensure you don't just cause a big bang? It's not like the movies where you just place a fuckload of C4 next to a building and up it goes. Do that and you'll just take the mortar off a wall and create a loud bang? Explosives experts train for months. British army LATA training teaches explosives techniques that take months to perfect.

And you think you can get this off the 'net? LMMFAO. Get real. Unless you are studying nuclear physics, you haven't got a chance in hell.

Oh, and then there's the very slight fact that every western government will be monitoring you're activities very closely, and, if by some minute chance you got all the ingredients to create such a weapon, by the time you took delivery you'd be lying face down on the floor with a double tap to the head. Because that's the fate that befits terrorists.

<font color=blue>"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass. And I'm all out of bubblegum" - Roddy Piper</font color=blue>

Reply to RobD

Thanks to RobD and McColl1ns for writing more when I didn't feel like it. If you think that B.S. website tells you enough to build a working nuke, you're way off base. It's only a somewhat accurate summary in the vaguest sense.
Building a nuke involves complex engineering and physics and controlling a process with multiple steps that happens in a VERY short period of time.

War Eagle

Reply to Auburn9698

Atomic Cafe is a good flick on the subject of atomic weapons.

I can't wait for Svol to respond in here. The way he wiggles his way around arguments this should be amusing.

Figwit is evil.

<font color=red>GOD</font color=red> <font color=blue>BLESS</font color=blue> <font color=red>AMERICA</font color=red>

Reply to dhlucke

Heh heh, really.

More on weapons testing positive for nerve agents, and an Iraqi military guy who says he knows where more chemical weapons are kept.
<A HREF="http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/12/sprj.irq.chemical/index.html" target="_new">http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/04/12/sprj.irq.chemical/index.html</A>

War Eagle

Reply to Auburn9698

I don't call a war woth tenthousadns of casulties at one side clean... but that all depends on how you see clean.

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

Do you actually know how a nuke works... do you actually know how simple they are to make? It all depends on which kind of nuke you want... do you want a mobile one or do you just built it inside a city and then let it go boom (I hope I don't have to tell that the latter is the easiest). Do you only see a nuke as a missle that can be fired acrose the world? Here is a drawing of the worlds most easiets to make nuke (it is almost the same design of the nuke used on Hiroshima): <A HREF="http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~svo/nuke.gif" target="_new">click</A>

Now let me explain how simple it works. As you can see in the drawing there are 2 parts of 25 kg Uranium-235. If you ever got nuclear physics at school you should know that the critical mass (amount of metal needed to start nuclear reaction by itself) of Uranium-235 is 50 kg. If you shoot the first part of uranium at the second part and hold it together for some seconds to make it explode by itself you got your own nuke which is strong enough to destroy a small city.

Now ofcourse this isn't as simple as it seems... but as I said a couple of posts before every idiot can build a nuke of he <b>gots</b> two parts of 25 kg Uranium-235 and enough radiation equipment. Now the biggest problem ofcourse is getting the uranium-235 which is very hard... but I already assumed the maker got it with this drawing. And the radiation problems are huge too. So if you instead of bs'ing read my posts thoroughly and researched then you would've came to the same conclusion as I that every idiot can build a nuke once it <b>gots</b> 50 kg of Uranium-235 and protective equipment.

If you still don't beleive me then I advise you to take some classes nuclear physics.

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

LOL... as shown in my drawing normal gunpowder and gravity are enough. As long as the total mass of the top projectile is 40kg it will be heavy enough to hold the parts together... and some concrete around the second part helps too.

And yes... you can actually find this on internet. Even Tom Ridge knows this.

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

Hey, svol, have a look at my perpetual motion machine, all you have to do is plug it in...

Apart from your idea of using concrete for containment (which would barely contain the initial mechanical impact), you're missing "a number" of key components which make the difference between a bomb and a fizzle. You can attempt to find out said "number" of components and what they are if you'd like a visit from the Dutch equivalent of MI5.



- -
Luck is my middle name. Unfortunately, my first name is Bad.

Reply to mccoll1ns

LOL

Anyway I agree that concrete isn't the best solution but it does the job (why do you think nuclear reactors also use concrete as protection?) as long as it it thick enough. And you can enforce the concrete by digging that part of the nuke in.

But if you take a look at the scematic work of Little Boy (you know... the nuke they used on Hiroshima) you will see that they look alike: <A HREF="http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~svo/nukelb.jpg" target="_new">click</A>

But which kind of key components am I missing except for the facilities to produce pure Uranium-235 and the radiation protection stuff? As I said the biggest pain in the ass is getting the Uranium-235... as soon as you got enough of that stuff building the nuke is 'a piece of cake'.

My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on :eek:

Reply to svol

You use concrete in reactor buildings for the same reason that you use concrete in any building. It's strong & cheap. You just use more of it, because it's a good alpha & gamma absorber.

You've got the basics, but if that was all it took to make an a-bomb then we WOULD be in trouble. As I said, all you've got there is a fizzle, and you might not even get that.

As to what's missing, you're on your own because:
a) I'm damn sure the stuff I've seen in the past (various sources) still wasn't the whole story.
b) I have no intention of setting off alarm bells in the NSA/GCHQ equivalent of Google.

- -
Luck is my middle name. Unfortunately, my first name is Bad.

Reply to mccoll1ns

I hate to say it guys but svol is correct. Once you have the enriched uranium/plutonium building a bomb isn't that difficult. In any event it certainly isn't beyond Iraq or even Iran, especially once you consider the pool of former Russian nuclear scientists that they can and have recruited (source: National Geographic from about a year ago). All the massive equipment and acres of buildings that you're thinking of aren't used to construct the bomb, they are used to purify the uranium. Once you have the purified uranium/plutonium the bomb itself isn't hard to build at all.

I'm not saying that any militia man or joe sixpack can do it, but it certainly isn't beyond the skills of your average nuclear physist university grad, or even undergrad. Also note that I'm not talking about a precision guided nuclear missle, or even about a suitcase bomb, but a good old-fashioned atom bomb that you could build on a boat or perhaps a large transport truck. It won't be nearly as powerful as modern bombs, but it'll do the job at least as good as Hyroshima.

The main problem is getting that enriched uranium. Add to that that the equipment needed to enrich the uranium requires vast expertise along with acres of realestate which will easilly show up in satalite photos.

--------------
Knowan likes you. Knowan is your friend. Knowan thinks you're great.

Reply to knowan
Previous
1 2 3
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Old Man/Woman's Club > Other > Chemical Weapons Found?
Go to:

There are 1108 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them