/ Sign-up
Your question

dreams of diablo 3

  • Diablo
  • Blizzard
  • Video Games
Last response: in PC Gaming
August 19, 2003 4:55:29 PM

i just got my pc gamer and on page 54 "news tickers" and i quote: " the founders of blizzard north ...have resigned from vivendi universal to pursue other opportunities. rumor has it that the group responsible for the diablo series wanted those other opportunities to not include the words diablo and III."

oh well i still have diablo 2.

More about : dreams diablo

August 19, 2003 4:59:02 PM

Those games are relatively boring by todays standards. Click click click. That was it. Oh and click click click.

Good for them.

<font color=red><b>your an idiot of biblical proportions
August 19, 2003 7:31:04 PM

At least you were doing SOMETHING... not like EQ... sit on ass for 16 hours while waiting for some random monster to spawn...

<font color=red> If you design software that is fool-proof, only a fool will want to use it. </font color=red>
Related resources
August 19, 2003 10:56:51 PM

Never played EQ. Why would you wait for one particular monster for a whole day?

<font color=red><b>your an idiot of biblical proportions
August 20, 2003 1:39:00 AM

EQ at that level is 90% social and 10% game. It's all about finding great people to make your 16 hours enjoyable. (And yes, you have to be a little crazy)

D3 wouldnt really have a place in today's game market. I think the whole genre has evolved past what Diablo created originally.
August 20, 2003 9:52:24 AM

Yeah, Diablo wasnt bad but far from great
BALDURS GATE 2, Best PC Fantasy RPG Ever! until BG3 (if ever)

<i>Mmm Dawn AND Eve at the same time...Drroooooll
<b>XP2100+, 1Gb RAM, ASUS A7N8X, PNY 64Mb Ti4200. :cool: