Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (
More info?)
"Quick" <quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1109719764.131723@sj-nntpcache-3...
> D.J. Osborn wrote:
>> "Quick" <quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1109714948.362936@sj-nntpcache-5...
>>> D.J. Osborn wrote:
>>>> "Quick" <quick7135-news@NOSPAMyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> <threeew@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> I have the last AC1 plan marketed in January where
>>>>>>> you get the $59.99 500 min family share plan for 2
>>>>>>> lines. If I add a line to this plan now, can it
>>>>>>> still be under the AC 1 PRL, or will Verizon add it
>>>>>>> as an AC 2 PRL. Worse yet, will they require all
>>>>>>> lines to be updated to the AC2 PRL if I add a new
>>>>>>> line?
>>>>>
>>>>> dr.wireMORE@VZW-MidWESTma wrote:
>>>>>> Did you ask VZW? No, huh. The new line would have to
>>>>>> be under the new promotion; to marry it to any of your
>>>>>> other lines will require them to give up the
>>>>>> grandfather. You may find someone willing to "pull"
>>>>>> the old codes; but the vanilla answer is yes: you WILL
>>>>>> have to move all the lines to AC2. Tell us if you get
>>>>>> lucky... dr
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, I think that's true. Also, since the AC1
>>>>> isn't offered any more, you can't move up or down in
>>>>> AC1 minutes either.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Various people over time have stated that VZW has plans
>>>> available that aren't listed on their Website. More
>>>> recently, some people have stated that VZW would
>>>> continue to have AC1 plans available (upon request) for
>>>> some time to come.
>>>>
>>>> Bottom line: We're all just speculating. The only way to
>>>> get the real answer is to contact VZW CS. Since it's a
>>>> known fact that different CS reps give different
>>>> answers, it's worth several tries until one gets the
>>>> answer one wants.
>>>
>>> I did. I'm wasn't speculating. You could have too in less
>>> time than it took to post. CS said the AC1 plan that I
>>> got on 1/6/05 is no longer offered.
>>
>> You didn't bother to read what I wrote, and you offered
>> *one* answer from *one* CS rep. Various reports here and
>> at
http://www.howardforums.com have stated that different
>> CS reps give different answers. Therefore, unless you
>> tried several of them, you don't have anything except on
>> answer that may--or may not be--correct!
>>
>> Next time, you'll appear less foolish if you bother to
>> actually read what others have written before responding!
>
> Oh. I'm sorry. I went back and actually read what you posted.
>
> "Various people over time have stated ..."
> "Bottom line: We're all just speculating."
> "Various reports here and ... have stated ..."
>
> I really feel foolish now,
You are obviously making a tongue-in-cheek statement, but the reality is
that you should feel foolish for making the claim that you made.
It's clear that various VZW CS reps give various answers, and that the
answer you received may or may not be the correct one. If you really think
that your *one* experience outweighs those of *many* others, then you
*really* should feel foolish!
--
D.J., N8DO; FMCA 147762
dj[underscore]osborn at yahoo dot com