BF3 again xD

I think the GPU is a little weak, but low should be ok. What resolution. It'll still look nice on low. You've tons of CPU power.

Hi  

I can never understand why people have a REALLY good processor and then add a crap graphics card for gaming.....

The other way round is much better for gaming....

To the OP ...low to medium at best in BF3...

All the best Brett  

because they get repeatedly shown benchmarks using the highest end GPU's and then told look see you need this CPU to get over 60FPS at ultra, if you dare point out that that CPU means they will be using a mummified hamster in a wheel as a GPU and ultra is the last thing they will get near you get shouted down.

meximexi if your at 1920X1080 low with some medium if you turn off all the AA and eye candies, or mostly medium if you can play at lower FPS

i was thinking to change the resoluccion to play with almost everything on medium or it will be better to play with that res in low settings?

i want to move fast and see things better than cod or console xD some people tell me in pc with low settings look pretty nice better than xboxs or ps3 but i dont know

what is AA? well i can turn it off on the game menu? and the eye candies too?
AA and eye candies make any diference?

AA - antialiasing by eyecandies I mean other extra setings. The biggest performance hits for lower end cards on BF3 are AA and other extra settings usually turning them down or off lets you get more FPS..... basically run everything on medium if you think its not smooth enough then go in to the menu and turn some things down, keep doing that until you get a setting you like.

i'm running mostly on low on my gtx470, so that I maintain 60fps. and it still looks great.

2048x1152 (not that much bigger than 1080p)
you think a gtx470 should do better than that? mostly low, textures high, about 90% gpu utilisation, 50-60% cpu util. gpu temp 78-80. V-synch on and i'm between 55 and 60, some maps locked at 60.

From memory if I go higher its still smooth, but drops down to 45fps.

it seemed to help some of my shockingly poor aiming  

someone tell me when i get the game im going to download like 6 gb of new *** like CQ pacc or something but , its free no? anyways i have to do a account in origin?

gtx470 is better tha amd hd 6570?

If it updates like it does on consoles you will basicly download the content in a large update, but you have to buy the pack (B2K , CQ and soon AK) to be able to play the new maps, but again that's if it updates like it does on console. And yes you do need a orgin account to play and use battlelog.

much much much better, this comparison is with a 6670.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/613?vs=519

ohh i see damn, well monkey u think the amd hd 6570 will work for medium setting maybe some in high? in a resoluccion of 1200x1000 +-??? i think 35 fps is enough to play xP

nope. your looking at low settings across the board. and you still will be under 60 fps most of the time. 30 is playable but you are gonna get had by guys who get 60+ just because there systems are updating faster than yours. by as much as 2 times... better to save up and get something like a 6850 or better to run low settings and get 60 fps minimum... its better to run low and have 60 than high on 45... you have a reasonably decent cpu so why not at least see what it can do by stretching its legs with a good gpu instead of hobbling it with that low end card.