Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5 - Opinions ?

Last response: in Networking
Share
April 8, 2004 1:55:13 AM

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

How would you rate Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5? Good/Bad/Comments
etc. apprecciated....

David W
Anonymous
a b 8 Security
April 8, 2004 5:30:16 PM

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

"David" <Researcher01@ComcastNOMAIL.Net> wrote in message
news:HbidnWk49ryeLOndRVn-hA@comcast.com...
> How would you rate Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5? Good/Bad/Comments
> etc. apprecciated....
>
> David W
>
>
Pretty good but I wouldn't relay only on Sygate to secure my system.
April 8, 2004 5:30:17 PM

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

What would be your suggestion for additional security?
"IcemanĀ©" <iceman@cool.net> wrote in message
news:c52gvj$2o5n4b$1@ID-132761.news.uni-berlin.de...
>
> "David" <Researcher01@ComcastNOMAIL.Net> wrote in message
> news:HbidnWk49ryeLOndRVn-hA@comcast.com...
> > How would you rate Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5? Good/Bad/Comments
> > etc. apprecciated....
> >
> > David W
> >
> >
> Pretty good but I wouldn't relay only on Sygate to secure my system.
>
>
Related resources
Anonymous
a b 8 Security
April 8, 2004 5:30:18 PM

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

"David" <Researcher01@ComcastNOMAIL.Net> wrote in
news:n5SdnQ6wK6MfT-ndRVn_iw@comcast.com:

> What would be your suggestion for additional security?
> "IcemanĀ©" <iceman@cool.net> wrote in message
> news:c52gvj$2o5n4b$1@ID-132761.news.uni-berlin.de...
>>
>> "David" <Researcher01@ComcastNOMAIL.Net> wrote in message
>> news:HbidnWk49ryeLOndRVn-hA@comcast.com...
>> > How would you rate Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5?
>> > Good/Bad/Comments etc. apprecciated....
>> >
>> > David W
>> >
>> >
>> Pretty good but I wouldn't relay only on Sygate to secure my system.
>>
>>
>
>

http://www.petri.co.il/block_ping_traffic_with_ipsec.ht...
http://www.analogx.com/contents/articles/ipsec.htm

If you have the O/S, then you can use it to supplement a router or host
based FW on the machine.

From a link I read and can be applied even on the PC as far as I am
concerned -- layered defense.

<snip>

Configure IPSec Policy

You should seriously consider setting an Internet Protocol Security (IPSec)
packet-filtering policy on every Web server. This policy provides an extra
level of security if your firewalls are breached. Multiple levels of
security technology are often considered a good practice.

In general, you should block all TCP/IP protocols other than those you
explicitly want to support and the ports you want to open. You can use the
IPSec administration tool or the IPSecPol command line tool to deploy IPSec
policy.

<Snip>

http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm
http://www.snapfiles.com/get/hoststoggle.html

If you have one that can be harden, then harden the O/S.

http://www.uksecurityonline.com/index5.php

Of course, you could put it behing a NAT router that cost as much as Sygate
is not a bad option either, even for a single machine.

http://www.homenethelp.com/web/explain/about-NAT.asp

Duane :) 
Anonymous
a b 8 Security
April 8, 2004 6:13:51 PM

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

SPF is the best at providing you with complete details for any
installed application trying to access the Internet, as well as the IP
address that is being accessed. For example, with Eudora's email
utility you can select to install the ad version for free and SPF pro
will actually inform you when Eudora is trying to access your pop
server to retrieve your mail and also separately when trying Eudora is
trying to access Eudora's ad server (which you can actually block with
eventual consequences). Most other firewalls will only ask you once if
you want to allow an application to have access to the Internet.

As for protection from external threats, SPF along with a hardware
firewall and some other protection tweaks/tools (e.g., www.grc.com,
Ad-aware's adwatch) is the best bet.

> How would you rate Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5? Good/Bad/Comments
> etc. apprecciated....
Anonymous
a b 8 Security
April 8, 2004 11:12:09 PM

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

In article <HbidnWk49ryeLOndRVn-hA@comcast.com>, Researcher01@ComcastNOMAIL.Net says...
> How would you rate Sygate Personal Firewall Pro' 5.5? Good/Bad/Comments
> etc. apprecciated....
>
> David W
>
Hi David. Sygate is the only firewall I've run on my computer so I
can't compare. ( I installed Kerio 215 once just to see what it looked
like) I have run several versions of free Sygate. I now have v5.5 pro.
Sygate has served me well and has been trouble free. I rate it "excellent".
Easy to set up the Application Rules. Takes some knowledge of ports,
IPs, and protocols to set up the Advanced Rules. It has good,
easy to read logging. It logs all connection (and attempted conections)
in/out to internet. Has stateful packet inspection (SPI). Take a
look at the comparison of free vs pro to see all the features(listed
below).
R

Unofficial Help:
http://bellsouthpwp.net/i/k/ikpe/SygateBasics.html
(This site has two parts: Sygate Basics and Sygate Basics
Part 2. Click on the button to toggle between the two)

Sygate Forums:
http://forums.sygate.com/vb/

Users Guide and Quick Start Guide:
http://smb.sygate.com/support/documents/pspf/default.ht...

Compare SPF Pro and SPF (See what's inside each one)
http://smb.sygate.com/products/spf/comparison_spf.htm

d/l
http://soho.sygate.com/free/default.php
http://www.tucows.com/preview/213160.html
!