Kerio 2.1.5 or Kerio 4.x ?

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Is there any interest to replace a Kerio 2.1.5 (which seems to do a
very good job...) by the latest 4.xx ?

--
Laurent GRENET

 

[bill]

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

I did it and frankly didnt see any improvements. Should have stuck with the
2.x. If you pay for 4.x you get some extras like blocking pop ups etc.

Bill
"Laurent" <Laurent.Grenet.Enlevez-Ca@Voila.fr> wrote in message
news:mesnews.4cd77d44.fcc1b479.402.2067@Voila.fr...
> Is there any interest to replace a Kerio 2.1.5 (which seems to do a
> very good job...) by the latest 4.xx ?
>
> --
> Laurent GRENET
>

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: comp.security.firewalls (More info?)

Laurent wrote:
> Is there any interest to replace a Kerio 2.1.5 (which seems to do a very
> good job...) by the latest 4.xx ?
>

I've tried both and I like both of them. The main thing I dislike about
4.xx is it's lack of logging. You can't see what's happening. So for
that reason I usually stick with 2.1.5, which is also a little more
straight forward. However, I haven't seen any bugs in 4.xx recently, so
it seems to do the job also.

All in all, I slighly prefer 2.1.5 I guess. If 4.xx had logging of
packets to unopened ports, I'd probaby use it.