Still... missing... EQ...

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

And what's more, it seems like Sony have largely, if not completely,
fixed SK-tanking balance.

....6 months after I quit... BASTARDS

And it is a pity that *everyone* I used to play with has moved to EQ2 or
WoW

cheers,
James (returns to the lurker-nest)

Kuloth 70 Shadowknight, Povar [Guild Defunct]

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

James Hicks <james@doesntlikespam.org> wrote in news:iaqce.33309$5F3.17237
@news-server.bigpond.net.au:

> And what's more, it seems like Sony have largely, if not completely,
> fixed SK-tanking balance.
>
> ...6 months after I quit... BASTARDS
>
> And it is a pity that *everyone* I used to play with has moved to EQ2 or
> WoW
>
> cheers,
> James (returns to the lurker-nest)
>
> Kuloth 70 Shadowknight, Povar [Guild Defunct]
>
>

I just recently canned EQ2 and went back to EQLive. I moved all my original
mid-level alts to Stromm. It does seem to be a lively place for all levels.

Btw, what is this SK-tanking balance to which you refer? How did they go
about that?

--
Rumble
"Write something worth reading, or do something worth writing."
-- Benjamin Franklin

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

<Rumbledor@hotspamsuxmail.com> wrote:
> James Hicks <james@doesntlikespam.org> wrote in news:iaqce.33309$5F3.17237
> @news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>
> > And what's more, it seems like Sony have largely, if not completely,
> > fixed SK-tanking balance.
> >
> > ...6 months after I quit... BASTARDS
> >
> > And it is a pity that *everyone* I used to play with has moved to EQ2 or
> > WoW
> >
> > cheers,
> > James (returns to the lurker-nest)
> >
> > Kuloth 70 Shadowknight, Povar [Guild Defunct]
> >
> >
>
> I just recently canned EQ2 and went back to EQLive. I moved all my original
> mid-level alts to Stromm. It does seem to be a lively place for all levels.
>
> Btw, what is this SK-tanking balance to which you refer? How did they go
> about that?

They kept doing nothing until the SKs realized that they actually tanked
just fine. =P

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (More info?)

Faned <faned@wyld.qx.net> wrote in
news:slrnd74k4i.ou0.faned@wyld.qx.net:

> <Rumbledor@hotspamsuxmail.com> wrote:
>> James Hicks <james@doesntlikespam.org> wrote in
>> news:iaqce.33309$5F3.17237 @news-server.bigpond.net.au:
>>
>> > And what's more, it seems like Sony have largely, if not
>> > completely, fixed SK-tanking balance.
>> >
>> > ...6 months after I quit... BASTARDS
>> >
>> > And it is a pity that *everyone* I used to play with has moved to
>> > EQ2 or WoW
>> >
>> > cheers,
>> > James (returns to the lurker-nest)
>> >
>> > Kuloth 70 Shadowknight, Povar [Guild Defunct]
>> >
>> >
>>
>> I just recently canned EQ2 and went back to EQLive. I moved all my
>> original mid-level alts to Stromm. It does seem to be a lively place
>> for all levels.
>>
>> Btw, what is this SK-tanking balance to which you refer? How did they
>> go about that?
>
> They kept doing nothing until the SKs realized that they actually
> tanked just fine. =P
>

Lol, pretty much true.

We routinely use SKs and Paladins as tanks for anything but the toughest
mobs on raids, have done so for a long time now.

They did give them the useless mini-defensive. Was there something else?

--
On Erollisi Marr in <Sanctuary of Marr>
Ancient Graeme Faelban, Barbarian Soothsayer of 70 seasons

On Steamfont in <Insanity Plea>
Graeme, 28 Dwarven Mystic, 24 Sage, Retired
Aviv, 15 Gnome Brawler, 30 Provisioner, Retired