Archived from groups: alt.games.everquest (
More info?)
In article <Xns965480DB9D3D6Rumbledorhotmailcom@63.240.76.16>,
Rumbledor@hotspamsuxmail.com says...
> 42 <nospam@nospam.com> wrote in
> news:MPG.1ced2f94ca74599c989b29@shawnews:
>
> > In article <Xns965471983BD4ERumbledorhotmailcom@63.240.76.16>,
> > Rumbledor@hotspamsuxmail.com says...
> >>
> >> If I understand it correctly (couldn't verify it myself, as my custom
> >> UI's were all borked from the update) the price is shown in the item
> >> listing without having to right-click on the item. If that's the
> >> case, then I agree that, for spells specifically, level would be much
> >> more helpful. When I hit a new spell level (which will evidently be
> >> most every level now), I make sure I have plenty of plat to buy them
> >> and then sift through all the spell vendors looking for those that
> >> are of my level. Listing the level would make that process much
> >> simpler and less time consuming, the listing the names certainly
> >> helps as well.
> >
> > /shrug then you'll be wanting the class listed too... every level has
> > spells that have to be bought from unusual multi-class vendors (in
> > FV/Iceclad/Shadowhaven/EchoCaverns/Katta Kastellum/HHK etc...
>
> Sure, now that you mention it.
Heh. I walked into that one
If you liked that, see /vender below
>
> > Everyone I know figures out what they need -first- and where they are
> > located and then goes and gets them. Its terribly inefficient not to
> > mention inadequate to wander around PoK clicking and sifting. It would
> > take forever, and you'd still miss some.
>
>
> As do I. However, I end up having to check them off individually as I
> purchase them. It would be nice to merely note that I'm needing six new
> spells and see that there are six spells for my level all together,
> purchasing them all at once. I could then verify them all at once as well,
> ensuring that I have all I was expecting and none are missing due to list
> discrepancies.
As long as the spells are scattered on different vendors it will never
be that easy. Personally, I think it shouldn't be that easy.
> Also, I don't wander around PoK clicking and sifting.
It is a pretty funny visual though. =)
> Naturally I begin
> with my class spell merchants and work from there. A cleric, for example,
> has a pretty good idea what other class spell merchants to check for his
> lower level healing spells (why they can't all be found on cleric spell
> merchants, I'll never know).
>
> My point was that while it would be nice, it's not exactly necessary.
Fair enough. It would also be nice for food items to list their grade
(miraculous, whistle wetter, etc and stats) or for the lists to be
filterable/searchable so that I only see 'food & drink' or 'weapons and
armour' or 'mage spell research items'... or 'cleric spells between
level 24 and 29' etc etc etc
Or perhaps we should be able to pull up /vendor in any zone, see what
all the NPCs are selling in a nice /bazaar interface window, right click
on the item, click Find Vendor and follow the glowy over to him...
Not sure that would be good for the 'game' though. But still...but it
would make shopping "easier".
I mean there's lots of things we could fine tune to make it 'perfect'
(each of us having their own list of preferences, but the OP gave it a
thumbs down primarily because it didn't list spell level... 99% of my
vendor purchases aren't for spells. Several classes in the game don't
even use spells. And last but not least the -old- system didn't
conveniently display spell levels either so its not like we lost
something.
It seems a very petty thing to trash the whole system over.