I was thinking last night and I came across an idea. The basic model for computers is based off the human brain, which is the fastest computer in existance. If we had the perfect machine, with every component as fast as it could go the bottlenecks of the design would be apparent. The slowest things to be accessed are the hard drive and memory. How will this be fixed? Just like in the human brain the memory is all stored right where it is processed, in patterns of neural connections. The answer is to enlarge the cpu cache! So simple yet so hard to achieve with todays manufacturing proceses. Think about it tho, we already have compact flash cards up to 4gb and those chips are tiny! SD cards up to 1gb are due out anytime and they are the size of freaking stamps! Soon we may be installing windows onto our cpus, mark my words! Of course this will not happen for quite some time thanks to the nature of capitolism, so many companies would lose money if we didn't need hard drives anymore. And the cpu caches would have to be flash ram so that the data could survive a reset... Ten years is my prediction! BTW this idea is now patent pending any use of it without my explicit consent is forbidden!
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
*Flame walks up to Papasmurf and kicks him in the ass*
Hilbert space is a big place.
You're going to store your OS on your CPU, huh? Interesting.......
<font color=red>Breaking News:</font color=red> God expelled from Netherlands; not good enough. Details to come.
War Eagle
For this uber memory access, you better pray to the scientists who work w/ quantum comps to make it that way cause if we can engineer actual parallel long term memory...well.....it'll be fast to say the least since we'll be able to access and manipulate it all in 1 operation. I think that beats the neural network
Heheh, on a sidenote, we were analyzing the poem The Path Not Taken which is about 2 roads, symbolic of the possible paths u can take in life and the author chooses the one least trodden, however there's always a sense of what if I took the other road. Certainly not pissed off that he took the one he took as it made all the difference in the world and there are no negative connotations to it, but none the less that is that natural regret of not having taken the other option. Obviously he has gone too far in life to come back now as there are so many other choices he had to make. ANYWAY, I barely kept from blurting out that it was all futile since I can take both roads at once with quantum
There, how u like dat analysis? Took 1 minute.
Hilbert space is a big place.
Two roads diverged in a yellow wood,
And sorry I could not travel both
And be one traveler, long I stood
And looked down one as far as I could
To where it bent in the undergrowth;
Then took the other, as just as fair,
And having perhaps the better claim,
Because it was grassy and wanted wear;
Though as for that the passing there
Had worn them really about the same,
And both that morning equally lay
In leaves no step had trodden black.
Oh, I kept the first for another day!
Yet knowing how way leads on to way,
I doubted if I should ever come back.
I shall be telling this with a sigh
Somewhere ages and ages hence:
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I-
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
I have it memorized
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
Hmm, you know the poem I Become a Transparent Eyeball?
Hilbert space is a big place.
I've heard it, something about being a particle of God...
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
ohhh God my ass! Damnit that hurts! Naw I just have had no caffine today, I need to go down to the store and buy some. Not thinking very clearly I guess. But it's still a good idea! Well at least till I drink my rockstar... Ever read a term paper you wrote in the wee hours of the night? They are so funny!
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
Yep, done that plenty of times hehe. get all poetic only to find the next morning it makes no sense and the grammar alone will give u an F
Hilbert space is a big place.
lol I'm too damned lazy I always do them the night before they are due. My professors (don't they wish they had their professorates!) always laugh at me for it too.
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
*Splash of water* Welcome back to 2003 AD
<b><font color=blue>Jr. Executives play soccer, mid management play tennis and top management prefer golf.Moral of the story - As u go up the ladder your balls shrink.</b></font color=blue><font color=red><b><i>Jay Kay</font color=red></b></i>
There are a couple of problems though:
1. even 512kb cache takes up about 1/2 of the die of a CPU... you want to have a die that is 1 square meter?
2. Cache, flash and DRAM are totally different things.
3. You can't store anything permenantly in cache.
4. The construction of large cache is very expensive beause it takes up a lot of waffer space.
5. Memory bottlenecks aren't very big nowadays... the biggest bottleneck is still the HD though.
6. Fast running cache memory creates lots of heat.
But an integration of fast flash (flash memory isn't very fast) into some kind of HD would make the bottleneck much smaller... but putting that all on one CPU die will get very expensive and difficult.
My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on
it would be difficult hell impossible to do NOW but I'm not talking about now. a die of 3 sq meters? I think not. As I said flash ram would have to be used so that the data survived a reset. The only reason I posted this was because I was drunk of tiredness. I was just stating where I thought we would be in a few years is all.
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
2003ad you say, [-peep-] the time machine malfucntioned uh I gotta go
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
take me with youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu! *throws a wrench into the time machine*
Damn, svol came and got all technical on our asses lol.
Hilbert space is a big place.<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by flamethrower205 on 05/04/03 10:27 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Dont you [-peep-] touch the time machine i'm going to have a patent on that thing
<font color=blue>Jr. Executives play soccer, mid management play tennis and top management prefer golf.Moral of the story - As u go up the ladder your balls shrink.</font color=blue><font color=red><b><i>Jay Kay</font color=red></b></i>
I patented it back before the dinosaurs I out tricked you all ahaha
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
joke's on u, it just blew up cause of that wrench! Yeah, it got stuck in the uranium-lithium hydroxide time ventrical unit and left a crater where the machine is. There won't be another time machine for eternity! ahahahahahaha.
Hilbert space is a big place.
There's a number of problems with that.
Cache is like a desk drawer. The stuff you use a lot is kept there. Ram is like a filing cabinet next to your desk, and the HD is the library. Now, if you could fit the entire library in your desk drawer, sure you could get stuff faster than going to the library, but it'd still take way longer to search through a million books in your drawer than to pull 1 out of 2 pieces of paper from it.
The way of the future IMO is MRAM (magnetic ram). It retains it's info even after a reboot, so you can load up on 5 gigs of the stuff, load your OS onto it, and just run everything from there.
Some day I'll be rich and famous for inventing a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
<A HREF="http://vadim.www.media.mit.edu/MAS862/Project.html" target="_new">This</A> guy puts it all in perspective.
Dichromatic for your viewing plesure...
How does the Human brain store data was the question I asked when I read the first post? With electrical impulses. Each memory = electrical impulses. correct? Well lets put that into perspctive. NO hardware (ie. Hard drive of any kind) Correct? Well I was thinking maybe in the future we will start building computers more like the human brain. IE. A hard drive will not necessarily be a drive any more but merely a MASS of electricity. Think of it, Instead of opening your case and finding a hard drive but opening your case and seeing just a ball of electrical energy. Hmm? I guess that gets rid of all those damned cracked plates and crashes huh?
If im wrong well then Im wrong.
-=[ I was walking through the forest the other day and a tree fell behind me. I didn't hear a thing... Does that answer your question? ]=-
it's a good thing I know where The time machine will be in 30 years, I can just steal it from myself.
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
Well actually Human Brain /nervous system uses electrical impulses to send/recieve nervous signals not for storing them. How infortmation is stored in the human brain in the memory cells is still unknown and highly debatable.
<font color=blue>Jr. Executives play soccer, mid management play tennis and top management prefer golf.Moral of the story - As u go up the ladder your balls shrink.</font color=blue><font color=red><b><i>Jay Kay</font color=red></b></i>
well then im wrong...
just trying to think out of the box....
only if i could get tha mutha phuka open....
dam the lids stuck...
oh well next time.
-=[ I was walking through the forest the other day and a tree fell behind me. I didn't hear a thing... Does that answer your question? ]=-
Actually, there are other technologies which will be replacing the "transistor".
The problem with current transistor technology is that we are now limited by the size of the atom - it's too big! Just like when you run your processor you get electron migration (because that extra bit of juice gives the electrons enough boost to jump to another atom), hard drives and ram are also limited. If I recall correctly, the best current technology has done is get about 800 atoms to polarize to create one bit of data on a hard drive's surface. Any fewer, and the atoms cannot retain their orientation and the memory becomes volatile (not good for a hard drive). With ram, the data pathways are becoming so narrow that the magnetic fields the generate are interfering with neighbouring pathways. Also not good.
I've done some research in the past, and there are two primary roads that can be taken. The first, which has been around for quite some time, is holographic technology. It uses two or more intersecting lazer beams in a crystalline medium to change the reflective properties at the intersection, and change that small area to a data "signature", not just one bit. The advantages are not only truly 3d-recording surfaces, or multiple bit-patterns at the same point in space, based on which lazers changed the point, but that this technology is EMP-proof (which is why it's been used for the military for quite some time now). But, all this is only the storage of the data. The technology to be using light to actually do the computer processing in true parallel is starting. What it means is that your computer will no longer be a big box of transistors, but just a ball of light (well, not literally).
The other is using bio-mechanical engineering. There is research for various applications here. Nano technology (see: Star Trek [Borg], seriously, it's the same idea!), for one, is emerging very swiftly. The other is to make computers that run on the exact same interface as the human body - using chemical interaction to transmit data throughout the system. I've spoken with the Dean of Electrical and Computer Engineering at my university (University of Manitoba), and he says he's been working on this, among other things. He's also been working on error correction (he's up to 40% loss-recovery, ie: lose 40% of data and successfully recover it through ECC, same idea that CDs and DVDs work on, which is why you can scratch them and they usually still work, until you gouge the crap out of it).
So, go search in google and read up on it. Right now I'm too lazy to do it for you ;-)
2500+ Barton 191x12@1.85v=2293mhz
Tr SLK-800
Tt Smartfan II
A7N8X Dlx
2x512MB Corsair PC3200
BBA 9700 Pro AIW
2x80GB 7200RPM Maxtor
Guillemot Game Theatre XP
I will have to look into that becuz I had thought about stuff like that(ball of energy = data storage) for a whiule but thought it was to "sci-fi"(for the lack of a better term. Thank you for the insight.
-=[ I was walking through the forest the other day and a tree fell behind me. I didn't hear a thing... Does that answer your question? ]=-
I wonder if it ever gets profitable... cache memory always have been very expensive to create and is only increasing very slowly during years. In 2000 the default was mostly 256 KB (although the first P3 has 512KB), now we're slowly moving towards 1 MB end 2003, beginning 2004.
And if cache speed stays increasing with CPU speed then the heat problem will always remain.
Unless we find a total new way of memory... like magnetic RAM or quantum computing. But I think you're right that the HD is going to be replaced with something else (probably without moving parts) somewhere in the future.
My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on
| Quote :
|
That's been talked about since the mid eighties. It could be used for storage, and even for RAM, but never for CPU's. The problem is that CPU keep advancing so fast that it leaves the primitave first attempts at using optical CPU's in the dust. Plus there's the medium. Last I heard your CPU would need to be made of diamond. If you think CPUs are expensive now, just wait until you have to use a diamond.
On the other hand there's quite a bit of interest from the space agencies. Light is immune to EM radiation, and virtually immune to temperature differentials. So in theory an optical CPU could travel into space with no shielding whatsoever. No shielding means less weight. Less weight means less expensive launches.
Probem is that they're so expensive to build.
| Quote :
|
While nanotech is very interesting, once again it won't make a CPU. It'll make major advances in the medical, manufacturing, mining and robotics fields, and may allow the mining of space and the terriforming of planets, but nanotech is just too darn big and slow for CPU's.
Now using nanotech to manufacture CPU's is interesting. Basically you grow cpu's and they self assemble themselves. Only problem is that ot present the process is only 95% efficient. Current foundries have to be 99.9999% efficient. With close to 100 million transistors, what are the chances of all 100 million working when you only have a 95% chance each transistor to produce a proper one?
| Quote :
|
Although there's been some reasearch into this, notably by IBM, it's probably a dead end. Chemical reactions are just too darn slow. Electricity and light travel at or near light speed. In comparison chemical interactions are so slow it's like they're standing still.
The future of CPU's is quantum. IBM is pouring massive amounts of moolah into quantum computers. Quantum computers would be incredibally fast. Using quantum mechanics effect could litterally preceed cause (aka you have the answer before you ask the question, or you feel the pain before you sit on the tack. I kid you not, this is possible with quantum mechanics). Also distance is no obstical. Sending results from here to the end of the room takes just as long as it does to send it from here to the end of the universe. Imagine the distributed computing possibilities!
Only problem is that quantum mechanics are inherantly unstable. Even the best quantum computer will be wrong 20% of the time. Error correction would concievably take up more cycles than the actual processing.
--------------
Knowan likes you. Knowan is your friend.
I have caused a time rift that has destroyed its existence permanently, at all times! Ahahahahaha, bow down to my powa!
Hilbert space is a big place.
the first p3s cache was off die so it was cheaper to make but slower to access.
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
but then you must deal with the issues of temporal paradox. If you destroyed its existance forever then how would you have been able to destroy its existance? It wouldn't have existed! SO a seperate dimenion would have to open with an alternate time line to compensate otherwise we'd be stuck in an infinate time loop.
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
So you think, but through doing nonlinear manipulations on my quantum computer I transcended these laws and do not obey such rules.
Hilbert space is a big place.
and in the end it was just a hoax and there was no real time machine. You will die from cancer because of that quantum computer at the ripe old age of 12 and 1/2.
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
This guy I was talking with at a science convention at albany had built a 2 bit quantum comp to do the cnot gate on a quantum comp, and the magnet used was so powerful if u stuck ur head in it, it'd mess up ur brain waves so u could taste colors and such. coooolll.....
Hilbert space is a big place.
DAMN!!! I just had me a stroke of genius! Instead of using super powerful magnets for quantum computers, just hook them up to some shrooms!
Some day I'll be rich and famous for inventing a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
"Sending results from here to the end of the room takes just as long as it does to send it from here to the end of the universe."
Not really no. You can't ever send information faster than light. Sure, you can entangle photons, bring one across the galaxy, do a computation with it, and have the other photon affected instantaneously, but that doesn't tell you anything. You have the answer sitting right there in front of you, but the d00d on the other side of the galaxy will still have to tell you what he did to his photon so you can figure out what your answer is (measuring it destroys the info)...
Some day I'll be rich and famous for inventing a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
HELL YA! where is this? I gotta try it!
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
Actually, given certain quantum black boxes and then that we establish a rule that all operations must be linear and the matrices for these operations unitary, actions can be traced back. We do run into the issue tho that if we wanna represent the specific position of the electron, it'd take infinite matter......
Hilbert space is a big place.<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by flamethrower205 on 05/05/03 11:20 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
I can hook u up, $100 a shot.
Hilbert space is a big place.
deal!
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
Point being you can give a little here and take a little there to get certain things, but as of now I can't send you an IM across the galaxy instantaneously...
Some day I'll be rich and famous for inventing a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
Yes that is true... most cache before the Coppermine core was of die. But it was still very expensive.
But if you only look to on-die cache you will also see that it doubles very slowly.
My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on
the reason modern cache is so expensive is that it must be able to run at the same speed as the cpu core, that takes an incredible amount of work.
Treat your body like a $600 car. God didn't intend it to last so use it. Run it into the ground!
right now u couldn't b/c we lack the technology for that level of quantum control. However, in later years, it'll be quite possible. Have u heard of the Bell states by any chance?
Hilbert space is a big place.
Exactly... otherwise cache will have a small bottleneck. So if you want to fully integrate memory into the CPU without bottlenecks you need to put it at symilair speed... which will always cost very much money. But ofcourse you can also use Level 3 Cache.
My dual-PSU PC is so powerfull that the neighbourhood dims when I turn it on
Well perhaps, but there's still the matter of getting the matter entangled. I don't think anyone has even tried thinking of a way to entangle particle pairs at a distance, so my radio and yours would have to come in contact initially. Then I jet off to Sirius. We could then communicate, but once we run out of entangled particles, we're fux0red. Also, it'd probably be faster for you to send me the message via regular radio then for me to fly out, entangle our radio transmitter/receivers, and then fly back...
But then again, they said the sound barrier could never be broken.
Some day I'll be rich and famous for inventing a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet.
I don't know if I'll live long enough to see quantum computers, but my grandkids will. Providing of course that the whole world doesn't go tits up before then.
I'm predicting the use of optics (light) as a storage meduim/RAM/Hard Drive within 10 years. They've been working on it since the eighties, we already have optical switches, and it's not a huge jump from a laser reading a CDRom to a laser reading a crystaline structure. The advantages are huge. A 3D substrate, immunity to EMI and virtual immunity to heat, plus concievably a read/write head that's only as large as a few wavelenghts of light. You could carry all the published works of mankind in the palm of your hand. You could carry the entire internet around in your pocket.
But IBM has been doing some wicked things with quantum physics. They've already teleported a molecule across a room. Here's a good laymans introduction <A HREF="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/teleport981022.html" target="_new">http://abcnews.go.com/sections/science/DailyNews/teleport981022.html</A>. The article is from 1999, there's been some advances since then, including the teleportation of physical objects. Here's an article from 2000 on IBM's first quantum computer: <A HREF="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/ibm000815.html" target="_new">http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/ibm000815.html</A>
What really scares me is the scenerio that it is only a quantum computer that could posses the complexity powerful enough to become self aware. It is possible that all quantum computers can be linked up together, in effect making all computers the same computer (that quantum thing again). This would be great for distributed computing, but hellish when you consider that a computer virus could simultaniously infect all computers.
Once things start getting this complex it's only a matter of time before this supercomputer becomes self aware. Then it's concievabe that quantum computers could supplant humans as the dominant life form within picoseconds. Imagine finding out that God really does exist, and that he's a monkey/housefly/single celled bacteria? What would your reaction be?
--------------
Knowan likes you. Knowan is your friend.
ok since all the quantum computer link but then if a virus attacked one computer the other quantum computers would be so fast that it would correct the other quantum computers before the virus had a change because the virus isnt fast enough. Unless somehow the virus was planned to attack all quantum computers at the exact same time and stopping them all.
As for the quantum computers being linked and thinking independly is scary cuz it could mean "<b>The Matrix has you!</b>" for all of us. And that alone is worrysome.
And for the bacteria is god thing is crap. I hope!
"I put a flowmaster on my Nvidia FX VIDEO CARD and reached a db score of 240db on Futuremark's DEAF METER 2003" Goto:
<A HREF="http://www.jab-tech.com" target="_new">http://www.jab-tech.com</A>
There are 1314 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

