Ad
News

Overclockers Push 8-core Skulltrail To 6 GHz: Dual-socket Overclocking Confirmed

Published on April 18, 2008

Las Vegas (NV) - When Intel released its Skulltrail platform , the main focus of this extreme computing platform was on overclocking capabilities. Now it has been pushed to 6 GHz by overclockers. Read more

Magazine for Overclockers Reaches Issue #2

Published on October 17, 2008

Issue #2 of the world's first magazine dedicated to overclocking and hardware news has just been released. Read more

Intel locks overclocking features

Published on June 19, 2004

Rumors, that Intel's new chipset 915/925 platforms do not offer much of a FSB overclocking margin, have been circulating for some time. As Tom's Hardware Guide was able to confirm, Intel went one step further: The chip giant adjusted its hardware to prevent any overclocking. Read more

Intel Nehalem To Allow Overclocking, Some Processors Will Even Encourage It

Published on June 06, 2008

Taipei (Taiwan) - Hot on the heels of AMD's overclocking secret , we can reveal that Bloomfield and Lynnfield, key processors of Intel's upcoming Nehalem family, will indeed feature overclocking capabilities for up to 16 CPU cores. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

The State Of The Personal Computer

Published on November 25, 2008

Where were we in 2008 and where are we heading in 2009? In his State of the Personal Computer address, Alan Dang shares his insights as a user of three different platforms: Mac, Windows, and Linux. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » Motherboards » Overclocking Ram??
 

Overclocking Ram??




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Overclocking Ram??
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Ok so I'm thinking of getting the $200 Gigabyte Board and putting in a 2.4c processor.
After a few months I am going to try and overclock it... but what about the ram? What speed Ram will I need and how much should I overclock the ram?

I really have no idea about overclocking ram, so feel free to educate me on the do's and do'nots.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

nothing special in overclocking ram, since it works in sync with your fsb, all you need to do is make sure that you've got ram to match you cpu (keeping it running as closely as possible to your cpu's fsb will allow for better performance). Basically, you can grab high-quality pc3200 ddr ram and truly overclock it, though you may be limited to what speed you will be able to run it at. on the other hand, if you get a high-speed rated module (such as pc3700), you are guaranteed to be able to run your ram up to 433mhz, thus an fsb of 866mhz, but in my opinion it takes the flavor out of overclocking, but its up to you.

as for setting the ram timings, its easy enough. if you allow it to run at "SPD" then it will run at 400mhz regardless of fsb speed, and at "CLK" it will run at the FSB's speed (well, the initial fsb x 2, as RAM does), which is when overclocking the fsb will be reflected upon the ram.. you can always push it a little more, running it at "CLK+33" (or 466Mhz based on a base-line 200mhz fsb, or a multiplied 800mhz cpu fsb), in which case increasing the fsb of the cpu would incread the ram speed, with an additional boost of 33mhz (x2).

<b>don't hold strong opinions about things you don't understand</b>

...<i><b><A HREF="http://home.graffiti.net/error_911:graffiti.net/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b></i>

Profile: Tom's Hardware Team
More Information

PC4000 would only get you up to 3GHz with the RAM running synchronously. Have you considered a 2.6C instead?

<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>

Profile: stranger
More Information

Error911 could you explain how to overclock Ram again?
PC3200 runs at 400 mhz right, so how high can it be overclocked?
PC3500 runs at 433mhz, how high can these things bee pushed?

Crashman, I dont understand why you recommend the 2.6c, whats so great about it? How high can it be pushed?

I just want to have the highest FSB attainable.(at a reasonable price)

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

PC3200 only runs 400 mhz effective, the real DRAM clock is 200 Mhz, hence the term double data rate, DDR.

Your CPU bus is quad data rate but also runs on a base clock of 200 Mhz (P4 C's do, that is).

When the bus and the memory are running at the same clock speed they are said to be running synchronously.

Since the multipliers are factory locked on P4s you can only overclock by raising the bus speed.

Starting with only PC3200 memory, any time you raise the memory clock above 200 Mhz then you are in fact overclocking the memory. To avoid this choose faster memory.

For example, if you use PC4000 memory you can overclock the bus from 200 Mhz up to 250 Mhz without overclocking the memory. Again this is assuming you continue to keep the memory in sync.

Now assuming you don't want to overclock the memory, only the processor, then this means your maximum bus clock is determined by the rated speed of your memory. In the case of PC4000, this would be 250 Mhz.

Why choose the P4 2.6c over a 2.4c?

The 2.4c has multiplier of 12x. 12 times 200 gives the processor its speed of 2400 Mhz. Meanwhile, the 2.6c has a multiplier of 13x.

Since your maximum bus speed (in this example) was determined to be 250 Mhz then the 2.4c can only be overclocked to 12 x 250 = 3000 Mhz. While the 2.6c can be overclocked to 13 x 250 = 3250.

Of course, if you do overclock the memory you can overclock the processor even higher.

Alternatively, you can run the memory asychronously (slower than bus speed). You might be able to overclock the processor higher but in turn you lose memory bandwidth.

<b>56K, slow and steady does not win the race on internet!</b><P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by phsstpok on 09/12/03 10:21 AM.</EM></FONT></P>

Profile: Forum Master
More Information

Do you need the Gigabyte Board for $200?

Profile: Forum Master
More Information

I bought IS7 $109 for my 2.4C OC to 3.0 stock Hsf HyperX PC3500 2 x 512

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

overclocking the RAM, like I said, is pretty simple...

basically, you have to understand that the two main settings you can use for your RAM is "SPD" (Serial Prescence Detection), which will basically set your RAM speed to 400Mhz (for PC3200), and then there's CLK, which will run your RAM at the CPU's FSB (which, in the case of a P4c, is 400Mhz non-overclocked). If you simply run your FSB higher, you will therefor overclock the RAM, its that simple. If you run an baseline FSB of 200Mhz (which translates to a CPU FSB of 800Mhz and a RAM speed of 400Mhz), then you're at stock. If you up it, you're overclocking the CPU and RAM (and chances are, unless you get RAM that has been guaranteed to overclock, such as PC3500 or PC4200 RAM, your RAM will the the OC bottleneck). You will also be able to set the ratio between CPU FSB and RAM speed, so for example if you have a CPU FSB of 250 (or 1000Mhz) and would only like to (or can only) run the RAM at 200Mhz (i.e. 400Mhz DDR), then you would allow for a ratio of 5:4 (CPU:RAM).

Cas Latency comes into play as well when overclocking, and thats why having RAM modules with low CL is good - more potential for overclocking. Lets say you've got some PC3200 at CL2.0, well chances are you can run that RAM at PC3500 at CL2.5, and maybe even high at CL3.0.

Also take into account voltages. Overclocker's RAM is typically set at 2.6V, while standard voltage is still considered to be 2.5V. If you manage to get a low voltage module, then you've got more room to up it (as most motherboard only allow a RAM voltage up to 2.7V, and most manufacturers void their warranty after 2.6V anyways). This too can help you get a few more Mhz of baseline FSB out of your RAM modules.

But no matter what kind of overclock you can get from them, I suggest you benchmark to see what is better for your system - asynchronous or synchronous CPU and memory speeds. Many believe that synchronous speeds (as in a baseline FSB of 200Mhz all around) allow for better performance, while others think that allowing the CPU to farly outclock the RAM will nonetheless give a performance boost. All I can say is try that out for yourself.

<b>don't hold strong opinions about things you don't understand</b>

...<i><b><A HREF="http://home.graffiti.net/error_911:graffiti.net/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b></i>


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » Motherboards » Overclocking Ram??

Go to:
 

Google Ads