9600 cheaper than 9500?

Titanion

Distinguished
Dec 8, 2002
1,489
5
19,295
Why is the 9600 cheaper than the 9500, even the black pcb nonpro cards? At new egg, I was seeing the 9600 for $122 and the black pcb for $139.

<font color=red><b>To reign is worth ambition though in Hell:
Better to reign in Hell, than serve in Heav'n.</b></font color=red>
John Milton, <i>Paradise Lost</i>, II 262-263
 

Kabome

Distinguished
Jul 3, 2003
61
0
18,630
The 9500 is actually better than the 9600, i forget the technical reasons at the moment but i do know that the 9600 was created as a more budget line card as opposed to the 9500 which is an older high end one, like the 9800 pro of the current day.
 

jmecor

Distinguished
Jul 7, 2003
2,332
0
19,780
but if you'll have to choose between a 9500 non-pro or a 9600 pro, 9600 pro is the way to go.

<b><font color=purple>
The real troubles in your life are apt to be things that never crossed your worried mind.
</font color=purple></b>
---
<A HREF="http://www.mapua.edu.ph/" target="_new">
MIT
</A>
 

ufo_warviper

Distinguished
Dec 30, 2001
3,033
0
20,780
The 9500 has the potential to being soft modded to 8 pixel pipelines where as the 9600 has only 4. Actually the 9500 has 4 on default and its a less thatn 50% chance of success softmodding a 9500.

The 9500 non-pro a little bit faster than the 9600 non-pro
The 9600 Pro is faster than the 9500 non-pro
The 9500 Pro is faster than a 9600 Pro.

But, the 9500 Pro & 9600 pro are <i>roughly</i> equal
The same situation applies for the non-pros in these series.

My OS features preemptive multitasking, a fully interactive command line, & support for 640K of RAM!