Archived from groups: alt.cellular.verizon (More info?
"Jimmy" <jimmyhasanaccountNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> On Wed, 25 May 2005 22:45:28 GMT, Jimmy
> <jimmyhasanaccountNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >From reading here it sounded like the 265 should be the better phone
> >for reception but it does not seem very good. Sound quality seems
> >lower than my old T720. Side to side comparisons with my daughter's
> >Samsung 670 (both new, just purchased) gives the Samsung the edge
> >by a large margin.
> >Thoughts? Did I just get a bad 265 ? Or is the 670 better?
> Just thought that perhaps I should be more specific than saying
> "reception". What happens is that the sound quality drifts up and
> down, sounds like the signal is blowing with the wind.
If you're talking sound quality, you may have gotten a bad phone based on my
experience with the V265. I can't answer about the A670, I considered that
phone but the lack of the analog band steered me to the V265. I find the
sound quality to be very clear and stable with both my wifes and my V265.
Transmission quality is also very clear and when I call my parents, my Dad
who is hard of hearing, has no difficulty in understanding me at all.