water vs air
Last response: in Overclocking
I have been researching for some time now the benefits of switching to water cooling. So far I haven’t found any….
I use the aero7+ with article silver 5. My processor is an AMD Athlon XP 2700+.
Here are my temps –
Not overclocked –
30 – idle
33 – load
Overclocked to 2.35 –
35 - idle
38 – load
This heatsink and fan only cost me $30 with fedex saver from newegg.
The water cooling solutions out there start at $80 and give the same Performance. In fact most that I have seen are worst then my results. Could anyone explain this to me?
PS If you have any suggestions on a water cooling kit that is worth buying it would be helpful. I would want it to be compatible with the sockets, 462, 754, 939, 940, T.
Supporting AMD with your breakable stuff.
I use the aero7+ with article silver 5. My processor is an AMD Athlon XP 2700+.
Here are my temps –
Not overclocked –
30 – idle
33 – load
Overclocked to 2.35 –
35 - idle
38 – load
This heatsink and fan only cost me $30 with fedex saver from newegg.
The water cooling solutions out there start at $80 and give the same Performance. In fact most that I have seen are worst then my results. Could anyone explain this to me?
PS If you have any suggestions on a water cooling kit that is worth buying it would be helpful. I would want it to be compatible with the sockets, 462, 754, 939, 940, T.
Supporting AMD with your breakable stuff.
More about : water air
Well most external watercooling kit do sucks, examples are ones from globalwin, evercool, and thermaltake aquarius 2. If you actually compare to a watercooling kit with high flow pump 1/2" tubing, and high-end DD or Swiftech waterblocks, and 2x120mm radiators, or heatercores. Then they blow air away. The only waterblock i know that's universal is the 1 and only waterblock from Zalman, not sure about model number just go to www.zalmanusa.com and check.
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 509/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 HDD Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 509/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 HDD Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
watercooling is better than aircooling. thats the end of the question.
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
Related ressources
- Custom water -cooling vs . all-in-one vs high end air - Forum
- Water vs Air - Forum
- Water Cooling + Air Cooling? (notice it's a + not a vs ) - Forum
- Water vs air temperature comparisons question. - Forum
- Water vs air : FX-62, crosshair v1, 8800gt SLI - Forum
The biggest benifit of liquid cooling is the stability of temperature. There is very little change between load and idle and OCed and not. I have an external cooling system that I custom rigged, it cost me about $150 to liquid cool my cpu, northbridge, and graphics card. My temps stay at about 20C depending on the time of day (radiator is outside house). No matter how much I OC and no matter how much load I put on it the temps don't change.
I helped a friend put together a liquid cooling system for his computer that is completely internal. He is liquid cooling cpu, northbridge, graphics card, and 2 hard drives. His cpu and everything else max out at 35C and stay there. If he OCs enough it might go to 36 or 37C but I have never seen it go higher.
I'm not forcing liquid cooling on you or anyone but I must say it is worth every penny. I say good riddance to air cooling, the only thing allowed to cool my machine is liquid. If anything there is a certain "cool" factor when having the ability to say, "my computer is liquid cooled".
I helped a friend put together a liquid cooling system for his computer that is completely internal. He is liquid cooling cpu, northbridge, graphics card, and 2 hard drives. His cpu and everything else max out at 35C and stay there. If he OCs enough it might go to 36 or 37C but I have never seen it go higher.
I'm not forcing liquid cooling on you or anyone but I must say it is worth every penny. I say good riddance to air cooling, the only thing allowed to cool my machine is liquid. If anything there is a certain "cool" factor when having the ability to say, "my computer is liquid cooled".
Quote:
watercooling is better than aircooling. thats the end of the question.Water cooling IS air cooling!
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
Water cooling gives you two things, lots of fins and lots of latent heat capacity. You can get the same benefits by making your heatsink huge and heavy. The reason it was originally used in cars for example is packaging, you get to move your radiator to the front of the car. In a computer, you get to move your radiator outside the case. But then again, you could simply put a hole in your case and blow cool air at your heatsink.
If you have the room for a huge heatsink and a practical way to hold all that weight, fine, you'll have fewer parts to break. You can't say water cools better, because water cooling uses a radiator, a heatsink is a radiator, and given the same cool air, airflow, and fin area, both offer the same cooling.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
If you have the room for a huge heatsink and a practical way to hold all that weight, fine, you'll have fewer parts to break. You can't say water cools better, because water cooling uses a radiator, a heatsink is a radiator, and given the same cool air, airflow, and fin area, both offer the same cooling.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
air and convection cooling
@ss
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
@ss
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
LOL, still it shouldn't need to be said that cooling performance is about surface area and fan power, and that water cooling kits are mostly about increasing surface area through use of a larger radiator.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
I would also like to point out that air cooled dirt bikes almost never overheat when idling, but water cooled bikes do. That's because neither use cooling fans, but the open fins of the air cooled bikes flow air due to convection easier than closed fins of the water radiators.
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
<font color=blue>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to a hero as big as Crashman!</font color=blue>
<font color=red>Only a place as big as the internet could be home to an ego as large as Crashman's!</font color=red>
your mother also plays the penis piano when idling
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
true that.. though for showing off / slightly prving my point purposes let me say this: amd athlon 2500 @ ~2.2 Ghz, dnager den maze3, NO FAN, idle 34*C, max 36*C :smile:
thank you and good day
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
thank you and good day
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
The globalwin is worse than the AMD stock cooler lol. for Athlon64 I'd stick with stock, it can handle 1.7Vcore, i've pushed my CPU up to 2400mhz with stock cool. I have the 3200+.
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 509/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 HDD Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
-AMD Athlon64 3200+@2300mhz -3x512 Hynix PC3200 ram@192mhz 2.5-3-3-7 -Albatron 5900PV @ 509/1000 -SB Audigy -Adaptec 1210SA Raid -2x120G Seagate SATA150 7200.7 HDD Raid0 -Enermax 460watt psu
dunno... what was this thread about anyways
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
well, i use motherboard monitor and its pretty exact
the temp shown in the bios will be different from the temp you get when in windows... if you have a temp monitor thats seperate from the pc (like a digi-nurse or something) then the external temp monitor would be the "right" one vs the bios
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
the temp shown in the bios will be different from the temp you get when in windows... if you have a temp monitor thats seperate from the pc (like a digi-nurse or something) then the external temp monitor would be the "right" one vs the bios
<b>and now for something completely different</b>
...<b><A HREF="http://www.bytethiscomputers.sytes.net/site/specs.html" target="_new">system specs</A></b>
Related ressources:
- ForumHow much better is water cooling vs . air cooling?
- ForumAir vs Water Cooling for a new system
- ForumHigh end air cooler vs Low end water cooling kit?
- ForumWater vs air in a high temp environment
- ForumWater Cooled, Vs . Air heat-sinks w/heat-pipe?!
- ForumBest type of cooling? ( Air vs Water )
- ForumWhat cpu cooler? air vs water ?
- ForumWater cooling vs . Air cooling
- ForumAir vs . water cooling
- ForumBest $53 Heatsinks
- More resources
Read discussions in other Overclocking categories
!