I'm gonna break down and get an Intel for media encoding. My damn XP is really slow and I hate starting an encode, going to bed, and waking up at 80% complete!
Every PC I've ever owned has been oc'd-not stopping now. I can't afford new RAM, so PC3200 Corsair Value Select is what I've got to work with. Would I get better results with a 2.4C and a 5:4 or 3:2 divider for overclocking, or give up the HT and get a Prescott 2.4 and OC 1:1 due to the slower stock FSB?
ATM, I'm leaning toward Woody-HT and all would be nice, even w/penalty for OC'ing out of synch.
[Signature Sux now that all my stuff's old-Damn!] Athlon XP 1900 (11x200) 42C (Load w/AX-7 & 8cm Tornado) - MSI K7N2 Delta - 2x256 Corsair Value PC3200 - Gainward GF3 @ 250/550 - 80Gb WD 8Mb Cache -
Every PC I've ever owned has been oc'd-not stopping now. I can't afford new RAM, so PC3200 Corsair Value Select is what I've got to work with. Would I get better results with a 2.4C and a 5:4 or 3:2 divider for overclocking, or give up the HT and get a Prescott 2.4 and OC 1:1 due to the slower stock FSB?
ATM, I'm leaning toward Woody-HT and all would be nice, even w/penalty for OC'ing out of synch.
[Signature Sux now that all my stuff's old-Damn!] Athlon XP 1900 (11x200) 42C (Load w/AX-7 & 8cm Tornado) - MSI K7N2 Delta - 2x256 Corsair Value PC3200 - Gainward GF3 @ 250/550 - 80Gb WD 8Mb Cache -