overclocking laptop gfx cards - bad idea?

Zal

Distinguished
Jun 5, 2004
34
0
18,530
My laptop has a 128mb dedicated ati radeon 9600 mobility, currently set to 351mhz vpu and the ram at 189 mhz. I have installed the newest omega drivers, which incorporate RadLink, similar to overdrive, which lets you overclock the vpu and the vram.

The clock speeds increase in steps. One step above the vram default setitng is 202.5 mhz (increase of 13.5 mhz, or 7%)

does anyone know if trying to overclock laptop gfx adapters is a good idea? or would it be best to leave them at default?
also, if i was to overclock it, how would i go about testing if the new settings are stable?

thanks for your help :)
 

PukePile

Distinguished
Jan 23, 2004
546
0
18,980
I would say dont over clockit becuase the cooling you will ahve in there wont do the job


<A HREF="http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_view.php?run=682299587" target="_new">40k in aquamark 3
</A>
P4b2.4@2.8||1024mb DDR@392mhz||9800pro@420/740||Viewsonic UltraBrite 19"||Panisonic DVD-RW
 

addiarmadar

Distinguished
May 26, 2003
2,558
0
20,780
Yes very bad idea. They have very limited cooling solutions and limited voltage.

Mobile Barton 2500+ @ 2420mhz 11x220 1.7v
Asus A7N8X Dlx 440 FSB
1gb Geil GD pc3500 Dual Channel (2-3-3-6)
Segata 80gb SATA 8.5ms seek
ATI Radeon 9800 Pro to XT(463/795)